IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v9y2022i1d10.1057_s41599-022-01212-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Co-construction” in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate

Author

Listed:
  • Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet

    (Ecole des Ponts ParisTech
    Centre International de Recherche Sur l’environnement et le Développement (CIRED))

  • Bénédicte Apouey

    (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    Paris School of Economics)

  • Hazem Arab

    (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

  • Simon Baeckelandt

    (Université de Lille
    Centre d’études et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales (CERAPS))

  • Philippe Bégout

    (GIS Démocratie et Participation)

  • Nicolas Berghmans

    (Sciences Po
    Institut Pour le Développement Durable et Les Relations Internationales (IDDRI))

  • Nathalie Blanc

    (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    Laboratoire Dynamiques Sociales et Recomposition des Espaces (LADYSS))

  • Jean-Yves Boulin

    (Université Paris-Dauphine
    Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences Sociales (IRISSO))

  • Eric Buge

    (Université Panthéon-Assas Paris II
    Institut Michel Villey)

  • Dimitri Courant

    (Université de Lausanne, Institut d’Études Politiques
    Université Paris 8, Centre de Recherches Sociologiques et Politiques de Paris (CRESPPA)
    Harvard University, Ash Center)

  • Amy Dahan

    (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    Centre Alexandre Koyré)

  • Adrien Fabre

    (ETH Zürich)

  • Jean-Michel Fourniau

    (GIS Démocratie et Participation
    Université Gustave Eiffel)

  • Maxime Gaborit

    (Sciences Po
    Centre d’études Européennes et de Politique Comparée (CEE))

  • Laurence Granchamp

    (Université de Strasbourg
    Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire en études Culturelles (LinCS))

  • Hélène Guillemot

    (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    Centre Alexandre Koyré)

  • Laurent Jeanpierre

    (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
    Centre Européen de Sociologie et de Science Politique (CESSP))

  • Hélène Landemore

    (Yale University)

  • Jean-François Laslier

    (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    Paris School of Economics)

  • Antonin Macé

    (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    Paris School of Economics)

  • Claire Mellier

    (Cardiff University
    Centre for Climate Change and Social Transformation (CAST))

  • Sylvain Mounier

    (GIS Démocratie et Participation)

  • Théophile Pénigaud

    (Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon
    Triangle. Action, Discours, Pensée Politique et économique)

  • Ana Póvoas

    (Rhizome Chôros
    Université Libre de Bruxelles
    Laboratoire Sasha)

  • Christiane Rafidinarivo

    (Université de la Réunion
    Laboratoire de Recherche sur les Espaces Créoles et Francophones (LCF)
    Centre de Recherches Politiques de Sciences Po (CEVIPOF))

  • Bernard Reber

    (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    Centre de Recherches Politiques de Sciences Po (CEVIPOF))

  • Romane Rozencwajg

    (Université Paris 8, Centre de Recherches Sociologiques et Politiques de Paris (CRESPPA))

  • Philippe Stamenkovic

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
    Jacques Loeb Center for the History and Philosophy of Science)

  • Selma Tilikete

    (Université Paris 8, Centre de Recherches Sociologiques et Politiques de Paris (CRESPPA)
    Centre Alexandre Koyré
    Ecole des Hautes études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS))

  • Solène Tournus

    (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    GIS Démocratie et Participation)

