IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0233772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on parking sharing strategies considering user overtime parking

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Huang
  • Xueqin Long
  • Jianjun Wang
  • Lan He

Abstract

A parking sharing strategy is proposed to solve the problems of parking difficulty caused by the imbalance between parking spaces and parking demand. The vacant parking spaces of residential area can be efficiently utilized to meet the parking demands of those who are working at nearby or come for other activities based on the parking sharing strategy. The paper analyzes the distribution of vehicle arrival numbers and parking durations, then establishes a shared parking allocation model aiming to maximize the parking benefit considering the overtime-parking behavior of the parking users. Simulation methods are used to the analyze the relationship among the parking benefit, proportion of reserved parking, numbers of parking demand, acceptance rate of parking demand and utilization of shared parking spaces. Then, based on the principle of maximum parking benefit, we can determine the optimal proportion of reserved parking, number of shared parking spaces that should be purchased from the residents. Taking the utilization of shared parking spaces as an indicator, the validity of the static allocation principle is proved to be effective. Some allocation rules for parking demand are proposed to guarantees the maximum parking revenue and minimum impact on residents simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Huang & Xueqin Long & Jianjun Wang & Lan He, 2020. "Research on parking sharing strategies considering user overtime parking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233772
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233772
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233772&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0233772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Bo & Kafle, Nabin & Wolfson, Ouri & Lin, Jie (Jane), 2015. "A mechanism design based approach to solving parking slot assignment in the information era," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 631-653.
    2. Mei, Zhenyu & Feng, Chi & Ding, Wenchao & Zhang, Lihui & Wang, Dianhai, 2019. "Better lucky than rich? Comparative analysis of parking reservation and parking charge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 47-56.
    3. Yang, Hai & Liu, Wei & Wang, Xiaolei & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2013. "On the morning commute problem with bottleneck congestion and parking space constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 106-118.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yangbeibei Ji & Xueqing Lu & Hanwan Jiang & Xinyang Zhu & Jiao Wang, 2022. "Layout Optimization for Shared Parking Spaces Considering Shared Parking Walking Time and Parking Fee," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Junxiao Ren & Xin Chang & Ying Hou & Bo Cao, 2023. "Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Decision-Theoretic Rough Set Model and Its Application in Supervision of Shared Parking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Lukáš Dvořáček & Martin Horák & Michaela Valentová & Jaroslav Knápek, 2020. "Optimization of Electric Vehicle Charging Points Based on Efficient Use of Chargers and Providing Private Charging Spaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Pengfei & Guan, Hongzhi & Liu, Peng, 2020. "Modeling and solving the optimal allocation-pricing of public parking resources problem in urban-scale network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 74-98.
    2. Lu, Xiao-Shan & Guo, Ren-Yong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Xu, Xiaoming & Chen, Jiajia, 2021. "Equilibrium analysis of parking for integrated daily commuting," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Lu, Xiao-Shan & Huang, Hai-Jun & Guo, Ren-Yong & Xiong, Fen, 2021. "Linear location-dependent parking fees and integrated daily commuting patterns with late arrival and early departure in a linear city," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 293-322.
    4. Zipeng Zhang & Ning Zhang, 2021. "Early Bird Scheme for Parking Management: How Does Parking Play a Role in the Morning Commute Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Jiang, Bowen & Fan, Zhi-Ping, 2020. "Optimal allocation of shared parking slots considering parking unpunctuality under a platform-based management approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Zhang, Fangni & Lindsey, Robin & Yang, Hai & Shao, Chaoyi & Liu, Wei, 2022. "Two-sided pricing strategies for a parking sharing platform: Reselling or commissioning?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 40-63.
    7. Shao, Saijun & Xu, Su Xiu & Yang, Hai & Huang, George Q., 2020. "Parking reservation disturbances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 83-97.
    8. Ling-Ling Xiao & Tian-Liang Liu & Hai-Jun Huang, 2021. "Tradable permit schemes for managing morning commute with carpool under parking space constraint," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1563-1586, August.
    9. Wang, Tao & Liao, Peng & Tang, Tie-Qiao & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2022. "Deterministic capacity drop and morning commute in traffic corridor with tandem bottlenecks: A new manifestation of capacity expansion paradox," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Han, Linghui & Zhu, Chengjuan & Wang, David Z.W. & Sun, Huijun & Tan, Zhijia & Meng, Meng, 2019. "Discrete-time dynamic road congestion pricing under stochastic user optimal principle," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 24-36.
    11. Qian, Zhen (Sean) & Rajagopal, Ram, 2014. "Optimal occupancy-driven parking pricing under demand uncertainties and traveler heterogeneity: A stochastic control approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 144-165.
    12. Yi Liu & Mark Hansen, 2016. "Incorporating Predictability Into Cost Optimization for Ground Delay Programs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 132-149, February.
    13. Premaratne Samaranayake & Upul Gunawardana & Michael Stokoe, 2023. "Kerbside Parking Assessment Using a Simulation Modelling Approach for Infrastructure Planning—A Metropolitan City Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Igor Lazov, 2019. "A Methodology for Revenue Analysis of Parking Lots," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 177-198, March.
    15. Knockaert, Jasper & Verhoef, Erik T. & Rouwendal, Jan, 2016. "Bottleneck congestion: Differentiating the coarse charge," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 59-73.
    16. Zhenyu Mei & Chi Feng & Liang Kong & Lihui Zhang & Jun Chen, 2020. "Assessment of Different Parking Pricing Strategies: A Simulation-based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Jie Yang & Fang He & Xi Lin & Max Zuo‐Jun Shen, 2021. "Mechanism Design for Stochastic Dynamic Parking Resource Allocation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3615-3634, October.
    18. Sun, Yanshuo & Gong, Hengye & Guo, Qianwen & Schonfeld, Paul & Li, Zhongfei, 2020. "Regulating a public transit monopoly under asymmetric cost information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 496-522.
    19. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Gandomi, Amir & Roorda, Matthew J., 2020. "Illegal parking and optimal enforcement policies with search friction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang & Bai, Yun, 2020. "Mechanism design for on-demand first-mile ridesharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 77-117.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.