IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/resear/v15y2022i8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Governments Could Best Engage Community Organizations to Co-Design COVID-19 Pandemic Policies for Persons with Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Ash Seth

    (University of Calgary)

  • Meaghan Edwards

    (University of Calgary)

  • Katrina Milaney

    (University of Calgary)

  • Jennifer Zwicker

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and the policy measures adopted in response have disproportionately impacted persons with disabilities. Given the increased risk of COVID-19 and the resulting health impact for this vulnerable population, governments must engage stakeholders such as community organizations to co-design pandemic response plans. Collaboration with key stakeholders could assist in transforming services in crucial areas, such as health, where emergency policies are organized around the needs of persons with disabilities. Unfortunately, there is inadequate data collection and insufficient emergency preparedness planning and responses for persons with disabilities. This knowledge gap means consideration of health and social policy implications specific to the needs and experiences of persons with disabilities is lacking. This research study aimed to evaluate strategies through which decision-makers could engage stakeholders, such as community organizations, to co-design disability-inclusive policy responses during the COVID-19 outbreak in Alberta. Through interviews, the study focused on understanding the level of engagement, barriers to community organizations’ engagement and participatory policy aspects best suited for co-design. Key findings from the research highlighted the participants’ viewpoints on barriers, facilitators, preferences and other critical approaches through which decision-makers engage with community organizations. Results highlighted that top-down and tokenistic consultation approaches limit community organizations’ engagement in designing pandemic planning and response. Inaccessible ways of consultation and navigation barriers exacerbate obstacles to stakeholder engagement. Stakeholder engagement in data surveillance efforts was unclear, and the impact assessment process needs strengthening. The study results also showed that having COVID-19 disability advisory groups at the federal and provincial levels are a robust mechanism to connect communities with the government. However, the process of influencing government decision-making and policy actions needs to be openly communicated to civil society. Solutions are achievable. Political commitment, long-term investments and an accessible engagement environment would significantly improve stakeholder engagement. Governments must transition from traditional consultative methods to sustainable engagement practices while sharing how public policies reflect communities’ input. Financial investments must create an accessible consultation environment for designing participatory pandemic policies that reflect the priorities of persons with disabilities. Some key recommendations emerging from our analysis include: • Invest financially to create an accessible consultation environment for codesigning policies. • Consult stakeholders to develop new regulations or adjust existing ones to create inclusive pandemic response plans. • Inform how pandemic response plans include and address community inputs and concerns in a transparent manner. • Professionally contract stakeholders to co-design and communicate pandemic information. • Engage with multiple stakeholders to evaluate the impact of pandemic response plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Ash Seth & Meaghan Edwards & Katrina Milaney & Jennifer Zwicker, 2022. "How Governments Could Best Engage Community Organizations to Co-Design COVID-19 Pandemic Policies for Persons with Disabilities," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 15(8), February.
    • Handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:15:y:2022:i:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/HSP91_Disabilities_Seth-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie Dunn & Jennifer D. Zwicker, 2018. "Policy Brief – Why is Uptake of the Disability Tax Credit Low in Canada? Exploring Possible Barriers to Access," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 11(2), January.
    2. Campbell, V.A. & Gilyard, J.A. & Sinclair, L. & Sternberg, T. & Kailes, J.I., 2009. "Preparing for and responding to pandemic influenza: Implications for people with disabilities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(S2), pages 294-300.
    3. Carolyn Dudley & Jennifer Zwicker, 2016. "Mind the Gap: Transportation Challenges for Individuals Living with Austism Spectrum Disorder," SPP Communique, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 8(2), January.
    4. Yves Vaillancourt, 2009. "Social Economy In The Co‐Construction Of Public Policy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 275-313, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brielle Lillywhite & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Emergency and Disaster Management, Preparedness, and Planning (EDMPP) and the ‘Social’: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-50, October.
