IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a population wide cost estimating framework and methods for technological intervention enabling ageing in place: An Australian case

Author

Listed:
  • Azad Rahman
  • Delwar Akbar
  • John Rolfe
  • Julie Nguyen

Abstract

Purpose: Ageing in place is one of the greatest desires of elderly people. Assistive digital technologies could potentially delay the institutionalization of the elderly people and allow them ageing in place. This study develops a population-wide cost estimating framework for adopting digital technologies that can improve the quality of life of elderly people through examining an Australian region. Methods: We developed a five-stage cost estimation framework, which involved progressive forecasting of elderly population and direct cost estimation methods. The forecasting and cost estimation models have been set for a 10-year period because the prediction accuracy from cross-sectional data is better in the short to medium term compared to the long-term. For cost estimation, we categorised the ageing population on the basis of the number of chronic diseases that they have contracted. Costs of assistive technologies were collected from open sources. The model has been tested in the Fitzroy and Central West, a regional area of Queensland in Australia. A stakeholder panel discussion in a workshop format was used to validate the appropriateness of the proposed framework and the study findings. Results: This study identified eight common chronic diseases with different comorbidity patterns in Australia. We also identified the required assistive technologies to assist patients with chronic diseases. This study estimated that annual per capita cost for technological intervention could range from AUD 4,169 to AUD 7,551 on the basis of different price margins of the technologies. Conclusion: The approach of categorising the aged cohorts on the basis of the number of chronic diseases helps estimate population-wide costs compared to using single technology intervention costs for a particular chronic disease cohort. The cost estimation framework and the method developed in this study can assist the government to estimate costs for ageing-in-place programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Azad Rahman & Delwar Akbar & John Rolfe & Julie Nguyen, 2019. "Developing a population wide cost estimating framework and methods for technological intervention enabling ageing in place: An Australian case," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218448
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218448
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218448&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucy Kok & Caroline Berden & Klarita Sadiraj, 2015. "Costs and benefits of home care for the elderly versus residential care: a comparison using propensity scores," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(2), pages 119-131, March.
    2. Lehoux, P. & Grimard, D., 2018. "When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 330-337.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakx, Pieter & Wouterse, Bram & van Doorslaer, Eddy & Wong, Albert, 2020. "Better off at home? Effects of nursing home eligibility on costs, hospitalizations and survival," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Maaike Diepstraten & Rudy Douven & Bram Wouterse, 2019. "Can your house keep you out of a nursing home?," CPB Discussion Paper 397, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Maaike Diepstraten & Rudy Douven & Bram Wouterse, 2019. "Can your house keep you out of a nursing home?," CPB Discussion Paper 397.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Boada, Júlia Pareto & Maestre, Begoña Román & Genís, Carme Torras, 2021. "The ethical issues of social assistive robotics: A critical literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Judith Bom & Pieter Bakx & Sara Rellstab, 2022. "Well‐being right before and after a permanent nursing home admission," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(12), pages 2558-2574, December.
    6. de Aguiar, Ana Raquel Pena & Ramos, Tânia Rodrigues Pereira & Gomes, Maria Isabel, 2023. "Home care routing and scheduling problem with teams’ synchronization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Elena Gentili & Giuliano Masiero & Fabrizio Mazzonna, 2016. "The Role of Culture in Long-term Care," IdEP Economic Papers 1605, USI Università della Svizzera italiana.
    8. Martin Mende, 2019. "The innovation imperative in healthcare: an interview and commentary," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 121-131, June.
    9. Krabbe-Alkemade, Yvonne & Makai, Peter & Shestalova, Victoria & Voesenek, Tessa, 2020. "Containing or shifting? Health expenditure decomposition for the aging Dutch population after a major reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 268-274.
    10. Na, Eunkyung & Jung, Yoonhyuk & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "How do care service managers and workers perceive care robot adoption in elderly care facilities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Leporatti Lucia & Montefiori Marcello, 2020. "The Challenge of Organizing Elderly Care Programmes: Optimal Policy Design under Complete and Asymmetric Information," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Helen Weatherly & Rita Faria & Bernard Van den Berg & Mark Sculpher & Peter O’Neill & Kay Nolan & Julie Glanville & Jaana Isojarvi & Erin Baragula & Mary Edwards, 2017. "Scoping review on social care economic evaluation methods," Working Papers 150cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    13. Nguyen Tan Loi & Nguyen Tien Dung & Ho Nhut Quang, 2021. "The cost effectiveness of aging in place: A literature review," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 11(1), pages 40-54.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.