IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0155738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remote Monitoring of Chronic Diseases: A Landscape Assessment of Policies in Four European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Rojahn
  • Suzanne Laplante
  • James Sloand
  • Claire Main
  • Aftab Ibrahim
  • Janet Wild
  • Nicky Sturt
  • Thelga Areteou
  • K Ian Johnson

Abstract

Background: Remote monitoring (RM) is defined as the surveillance of device-transmitted outpatient data. RM is expected to enable better management of chronic diseases. The objective of this research was to identify public policies concerning RM in four European countries. Methods: Searches of the medical literature, the Internet, and Ministry of Health websites for the United Kingdom (UK), Germany, Italy, and Spain were performed in order to identify RM policies for chronic diseases, including end stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD), diabetes, heart failure, and hypertension. Searches were first performed in Q1 2014 and updated in Q4 2015. In addition, in depth interviews were conducted with payers/policymakers in each country. Information was obtained on existing policies, disease areas and RM services covered and level of reimbursement, other incentives such as quality indicators, past/current assessments of RM technologies, diseases perceived to benefit most from RM, and concerns about RM. Results: Policies on RM and/or telemedicine were identified in all four countries. Pilot projects (mostly in diabetes, COPD, and/or heart failure) existed or were planned in most countries. Perceived value of RM was moderate to high, with the highest rating given for heart failure. Interviewees expressed concerns about sharing of medical information, and the need for capital investment. Patients recently discharged from hospital, and patients living remotely, or with serious and/or complicated diseases, were believed to be the most likely to benefit from RM. Formal reimbursement is scarce, but more commonly available for patients with heart failure. Conclusions: In the four European countries surveyed, RM has attracted considerable interest for its potential to increase the efficiency of healthcare for chronic diseases. Although rare at this moment, incentives to use RM technology are likely to increase in the near future as the body of evidence of clinical and/or economic benefit grows.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Rojahn & Suzanne Laplante & James Sloand & Claire Main & Aftab Ibrahim & Janet Wild & Nicky Sturt & Thelga Areteou & K Ian Johnson, 2016. "Remote Monitoring of Chronic Diseases: A Landscape Assessment of Policies in Four European Countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0155738
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155738
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155738&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0155738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Office of Health Economics, 2007. "The Economics of Health Care," For School 001490, Office of Health Economics.
    2. Guy Paré & Placide Poba-Nzaou & Claude Sicotte, 2013. "Home telemonitoring for chronic disease management: an economic assessment," Post-Print hal-01517028, HAL.
    3. Giuseppe Pontoriero & Pietro Pozzoni & Lucia Vecchio & Francesco Locatelli, 2007. "International Study of Health Care Organization and Financing for renal replacement therapy in Italy: an evolving reality," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 201-215, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Gabriella Melchiorre & Giovanni Lamura & Francesco Barbabella & on behalf of ICARE4EU Consortium, 2018. "eHealth for people with multimorbidity: Results from the ICARE4EU project and insights from the “10 e’s” by Gunther Eysenbach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avi Dor & Mark V. Pauly & Margaret A. Eichleay & Philip J. Held, 2007. "End-stage Renal Disease and Economic Incentives: The International Study of Health Care Organization and Financing," NBER Working Papers 13125, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Anne-Line Couillerot-Peyrondet & Cléa Sambuc & Yoël Sainsaulieu & Cécile Couchoud & Isabelle Bongiovanni-Delarozière, 2017. "A comprehensive approach to assess the costs of renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease in France: the importance of age, diabetes status, and clinical events," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(4), pages 459-469, May.
    3. Wim Biesen & Norbert Lameire & Patrick Peeters & Raymond Vanholder, 2007. "Belgium’s mixed private/public health care system and its impact on the cost of end-stage renal disease," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 133-148, September.
    4. Björn Wikström & Michael Fored & Margaret Eichleay & Stefan Jacobson, 2007. "The financing and organization of medical care for patients with end-stage renal disease in Sweden," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 269-281, December.
    5. Avi Dor & Mark Pauly & Margaret Eichleay & Philip Held, 2007. "End-stage renal disease and economic incentives: the International Study of Health Care Organization and Financing (ISHCOF)," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 73-111, September.
    6. José Luño, 2007. "The organization and financing of end-stage renal disease in Spain," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 253-267, December.
    7. Isabelle Durand-Zaleski & Christian Combe & Philippe Lang, 2007. "International Study of Health Care Organization and Financing for end-stage renal disease in France," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 171-183, September.
    8. Werner Kleophas & Helmut Reichel, 2007. "International study of health care organization and financing: development of renal replacement therapy in Germany," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 185-200, September.
    9. Christian Lorenz, 2012. "Triangulating health expenditure estimates from different data sources in developing countries," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    10. James F. Burgess & Matthew L. Maciejewski & Chris L. Bryson & Michael Chapko & John C. Fortney & Mark Perkins & Nancy D. Sharp & Chuan‐Fen Liu, 2011. "Importance of health system context for evaluating utilization patterns across systems," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(2), pages 239-251, February.
    11. McDonald, Rebecca & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2018. "The Shadow Prices of Voluntary Caregiving: Using Panel Data of Well-Being to Estimate the Cost of Informal Care," IZA Discussion Papers 11545, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Verónica Amarante & Marco Manacorda & Edward Miguel & Andrea Vigorito, 2016. "Do Cash Transfers Improve Birth Outcomes? Evidence from Matched Vital Statistics, Program, and Social Security Data," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-43, May.
    13. Hope Corman & Dhaval Dave & Nancy E. Reichman, 2018. "Evolution of the Infant Health Production Function," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(1), pages 6-47, July.
    14. Trottmann, Maria & Zweifel, Peter & Beck, Konstantin, 2012. "Supply-side and demand-side cost sharing in deregulated social health insurance: Which is more effective?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 231-242.
    15. Michael Geruso & Timothy J. Layton & Jacob Wallace, 2023. "What Difference Does a Health Plan Make? Evidence from Random Plan Assignment in Medicaid," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 341-379, July.
    16. Cinzia Di Novi & Rowena Jacobs & Matteo Migheli, 2013. "The quality of life of female informal caregivers: from Scandinavia to the Mediterranean Sea," Working Papers 084cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    17. Colombier, Carsten & Weber, Werner, 2009. "Projecting health-care expenditure for Switzerland: further evidence against the 'red-herring' hypothesis," MPRA Paper 26747, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2009.
    18. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    19. Marianne P. Bitler & Madeline Zavodny, 2014. "Medicaid: A Review of the Literature," NBER Working Papers 20169, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Seungchul Lee & Robert Rosenman, 2013. "Reimbursement and Investment: Prospective Payment and For-Profit Hospitals’ Market Share," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 503-518, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0155738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.