IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlaop/v2012y2012i1id359p69-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Classical and Bayesian Probability and Statitics (1)
[Srovnání klasické a Bayesovské pravděpodobnosti a statistiky (1.)]

Author

Listed:
  • Petr Hebák

Abstract

Statistics has been developing for almost 250 years - since the publication of an essay which included one theorem called Bayes' after the author. This whole period (since 1763 to this day) has been accompanied by a duel between the supporters of a subjective concept of probability and those who refuse everything but a purely objective concept of probability as well as statistics. While the 18th and 19th centuries accepted the importance of the subjective (let us say Bayesian) way of thinking for the development of probability and statistics without a problem, in the 20th century the classic (frequentist) way took over and has been dominant in teaching and textbooks to this day. Only in the second half of the 20th century did the situation begin to change slowly. Reasons for that are partly described in the present article, but arguments and simple examples supporting the Bayesian way in comparison with the classic one are clear and generally respected worldwide. Unsuspected new computing possibilities have caused an explosive development of Bayesian statistics, which has infiltrated almost all the areas of statistics and a number of other scientific fields. It is not possible to expect a retreat of the different philosophical or pedagogical positions of the fighting schools of thought (even though it is really needed), but the use of advantages of both the approaches is methodologically not only possible, but even expected. Part of the teaching of statistics must be prepared for these changes, but it has not been the case in the Czech Republic at all so far.

Suggested Citation

  • Petr Hebák, 2012. "A Comparison of Classical and Bayesian Probability and Statitics (1) [Srovnání klasické a Bayesovské pravděpodobnosti a statistiky (1.)]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(1), pages 69-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaop:v:2012:y:2012:i:1:id:359:p:69-87
    DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://aop.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.aop.359.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://aop.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.aop.359.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.aop.359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramsey, Frank P., 1926. "Truth and Probability," Histoy of Economic Thought Chapters, in: Braithwaite, R. B. (ed.),The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, chapter 7, pages 156-198, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2019. "What are axiomatizations good for?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 339-359, May.
    2. Chateauneuf, Alain & Eichberger, Jurgen & Grant, Simon, 2007. "Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 538-567, November.
    3. Jean Baccelli & Philippe Mongin, 2016. "Choice-based cardinal utility: a tribute to Patrick Suppes," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 268-288, July.
    4. Panagiotidis, Theodore & Printzis, Panagiotis, 2020. "What is the investment loss due to uncertainty?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    5. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2015. "In Praise of Frank Ramsey's Contribution to the Theory of Taxation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(583), pages 235-268, March.
    6. Marcello Basili, 2006. "A Rational Decision Rule with Extreme Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1721-1728, December.
    7. Oleg Yu Vorobyev, 2018. "The logic of uncertainty as a logic of experience and chance and the co~event-based Bayes' theorem," Papers 1810.01310, arXiv.org.
    8. Adrian C. Darnell, 1994. "A Dictionary Of Econometrics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 118.
    9. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri & Rasocha, Vlastimil, 2021. "Experimental methods: Eliciting beliefs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 234-256.
    10. Cristina Lidia MANEA, 2016. "Financial products as alternatives to traditional deposits," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(137), pages 526-526, April.
    11. Victor Aguirregabiria, 2021. "Identification of firms’ beliefs in structural models of market competition," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 5-33, February.
    12. Pope, Robin & Selten, Reinhard, 2009. "Risk in a Simple Temporal Framework for Expected Utility Theory and for SKAT, the Stages of Knowledge Ahead Theory," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 27/2009, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    13. Feduzi, Alberto & Runde, Jochen, 2014. "Uncovering unknown unknowns: Towards a Baconian approach to management decision-making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 268-283.
    14. Richard Bradley, 2003. "Axiomatic Bayesian Utilitarianism," Working Papers hal-00242956, HAL.
    15. Gabriel Frahm, 2015. "A theoretical foundation of portfolio resampling," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 107-132, July.
    16. Knowles, Glenn J., 1980. "Estimating Utility Functions," Risk Analysis in Agriculture: Research and Educational Developments, January 16-18, 1980, Tucson, Arizona 271570, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    17. Berrada, Tony & Detemple, Jérôme & Rindisbacher, Marcel, 2018. "Asset pricing with beliefs-dependent risk aversion and learning," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 504-534.
    18. Bethany J. Weber & Wah Pheow Tan, 2012. "Ambiguity aversion in a delay analogue of the Ellsberg Paradox," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(4), pages 383-389, July.
    19. Antonio Cabrales & José-Ramón Uriarte, 2013. "Doubts and equilibria," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 783-810, September.
    20. Ralph L. Keeney, 2013. "Foundations for Group Decision Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 103-120, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    subjective probability; frequentist statistics; classical and Bayesian approach and thinking; Bayes' theorem; point estimation; prior and posterior distribution; Bayesian Credible interval; hypothesis testing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C82 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data; Data Access
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaop:v:2012:y:2012:i:1:id:359:p:69-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.