IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5017-d546402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Current Status and Challenges of China Railway Express (CRE) as a Key Sustainability Policy Component of the Belt and Road Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Kyoung-Suk Choi

    (Department of International Trade, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea)

Abstract

Under the auspices of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China has been expanding the operation of its CRE (China Railway Express) system that links China and Europe. The CRE is today regarded as an important measure of progress by which BRI-related goals are achieved, and it has the potential to become the most sustainable mode of long-range transport. The system has been growing rapidly thanks to the active support of the Chinese government. As the Eurasian trade and logistics environment changes, CRE will become increasingly important as a third option that complements air and sea transport, with the demand continuing to accelerate among shippers for CRE service. Despite the expanding role and potential importance of the CRE system, few academic studies have been undertaken on the relevant CRE policies and status, especially in international academic journals. Thus, this study comprehensively reviewed the specific operation status of CRE system by route and region, and identified specific challenges that need to be addressed in order to continue its sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyoung-Suk Choi, 2021. "The Current Status and Challenges of China Railway Express (CRE) as a Key Sustainability Policy Component of the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5017-:d:546402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5017/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    2. Shiqi Li & Maoxiang Lang & Xueqiao Yu & Mingyue Zhang & Minghe Jiang & Sangbing Tsai & Cheng-Kuang Wang & Fang Bian, 2019. "A Sustainable Transport Competitiveness Analysis of the China Railway Express in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-30, May.
    3. Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Zhi-Hua Hu & Sang-Jeong Lee & Kyoung-Suk Choi & Sung-Ho Shin, 2018. "Research trends and agenda on the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative with a focus on maritime transport," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 282-300, April.
    4. Wang, Chao & Lim, Ming K. & Zhang, Xinyi & Zhao, Longfeng & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2020. "Railway and road infrastructure in the Belt and Road Initiative countries: Estimating the impact of transport infrastructure on economic growth," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 288-307.
    5. Lei Xing & Hong Yan & Yandong Yin & Qi Xu, 2021. "Research on the Optimization of Empty Container Repositioning of China Railway Express in Cooperation with International Liner Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Yang, Zhongzhen & Sun, Yu & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2020. "Impact of the development of the China-Europe Railway Express – A case on the Chongqing international logistics center," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 244-261.
    7. Zhao, Laijun & Zhao, Yue & Hu, Qingmi & Li, Huiyong & Stoeter, Johan, 2018. "Evaluation of consolidation center cargo capacity and loctions for China railway express," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 58-81.
    8. Huang, Yiping, 2016. "Understanding China's Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 314-321.
    9. Jiang, Yonglei & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Peng, Zixuan & Yu, Bin, 2018. "Hinterland patterns of China Railway (CR) express in China under the Belt and Road Initiative: A preliminary analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 189-201.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ling-Yun He & Sha Liu, 2023. "Impact of China Railway Express on Regional Resource Mismatch—Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Adam A. Ambroziak & Joanna Stefaniak, 2022. "The position of China in trade in services within the European Union," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 335-354, June.
    3. Xiao Wang & Jiaojiao Li & Jingming Shi & Jia Li & Jianxu Liu & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2023. "Does China–Europe Railway Express Improve Green Total Factor Productivity in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Yaoming & Kundu, Tanmoy & Goh, Mark & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2021. "Multimodal transportation network centrality analysis for Belt and Road Initiative," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Wei, Hairui & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2021. "Designing a coordinated horizontal alliance system for China’s inland ports with China railway express platforms along the Silk Road Economic Belt," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Fenling Feng & Tianzuo Zhang & Chengguang Liu & Lifeng Fan, 2020. "China Railway Express Subsidy Model Based on Game Theory under “the Belt and Road” Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Jingjing Cao & Tianyi Guo & Yan Chen, 2023. "Modeling Government Subsidy Strategies for Railway Carriers: Environmental Impacts and Industry Competition," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Gong, Xu & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2022. "Determination of subsidy and emission control coverage under competition and cooperation of China-Europe Railway Express and liner shipping," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 323-335.
    6. Zhang, Yilin & Zhang, Anming & Wang, Kun & Zheng, Shiyuan & Yang, Hangjun & Hong, Junjie, 2023. "Impact of CR Express and intermodal freight transport competition on China-Europe Route: Emission and welfare implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Qi, Yingxiu & Harrod, Steven & Psaraftis, Harilaos N. & Lang, Maoxiang, 2022. "Transport service selection and routing with carbon emissions and inventory costs consideration in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Yang, Zhongzhen & Sun, Yu & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2020. "Impact of the development of the China-Europe Railway Express – A case on the Chongqing international logistics center," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 244-261.
    9. Ali, Usman & Li, Yanxi & Wang, Jian-Jun & Yue, Xiaohang & Chang, Ai-Chih (Jasmine), 2021. "Dynamics of outward FDI and productivity spillovers in logistics services industry: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Wen, Xin & Ma, Hoi-Lam & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative on the China-Europe trading route selections," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 581-604.
    11. Li, Qinglin & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lori & Wiegmans, Bart & Guo, Jingwei & Tang, Yinying & Peng, Qiyuan, 2020. "Customers’ preferences for freight service attributes of China Railway Express," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 225-236.
    12. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Analyzing the effect of government subsidy on shippers’ mode switching behavior in the Belt and Road strategic context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 175-202.
    13. Shujuan Guo & Cuijie Diao & Gang Li & Katsuhiko Takahashi, 2021. "The Two-Echelon Dual-Channel Models for the Intermodal Container Terminals of the China Railway Express Considering Container Accumulation Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Yanfeng Liu & Xue Li & Xiaonan Zhu & Min-Kyu Lee & Po-Lin Lai, 2023. "The theoretical systems of OFDI location determinants in global north and global south economies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Jonathan Doh & Pawan Budhwar & Geoffrey Wood, 2021. "Long-term energy transitions and international business: Concepts, theory, methods, and a research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 951-970, July.
    16. Li, Chunying & Zhang, Jinning & Lyu, Yanwei, 2022. "Does the opening of China railway express promote urban total factor productivity? New evidence based on SDID and SDDD model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    18. Li, Xinyan & Xie, Chi & Bao, Zhaoyao, 2022. "A multimodal multicommodity network equilibrium model with service capacity and bottleneck congestion for China-Europe containerized freight flows," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    19. Naima Saeed & Kevin Cullinane & Victor Gekara & Prem Chhetri, 2021. "Reconfiguring maritime networks due to the Belt and Road Initiative: impact on bilateral trade flows," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 381-400, September.
    20. Shiqi Li & Maoxiang Lang & Xueqiao Yu & Mingyue Zhang & Minghe Jiang & Sangbing Tsai & Cheng-Kuang Wang & Fang Bian, 2019. "A Sustainable Transport Competitiveness Analysis of the China Railway Express in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-30, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5017-:d:546402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.