    2. Brielle Lillywhite & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Risk Narrative of Emergency and Disaster Management, Preparedness, and Planning (EDMPP): The Importance of the ‘Social’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-36, December.
    3. Jean-Christophe Boucher & Jack Edwards & Jenny Kim & Abbas Badami & Henry Smith, 2022. "Disinformation and Russia-Ukrainian War on Canadian Social Media," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 15(16), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hugo Consciência Silvestre, 2017. "Themed Issue: Cash Transfers and Microfinance," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(5), pages 703-720, September.
    2. Leonardo Becchetti & Fabio Pisani & Luca Raffaele, 2023. "Co-planning and co-design as progress in the implementation of welfare services," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 70(3), pages 301-322, September.
    3. McMullin, Caitlin, 2018. "Co-production and the third sector: A comparative study of England and France," Thesis Commons 578d3, Center for Open Science.
    4. Ho, Jae-Yun & Yoon, Semee, 2022. "Ambiguous roles of intermediaries in social entrepreneurship: The case of social innovation system in South Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING (ed.), 2022. "New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods," CIRIEC Studies Series, CIRIEC - Université de Liège, volume 3, number css3.
    6. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING, 2022. "Conclusions and Directions for further Research," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 0, pages 259-274, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    7. Gillian Petit & Craig Scott & Blake Gallacher & Jennifer Zwicker & Lindsay Tedds, 2020. "Less Income for More Hours of Work: Barriers to Work for Social Assistance Recipients in B.C," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 13(16), July.
    8. Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet & Bénédicte Apouey & Hazem Arab & Simon Baeckelandt & Philippe Bégout & Nicolas Berghmans & Nathalie Blanc & Jean-Yves Boulin & Eric Buge & Dimitri Courant & Amy Dahan & Adrien F, 2022. "“Co-construction” in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Jillian Roberts & Bianca Humbert & Robyn MacMillan & Celeste Duff, 2022. "The Resilience and Mental Health Experiences of Emerging Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Creating Safeguards for the Future," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    10. Julie L. MacArthur, 2017. "Trade, Tarsands and Treaties: The Political Economy Context of Community Energy in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Adyya Gupta & Anne Kavanagh & George Disney, 2021. "The Impact of and Government Planning and Responses to Pandemics for People with Disability: A Rapid Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-9, June.
    12. Janice Chan & Somayyeh Mohammadi & Elham Esfandiari & Julia Schmidt & W. Ben Mortenson & William C. Miller, 2023. "Living through the Pandemic with a Disability: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-12, June.
    13. Petit, Gillian & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2020. "Interactions between income and social support programs in B.C," MPRA Paper 105927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Elena SERFILIPPI & Gayatri RAMNATH, 2018. "Resilience Measurement And Conceptual Frameworks: A Review Of The Literature," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(4), pages 645-664, December.
    15. Alexandrine LAPOUTTE & Georges ALAKPA, 2022. "The resilience of public–social economy partnerships for food justice: a case study," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 3, pages 59-80, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    16. Bismark Adu-Gyamfi & Rajib Shaw, 2021. "Utilizing Population Distribution Patterns for Disaster Vulnerability Assessment: Case of Foreign Residents in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area of Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Xiaojun Zhang & Fanfan Wang & Changwen Zhu & Zhiqiang Wang, 2019. "Willingness to Self-Isolate When Facing a Pandemic Risk: Model, Empirical Test, and Policy Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Izakian, Hesam & Russell, Matthew Joseph & Zwicker, Jennifer & Cui, Xinjie & Tough, Suzanne, 2019. "Trajectory of service use among Albertan youth with complex service need," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 229-238.
    19. Craig W. M. Scott & Patrick Berrigan & Ronald D. Kneebone & Jennifer D. Zwicker, 2022. "Disability Considerations for Measuring Poverty in Canada Using the Market Basket Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 389-407, August.
    20. Inmaculada Buendía-Martínez & Agustín Álvarez-Herranz & Mercedes Moreira Menéndez, 2020. "Business Cycle, SSE Policy, and Cooperatives: The Case of Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:15:y:2022:i:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.