IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ieroec/v13y2022i2p335-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The position of China in trade in services within the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Adam A. Ambroziak

    (SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland)

  • Joanna Stefaniak

    (University of Gdañsk, Poland)

Abstract

Research background: In recent decades, services in international trade have been growing steadily in importance, and there has been strong growth in China’s trade in services as a result of the ‘opening up’ policy. China has become the European Union’s second biggest trading partner in services with the European Union (EU), being China’s largest trading partner. The EU is one of the addressees of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative, which creates opportunities and threads to the European Internal Market in services. Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to contribute to the literature and fulfil the research gap on the position of China in intra-EU trade in services. Methods: We identified the most important types of services offered by China to purchasers from the EU countries. By using the Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA) and trade balance (LFI) indices, we classified the Chinese exports to the EU Internal Market by types of services and by their trade position. Findings & value added: We found out that China might be perceived as a strong competitor for intra-EU trade in selected services, especially those concerning low-end service tasks, that use relatively low-skilled labour and are less knowledge- and capital-intensive. However, China’s attitude is changing towards more sophisticated services for example R&D. It creates a need for a new approach to the EU economic policies (in terms of both protectionism and interventionism) in trade relations in services with China.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam A. Ambroziak & Joanna Stefaniak, 2022. "The position of China in trade in services within the European Union," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 335-354, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:335-354
    DOI: 10.24136/oc.2022.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/oc.2022.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Stefaniak-Kopoboru & Joanna Kuczewska, 2016. "Export Specialization In Services Of The Visegrad Countries," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(2), pages 265-284, June.
    2. Kyoung-Suk Choi, 2021. "The Current Status and Challenges of China Railway Express (CRE) as a Key Sustainability Policy Component of the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Nicholas Bloom & Mirko Draca & John Van Reenen, 2016. "Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(1), pages 87-117.
    4. Liu, Qing & Yang, Yang & Ke, Luqi & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Structures of port connectivity, competition, and shipping networks in Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Xiaolan Fu & Pervez Ghauri, 2021. "Trade in intangibles and the global trade imbalance," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1448-1469, May.
    6. Paola Caselli & Andrea Zaghini, 2005. "International specialization models in Latin America: the case of Argentina," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 558, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Mei-Jan Kung & Ying-Zhen Li & Wan-Ping Tai, 2016. "The Political Economy Analysis of China–ASEAN in Service Industrial Cooperation and Open Policy," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 414-428, November.
    8. Tri WIDODO, 2009. "Comparative Advantage: Theory, Empirical Measures And Case Studies," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 4, pages 57-82, November.
    9. Keld Laursen, 2015. "Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(1), pages 99-115, June.
    10. Kaveri Deb & Bodhisattva Sengupta, 2017. "On Empirical Distribution of RCA Indices," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 6(1), pages 23-41, January.
    11. Du, Yiying & Zhou, Wenyuan & Lian, Feng, 2022. "A scheme for passenger service-like backhaul for China railway express trains," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 56-68.
    12. Duan, Hongbo & Bao, Qin & Tian, Kailan & Wang, Shouyang & Yang, Cuihong & Cai, Zongwu, 2021. "The hit of the novel coronavirus outbreak to China's economy," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Yuan Li & Hans-Jörg Schmerer, 2017. "Trade and the New Silk Road: opportunities, challenges, and solutions," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 205-213, July.
    14. Langhammer, Rolf J., 2004. "Revealed comparative advantages in the services trade of the United States, the European Union and Japan: what do they tell us?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3429, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Platania, Marco & Rapisarda, P. & Rizzo, M., 2015. "Italian Trade Specialization: Persistence and Change in Regional Agri-Food Production," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(4), pages 1-9, December.
    16. Bent Dalum & Keld Laursen & Gert Villumsen, 1998. "Structural Change in OECD Export Specialisation Patterns: de-specialisation and 'stickiness'," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 423-443.
    17. Duncan Freeman, 2017. "Redistributing the EU-China economic relationship: the role of domestic change in China," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 187-198, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naoki Sekiguchi, 2017. "Trade specialisation patterns in major steelmaking economies: the role of advanced economies and the implications for rapid growth in emerging market and developing economies in the global steel marke," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 30(3), pages 207-227, October.
    2. Dominika Choros-Mrozowska, 2020. "Changes and Comparisons in Pattern of Polish Chinese Trade within the “16+1” Format," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 327-342.
    3. Cimpoies, Liliana & Sarbu, Olga, 2020. "The competitiveness of Moldova’s agri-food trade with E.U. after DCFTA implementation," MPRA Paper 106297, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Lubos SMUTKA & Mansoor MAITAH & Miroslav SVATOS, 2018. "Changes in the Czech agrarian foreign trade competitiveness - different groups of partners' specifics," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(9), pages 399-411.
    5. Binoy Goswami & Hiranya K. Nath, 2021. "India'S Revealed Comparative Advantages In Merchandise Trade With Country Groups At Different Levels Of Development," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 377-397, April.
    6. Ishchukova, N. & Smutka, L., 2013. "Comparative Advantage: Products Mapping of the Russian Agricultural Exports," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Junshi Li & Yao Pan, 2023. "EU and China’s comparative advantage, trade complementarity and trade specialization dynamics in agricultural products," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 351-379, September.
    8. Esquivias, M.A., 2017. "The Change of Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Activities in East Java Within the Context of Asean Economic Integration," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(1), March.
    9. Ronen, Eyal & Benizri, Yohan, 2018. "Export Competitiveness and Trade Agreements: Analysis and Insights from Israel’s Experience," MPRA Paper 84945, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Iglesias, Matias Nehuen, 2021. "Measuring size distortions of location quotients," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 189-205.
    11. Satyendra Nath Chakrabartty, 2023. "Constructing Aggregated Revealed Comparative Advantage Index of a Country," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 5(1), pages 64-77, April.
    12. Ning Li, 2017. "Evolutionary patterns of national disciplinary profiles in research: 1996–2015," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 493-520, April.
    13. Souguir, Afef, 2019. "Evolution of the specialization of the Tunisian international trade on the European market," MPRA Paper 92500, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Rinaldo Evangelista & Valentina Meliciani & Antonio Vezzani, 2019. "Fast Growing and Key Enabling Technologies and their impact on regional growth inEurope," Working Papers 42, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2021.
    15. Judit Nagy & Zsófia Jámbor, 2019. "Competitiveness in Dairy Trade – the Case of EU and the Visegrad Group Countries," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 11(4), December.
    16. Oliveiraa, Ma de Fátima Lorena de & Cepeda, Mariano Suárez de & Bernabéu, Rodolfo, 2017. "Competitiveness analysis of the Portuguese processed tomato sector and development strategies," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 1), January.
    17. Nestor Gandelman & Osiris J. Parcero & Matilde Pereira & Flavia Roldán, 2021. "Ventajas comparativas reveladas en disciplinas científicas y tecnológicas en Uruguay," Documentos de Investigación 125, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    18. Jenny P. Danna-Buitrago & Rémi Stellian, 2022. "A New Class of Revealed Comparative Advantage Indexes," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 477-503, July.
    19. Viet V. Hoang, 2019. "Investigating the evolution of agricultural trade specialization in transition economies: A case study from Vietnam," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 361-378, July.
    20. Pawlak, Karolina & Poczta, Walenty, 2020. "Competitiveness of Polish Agriculture in The Context of Globalization and Economic Integration – Competitive Potential and Position," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311270, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trade in services; China; European Union; comparative advantage; trade position;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • L80 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - General
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:335-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.