IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1009591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural network features distinguish chemosensory stimuli in Caenorhabditis elegans

Author

Listed:
  • Javier J How
  • Saket Navlakha
  • Sreekanth H Chalasani

Abstract

Nervous systems extract and process information from the environment to alter animal behavior and physiology. Despite progress in understanding how different stimuli are represented by changes in neuronal activity, less is known about how they affect broader neural network properties. We developed a framework for using graph-theoretic features of neural network activity to predict ecologically relevant stimulus properties, in particular stimulus identity. We used the transparent nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, with its small nervous system to define neural network features associated with various chemosensory stimuli. We first immobilized animals using a microfluidic device and exposed their noses to chemical stimuli while monitoring changes in neural activity of more than 50 neurons in the head region. We found that graph-theoretic features, which capture patterns of interactions between neurons, are modulated by stimulus identity. Further, we show that a simple machine learning classifier trained using graph-theoretic features alone, or in combination with neural activity features, can accurately predict salt stimulus. Moreover, by focusing on putative causal interactions between neurons, the graph-theoretic features were almost twice as predictive as the neural activity features. These results reveal that stimulus identity modulates the broad, network-level organization of the nervous system, and that graph theory can be used to characterize these changes.Author summary: Animals use their nervous systems to detect and respond to changes in their external environment. A central challenge in computational neuroscience is to determine how specific properties of these stimuli affect interactions between neurons. While most studies have focused on the neurons in the sensory periphery, recent advances allow us to probe how the rest of the nervous system responds to sensory stimulation. We recorded activity of neurons within the C. elegans head region while the animal was exposed to various chemosensory stimuli. We then used computational methods to identify various stimuli by analyzing neural activity. Specifically, we used a combination of population-level activity statistics (e.g., average, standard deviation, frequency-based measures) and graph-theoretic features of functional network structure (e.g., transitivity, which is the existence of strongly connected triplets of neurons) to accurately predict salt stimulus. Our method is general and can be used across species, particularly in instances where the identities of individual neurons are unknown. These results also suggest that neural activity downstream of the sensory periphery contains a signature of changes in the environment.​

Suggested Citation

  • Javier J How & Saket Navlakha & Sreekanth H Chalasani, 2021. "Neural network features distinguish chemosensory stimuli in Caenorhabditis elegans," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-38, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009591
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009591
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009591&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:cbooks:9780511771576 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hiroshi Suzuki & Tod R. Thiele & Serge Faumont & Marina Ezcurra & Shawn R. Lockery & William R. Schafer, 2008. "Functional asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans taste neurons and its computational role in chemotaxis," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7200), pages 114-117, July.
    3. Sreekanth H. Chalasani & Nikos Chronis & Makoto Tsunozaki & Jesse M. Gray & Daniel Ramot & Miriam B. Goodman & Cornelia I. Bargmann, 2007. "Dissecting a circuit for olfactory behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7166), pages 63-70, November.
    4. Minrong Ai & Soohong Min & Yael Grosjean & Charlotte Leblanc & Rati Bell & Richard Benton & Greg S. B. Suh, 2010. "Acid sensing by the Drosophila olfactory system," Nature, Nature, vol. 468(7324), pages 691-695, December.
    5. Amina Kurtovic & Alexandre Widmer & Barry J. Dickson, 2007. "A single class of olfactory neurons mediates behavioural responses to a Drosophila sex pheromone," Nature, Nature, vol. 446(7135), pages 542-546, March.
    6. Easley,David & Kleinberg,Jon, 2010. "Networks, Crowds, and Markets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521195331.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Clark & Vera Hapiak & Mitchell Oakes & Holly Mills & Richard Komuniecki, 2018. "Monoamines differentially modulate neuropeptide release from distinct sites within a single neuron pair," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Thomas A. Verschut & Renny Ng & Nicolas P. Doubovetzky & Guillaume Calvez & Jan L. Sneep & Adriaan J. Minnaard & Chih-Ying Su & Mikael A. Carlsson & Bregje Wertheim & Jean-Christophe Billeter, 2023. "Aggregation pheromones have a non-linear effect on oviposition behavior in Drosophila melanogaster," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Blazquez-Soriano, Amparo & Ramos-Sandoval, Rosmery, 2022. "Information transfer as a tool to improve the resilience of farmers against the effects of climate change: The case of the Peruvian National Agrarian Innovation System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Martin L. Weitzman, 2015. "A Voting Architecture for the Governance of Free-Driver Externalities, with Application to Geoengineering," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 117(4), pages 1049-1068, October.
    5. Wei Zhong, 2017. "Simulating influenza pandemic dynamics with public risk communication and individual responsive behavior," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 475-495, December.
    6. Guo Weilong & Minca Andreea & Wang Li, 2016. "The topology of overlapping portfolio networks," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 33(3-4), pages 139-155, December.
    7. Thomas J. Sargent & John Stachurski, 2022. "Economic Networks: Theory and Computation," Papers 2203.11972, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    8. Bernd (B.) Heidergott & Jia-Ping Huang & Ines (I.) Lindner, 2018. "Naive Learning in Social Networks with Random Communication," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-018/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    9. Johannes M. Bauer & Michael Latzer, 2016. "The economics of the Internet: an overview," Chapters, in: Johannes M. Bauer & Michael Latzer (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, chapter 1, pages 3-20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Kobayashi, Teruyoshi & Takaguchi, Taro, 2018. "Identifying relationship lending in the interbank market: A network approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 20-36.
    11. Konstantinos Antoniadis & Kostas Zafiropoulos & Vasiliki Vrana, 2016. "A Method for Assessing the Performance of e-Government Twitter Accounts," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Maness, Michael & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2016. "An indirect latent informational conformity social influence choice model: Formulation and case study," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 75-101.
    13. Bauer, Johannes M., 2014. "Platforms, systems competition, and innovation: Reassessing the foundations of communications policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 662-673.
    14. Julia Neidhardt & Nataliia Rümmele & Hannes Werthner, 0. "Predicting happiness: user interactions and sentiment analysis in an online travel forum," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    15. OKUBO Toshihiro & ONO Yukako & SAITO Yukiko, 2014. "Roles of Wholesalers in Transaction Networks," Discussion papers 14059, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    16. Glover, Dominic & Kim, Sung Kyu & Stone, Glenn Davis, 2020. "Golden Rice and technology adoption theory: A study of seed choice dynamics among rice growers in the Philippines," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    17. Daron Acemoglu & Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Werning & Michael D. Whinston, 2021. "Optimal Targeted Lockdowns in a Multigroup SIR Model," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 487-502, December.
    18. Mark Braverman & Jing Chen & Sampath Kannan, 2016. "Optimal Provision-After-Wait in Healthcare," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 352-376, February.
    19. Lomi, Alessandro & Fonti, Fabio, 2012. "Networks in markets and the propensity of companies to collaborate: An empirical test of three mechanisms," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 216-220.
    20. Zhang, Xuxi & Liu, Xianping & Lewis, Frank L. & Wang, Xia, 2020. "Bipartite tracking consensus of nonlinear multi-agent systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.