IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-01511-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deviance as an historical artefact: a scoping review of psychological studies of body modification

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Owens

    (University of Sunderland)

  • Steven J. Filoromo

    (Temple University
    University of Alabama)

  • Lauren A. Landgraf

    (University of Alabama)

  • Christopher D. Lynn

    (University of Alabama)

  • Michael R. A. Smetana

    (University of Alabama)

Abstract

Body modification is a blanket term for tattooing, piercing, scarring, cutting, and other forms of bodily alteration generally associated with fashion, identity, or cultural markings. Body modifications like tattooing and piercing have become so common in industrialised regions of the world that what were once viewed as marks of abnormality are now considered normal. However, the psychological motivations for body modification practices are still being investigated regarding deviance or risky behaviours, contributing to a sense in the academic literature that body modifications are both normal and deviant. We explored this inconsistency by conducting a scoping review of the psychological literature on body modifications under the assumption that the psychological and psychiatric disciplines set the standard for related research. We searched for articles in available online databases and retained those published in psychology journals or interdisciplinary journals where at least one author is affiliated with a Psychology or Psychiatry programme (N = 94). We coded and tabulated the articles thematically, identifying five categories and ten subcategories. The most common category frames body modifications in general terms of risk, but other categories include health, identity, credibility/employability, and fashion/attractiveness. Trends in psychology studies seem to follow the shifting emphasis in the discipline from a clinical orientation regarding normality and abnormality to more complex social psychological approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Owens & Steven J. Filoromo & Lauren A. Landgraf & Christopher D. Lynn & Michael R. A. Smetana, 2023. "Deviance as an historical artefact: a scoping review of psychological studies of body modification," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01511-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01511-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-01511-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-01511-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bogusław Antoszewski & Aneta Sitek & Marta Fijałkowska & Anna Kasielska & Julia Kruk-Jeromin, 2010. "Tattooing and Body Piercing - What Motivates You To Do It?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(5), pages 471-479, September.
    2. Ruffle, Bradley J. & Wilson, Anne E., 2019. "Tat will tell: Tattoos and time preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 566-585.
    3. Jessa Lingel & danah boyd, 2013. "“Keep it secret, keep it safe”: Information poverty, information norms, and stigma," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(5), pages 981-991, May.
    4. Jessa Lingel & danah boyd, 2013. "“Keep it secret, keep it safe”: Information poverty, information norms, and stigma," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(5), pages 981-991, May.
    5. Rik Dillingh & Peter Kooreman & Jan Potters, 2020. "Tattoos, Lifestyle, and the Labor Market," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 34(2), pages 191-214, June.
    6. Jennings, Wesley G. & Fox, Bryanna Hahn & Farrington, David P., 2014. "Inked into Crime? An Examination of the Causal Relationship between Tattoos and Life-Course Offending among Males from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 77-84.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanessa L. Kitzie & Travis L. Wagner & Valerie Lookingbill & Nicolas Vera, 2022. "Advancing information practices theoretical discourses centered on marginality, community, and embodiment: Learning from the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and as," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 494-510, April.
    2. Jannica Heinström & Eero Sormunen & Reijo Savolainen & Stefan Ek, 2020. "Developing an empirical measure of everyday information mastering," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(7), pages 729-741, July.
    3. Bryce Clayton Newell, 2023. "Surveillance as information practice," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(4), pages 444-460, April.
    4. Ruffle, Bradley J. & Wilson, Anne E., 2019. "Tat will tell: Tattoos and time preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 566-585.
    5. Daviti Jibuti, 2018. "Discrimination against Workers with Visible Tattoos: Experimental Evidence from Germany," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp628, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    6. Rik Dillingh & Peter Kooreman & Jan Potters, 2020. "Tattoos, Lifestyle, and the Labor Market," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 34(2), pages 191-214, June.
    7. Jennings, Wesley G. & Richards, Tara N. & Dwayne Smith, M. & Bjerregaard, Beth & Fogel, Sondra J., 2014. "A Critical Examination of the “White Victim Effect” and Death Penalty Decision-Making from a Propensity Score Matching Approach: The North Carolina Experience," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 384-398.
    8. Ruffle, Bradley J. & Wilson, Anne E., 2018. "The truth about tattoos," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 143-147.
    9. Chan, Ho Fai & Ulrich, Fabian & Altman, Hannah & Schmidt, Sascha L. & Schreyer, Dominik & Torgler, Benno, 2022. "Beyond performance? The importance of subjective and objective physical appearance in award nominations and receptions in football," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 271-289.
    10. Jennings, Wesley G. & Piquero, Alex R. & Rocque, Michael & Farrington, David P., 2015. "The effects of binge and problem drinking on problem behavior and adjustment over the life course: Findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 453-463.
    11. Sierra, Jeremy J. & Jillapalli, Ravi K. & Badrinarayanan, Vishag A., 2013. "Determinants of a lasting purchase: The case of the tattoo patron," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 389-399.
    12. Joanna Witkoś & Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka, 2020. "Gender Differences in Subjective Pain Perception during and after Tattooing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Kincaid, Paula A. & Short, Jeremy C. & Wolfe, Marcus T., 2022. "Got ink, get paid? Exploring the impact of tattoo visibility on crowdfunding performance," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    14. Jennings, Wesley G. & Maldonado-Molina, Mildred & Fenimore, Danielle M. & Piquero, Alex R. & Bird, Hector & Canino, Glorisa, 2019. "The linkage between mental health, delinquency, and trajectories of delinquency: Results from the Boricua Youth Study," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 66-73.
    15. Andrew R. Timming & David Ian Perrett, 2017. "An experimental study of the effects of tattoo genre on perceived trustworthiness: Not all tattoos are created equal," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 115-128, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01511-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.