IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0056478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between NADPH Oxidase p22phox C242T Polymorphism and Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bing-Hu Li
  • Li-Li Zhang
  • Bei-Bei Zhang
  • Yan-Wei Yin
  • Li-Meng Dai
  • Yan Pi
  • Lu Guo
  • Chang-Yue Gao
  • Chuan-Qin Fang
  • Jing-Zhou Wang
  • Jing-Cheng Li

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase p22phox C242T polymorphism and risk of ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD), but the results remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis was therefore designed to clarify these controversies. Methodology/Principal Findings: Systematic searches of electronic databases Embase, PubMed and Web of Science, as well as hand searching of the references of identified articles and the meeting abstracts were performed. Statistical analyses were performed using software Review Manager (Version 5.1.7) and Stata (Version 11.0). The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were performed. Fixed or random effects model was separately used depending on the heterogeneity between studies. Publication bias was tested by Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test. A total of 6 studies including 1,948 cases and 2,357 controls were combined showing no statistical evidence of association between NADPH oxidase p22phox C242T polymorphism and overall ICVD (allelic model: OR = 1.08, 95%CI = 0.93–1.26; additive model: OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 0.81–2.17; dominant model: OR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.86–1.15; recessive model: OR = 1.06, 95%CI = 0.77–1.45). Significant association was found in large-artery atherosclerotic stroke subgroup (allelic model: OR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.88–1.41; additive model: OR = 1.36, 95%CI = 0.60–3.09; dominant model: OR = 1.25, 95%CI = 0.74–2.11; recessive model: OR = 2.17, 95%CI = 1.11–4.23). No statistical evidence of significant association was observed for small-vessel occlusive stroke, as well as Asian subgroup and Caucasian subgroup. Statistical powers on the combined sample size (total and subgroup) were all lower than 80%. Conclusions/Significance: This meta-analysis indicates that NADPH oxidase p22phox C242T polymorphism is more associated with large-artery atherosclerotic stroke than small-vessel occlusive stroke. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. Larger sample-size studies with homogeneous ICVD patients and well-matched controls are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing-Hu Li & Li-Li Zhang & Bei-Bei Zhang & Yan-Wei Yin & Li-Meng Dai & Yan Pi & Lu Guo & Chang-Yue Gao & Chuan-Qin Fang & Jing-Zhou Wang & Jing-Cheng Li, 2013. "Association between NADPH Oxidase p22phox C242T Polymorphism and Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-8, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0056478
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0056478
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0056478&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0056478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yong-qiang Wang & Xiao-wei Qi & Fan Wang & Jun Jiang & Qiao-nan Guo, 2012. "Association between TGFBR1 Polymorphisms and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 35 Case-Control Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Mingliang Gu & Xiaoqun Dong & Xuezhi Zhang & Xumin Wang & Yue Qi & Jun Yu & Wenquan Niu, 2012. "Strong Association between Two Polymorphisms on 15q25.1 and Lung Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Ting Wang & Yang Liu & Li Sima & Liang Shi & Zhaoming Wang & Chunhui Ni & Zhengdong Zhang & Meilin Wang, 2012. "Association between MLH1 -93G>A Polymorphism and Risk of Colorectal Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    4. Mei-Ling Zhu & Mengyun Wang & Zhi-Gang Cao & Jing He & Ting-Yan Shi & Kai-Qin Xia & Li-Xin Qiu & Qing-Yi Wei, 2012. "Association between the ERCC5 Asp1104His Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.
    5. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    6. Ting-Yan Shi & Jing He & Li-Xin Qiu & Mei-Ling Zhu & Meng-Yun Wang & Xiao-Yan Zhou & Jiali Han & Hongpin Yu & Rong-Yu Zang & Qingyi Wei, 2012. "Association between XPF Polymorphisms and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Antje Fischer-Rosinsky & Eva Fisher & Peter Kovacs & Matthias Blüher & Matthias Möhlig & Andreas F H Pfeiffer & Heiner Boeing & Joachim Spranger, 2008. "Lack of Association between the Tagging SNP A+930→G of SOCS3 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-Analysis of Four Independent Study Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(12), pages 1-4, December.
    8. Donald Edmondson & Safiya Richardson & Louise Falzon & Karina W Davidson & Mary Alice Mills & Yuval Neria, 2012. "Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Prevalence and Risk of Recurrence in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Meta-analytic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-10, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bei-Bei Zhang & Xing-Zhen Liu & Jin Sun & Yan-Wei Yin & Qian-Qian Sun, 2013. "Association between TNF α Gene Polymorphisms and the Risk of Duodenal Ulcer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Qi Wang & Juntao Ke & Qibin Song & Weiguo Hu & Xuzai Lu & Zhenling Wang & Hongyun Gong & Tangpeng Xu & Xueqin Chen & Bin Xu & Cheng Liu & Yun Sun & Yajie Gong & Yang Yang & Ying Zhu, 2015. "The SNP rs931794 in 15q25.1 Is Associated with Lung Cancer Risk: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Haina Du & Nannan Guo & Bin Shi & Qian Zhang & Zhipeng Chen & Kai Lu & Yongqian Shu & Tao Chen & Lingjun Zhu, 2014. "The Effect of XPD Polymorphisms on Digestive Tract Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    4. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    5. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    6. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    9. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    10. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.
    12. Xue-Ying Xu & Hong Kong & Rui-Xiang Song & Yu-Han Zhai & Xiao-Fei Wu & Wen-Si Ai & Hong-Bo Liu, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Biomarkers to Predict Hepatitis B-Related Significant Fibrosis and Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Vicente Miñana-Signes & Manuel Monfort-Pañego & Javier Valiente, 2021. "Teaching Back Health in the School Setting: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Obsa Urgessa Ayana & Jima Degaga, 2022. "Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: a meta-regression analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 209-261, June.
    16. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. García-Poole, Chloe & Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José, 2019. "How do communities intervene with adolescents at psychosocial risk? A systematic review of positive development programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 194-209.
    18. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Qing Ye & Bao-Xin Qian & Wei-Li Yin & Feng-Mei Wang & Tao Han, 2016. "Association between the HFE C282Y, H63D Polymorphisms and the Risks of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis o," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Bishal Mohindru & David Turner & Tracey Sach & Diana Bilton & Siobhan Carr & Olga Archangelidi & Arjun Bhadhuri & Jennifer A. Whitty, 2020. "Health State Utility Data in Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 13-25, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0056478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.