Abstract

Launched in 2019, the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate (CCC) tasked 150 randomly chosen citizens with proposing fair and effective measures to fight climate change. This was to be fulfilled through an “innovative co-construction procedure”, involving some unspecified external input alongside that from the citizens. Did inputs from the steering bodies undermine the citizens’ accountability for the output? Did co-construction help the output resonate with the general public, as is expected from a citizens’ assembly? To answer these questions, we build on our unique experience in observing the CCC proceedings and documenting them with qualitative and quantitative data. We find that the steering bodies’ input, albeit significant, did not impair the citizens’ agency, creativity, and freedom of choice. While succeeding in creating consensus among the citizens who were involved, this co-constructive approach, however, failed to generate significant support among the broader public. These results call for a strengthening of the commitment structure that determines how follow-up on the proposals from a citizens’ assembly should be conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet & Bénédicte Apouey & Hazem Arab & Simon Baeckelandt & Philippe Bégout & Nicolas Berghmans & Nathalie Blanc & Jean-Yves Boulin & Eric Buge & Dimitri Courant & Amy Dahan & Adrien F, 2022. "“Co-construction” in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01212-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01212-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-022-01212-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-022-01212-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolyn M. Hendriks, 2006. "When the Forum Meets Interest Politics: Strategic Uses of Public Deliberation," Politics & Society, , vol. 34(4), pages 571-602, December.
    2. Dryzek, John S. & Stevenson, Hayley, 2011. "Global democracy and earth system governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1865-1874, September.
    3. Adrien Fabre & Bénédicte Apouey & Thomas Douenne & Jean-Michel Fourniau & Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet & Jean-François Laslier & Solène Tournus, 2021. "Who Are the Citizens of the French Convention for Climate?," CIRED Working Papers halshs-03265053, HAL.
    4. Yves Vaillancourt, 2009. "Social Economy In The Co‐Construction Of Public Policy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 275-313, June.
    5. Neblo, Michael A. & Esterling, Kevin M. & Kennedy, Ryan P. & Lazer, David M.J. & Sokhey, Anand E., 2010. "Who Wants To Deliberate—And Why?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 104(3), pages 566-583, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Strzelecka, Marianna & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Akhshik, Arash & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2021. "Environmental justice in Natura 2000 conservation conflicts: The case for resident empowerment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Christoph Niessen, 2019. "When citizen deliberation enters real politics: how politicians and stakeholders envision the place of a deliberative mini-public in political decision-making," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 481-503, September.
    3. Liz Barry, 2022. "Community science and the design of climate governance," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Crystal Legacy & Ryan van den Nouwelant, 2015. "Negotiating Strategic Planning's Transitional Spaces: The Case of ‘Guerrilla Governance’ in Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(1), pages 209-226, January.
    5. Nasiritousi, Naghmeh & Hjerpe, Mattias & Buhr, Katarina, 2014. "Pluralising climate change solutions? Views held and voiced by participants at the international climate change negotiations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 177-184.
    6. Schouten, Greetje & Leroy, Pieter & Glasbergen, Pieter, 2012. "On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The Roundtables on Responsible Soy and Sustainable Palm Oil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 42-50.
    7. Hoti, Ferdiana & Perko, Tanja & Thijssen, Peter & Renn, Ortwin, 2021. "Who is willing to participate? Examining public participation intention concerning decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Anderson, Blake & M'Gonigle, Michael, 2012. "Does ecological economics have a future?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 37-48.
    9. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Greetje Schouten, 2018. "Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 333-356, June.
    10. John M. Gowdy, 2013. "Valuing nature for climate change policy: from discounting the future to truly social deliberation," Chapters, in: Roger Fouquet (ed.), Handbook on Energy and Climate Change, chapter 25, pages 547-560, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Shukui Tan & Haipeng Song & Ghulam Akhmat & Javeed Hussain, 2014. "Governing Harmonious Human Engagement with the Spatial Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Lederer, Markus, 2011. "From CDM to REDD+ -- What do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1900-1907, September.
    13. Michelle Scobie, 2020. "International aid, trade and investment and access and allocation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-254, June.
    14. Ash Seth & Meaghan Edwards & Katrina Milaney & Jennifer Zwicker, 2022. "How Governments Could Best Engage Community Organizations to Co-Design COVID-19 Pandemic Policies for Persons with Disabilities," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 15(8), February.
    15. Biermann, Frank & Gupta, Aarti, 2011. "Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1856-1864, September.
    16. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Elena SERFILIPPI & Gayatri RAMNATH, 2018. "Resilience Measurement And Conceptual Frameworks: A Review Of The Literature," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(4), pages 645-664, December.
    18. Mitchell, Ronald B., 2011. "Transparency for governance: The mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1882-1890, September.
    19. Farrell, Katharine N., 2014. "Intellectual mercantilism and franchise equity: A critical study of the ecological political economy of international payments for ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 137-146.
    20. Mullon, C. & Steinmetz, F. & Merino, G. & Fernandes, J.A. & Cheung, W.W.L. & Butenschön, M. & Barange, M., 2016. "Quantitative pathways for Northeast Atlantic fisheries based on climate, ecological–economic and governance modelling scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 273-291.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01212-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.