IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v74y2023i4p444-460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surveillance as information practice

Author

Listed:
  • Bryce Clayton Newell

Abstract

Surveillance, as a concept and social practice, is inextricably linked to information. It is, at its core, about information extraction and analysis conducted for some regulatory purpose. Yet, information science research only sporadically leverages surveillance studies scholarship, and we see a lack of sustained and focused attention to surveillance as an object of research within the domains of information behavior and social informatics. Surveillance, as a range of contextual and culturally based social practices defined by their connections to information seeking and use, should be framed as information practice—as that term is used within information behavior scholarship. Similarly, manifestations of surveillance in society are frequently perfect examples of information and communications technologies situated within everyday social and organizational structures—the very focus of social informatics research. The technological infrastructures and material artifacts of surveillance practice—surveillance technologies—can also be viewed as information tools. Framing surveillance as information practice and conceptualizing surveillance technologies as socially and contextually situated information tools can provide space for new avenues of research within the information sciences, especially within information disciplines that focus their attention on the social aspects of information and information technologies in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryce Clayton Newell, 2023. "Surveillance as information practice," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(4), pages 444-460, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:4:p:444-460
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Borko, 1968. "Information science: What is it?," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 3-5, January.
    2. Jessa Lingel & danah boyd, 2013. "“Keep it secret, keep it safe”: Information poverty, information norms, and stigma," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(5), pages 981-991, May.
    3. Lindsay K. Brown & Tiffany C. Veinot, 2021. "Information behavior and social control: Toward an understanding of conflictual information behavior in families managing chronic illness," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(1), pages 66-82, January.
    4. Katie Shilton, 2012. "Participatory personal data: An emerging research challenge for the information sciences," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 1905-1915, October.
    5. Grace Fox & Lisa van der Werff & Pierangelo Rosati & Patricia Takako Endo & Theo Lynn, 2022. "Examining the determinants of acceptance and use of mobile contact tracing applications in Brazil: An extended privacy calculus perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 944-967, July.
    6. Devendra Potnis & Macy Halladay, 2022. "Information practices of administrators for controlling information in an online community of new mothers in rural America," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1621-1640, November.
    7. Karen Yeung, 2018. "Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 505-523, December.
    8. Katie Shilton, 2012. "Participatory personal data: An emerging research challenge for the information sciences," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 1905-1915, October.
    9. Nik Thompson & Tanya McGill & Anna Bunn & Rukshan Alexander, 2020. "Cultural factors and the role of privacy concerns in acceptance of government surveillance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 1129-1142, September.
    10. Monique Mann & Peta Mitchell & Marcus Foth & Irina Anastasiu, 2020. "#BlockSidewalk to Barcelona: Technological sovereignty and the social license to operate smart cities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 1103-1115, September.
    11. Diana Floegel & Kaitlin L. Costello, 2022. "Methods for a feminist technoscience of information practice: Design justice and speculative futurities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 625-634, April.
    12. Ping Zhang & Robert I. Benjamin, 2007. "Understanding information related fields: A conceptual framework," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 1934-1947, November.
    13. Daniel Carter & Amelia Acker & Dan Sholler, 2021. "Investigative approaches to researching information technology companies," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 655-666, June.
    14. Young, Meg & Katell, Michael & Krafft, P. M., 2019. "Municipal Surveillance Regulation and Algorithmic Accountability," SocArXiv zx2sw, Center for Open Science.
    15. Luke Stark & Amanda Stanhaus & Denise L. Anthony, 2020. "“I Don't Want Someone to Watch Me While I'm Working”: Gendered Views of Facial Recognition Technology in Workplace Surveillance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 1074-1088, September.
    16. Michael Buckland, 1991. "Rejoinder to “Information as thing”," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(10), pages 758-758, December.
    17. Kyle M. L. Jones & Alan Rubel & Ellen LeClere, 2020. "A matter of trust: Higher education institutions as information fiduciaries in an age of educational data mining and learning analytics," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(10), pages 1227-1241, October.
    18. Kay Mathiesen, 2015. "Human rights as a topic and guide for LIS research and practice," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(7), pages 1305-1322, July.
    19. Michael K. Buckland, 1991. "Information as thing," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(5), pages 351-360, June.
    20. Irina Shklovski & Emily Troshynski & Paul Dourish, 2015. "Mobile technologies and the spatiotemporal configurations of institutional practice," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(10), pages 2098-2115, October.
    21. Zuo, Zhiya & Zhao, Kang & Ni, Chaoqun, 2019. "Standing on the shoulders of giants?—Faculty hiring in information schools," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 341-353.
    22. Sara Vannini & Ricardo Gomez & Bryce Clayton Newell, 2020. "“Mind the five”: Guidelines for data privacy and security in humanitarian work with undocumented migrants and other vulnerable populations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(8), pages 927-938, August.
    23. Black, Julia, 2002. "Critical reflections on regulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35985, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    24. Anabel Quan‐Haase & Dennis Ho, 2020. "Online privacy concerns and privacy protection strategies among older adults in East York, Canada," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 1089-1102, September.
    25. Lena Ulbricht & Karen Yeung, 2022. "Algorithmic regulation: A maturing concept for investigating regulation of and through algorithms," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 3-22, January.
    26. Yubing Tian & Ricardo Gomez & Marika Cifor & James Wilson & Henry Morgan, 2021. "The information practices of law enforcement: Passive and active collaboration and its implication for sanctuary laws in Washington state," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(11), pages 1354-1366, November.
    27. Lisa P. Nathan, 2012. "Sustainable information practice: An ethnographic investigation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2254-2268, November.
    28. Lisa P. Nathan, 2012. "Sustainable information practice: An ethnographic investigation," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2254-2268, November.
    29. Marcia J. Bates, 1999. "The invisible substrate of information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(12), pages 1043-1050.
    30. Britt Paris & Rebecca Reynolds & Catherine McGowan, 2022. "Sins of omission: Critical informatics perspectives on privacy in e‐learning systems in higher education," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(5), pages 708-725, May.
    31. Lynette Kvasny & Fay Cobb Payton, 2018. "Managing Hypervisibility in the HIV Prevention Information†Seeking Practices of Black Female College Students," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(6), pages 798-806, June.
    32. Jessa Lingel & danah boyd, 2013. "“Keep it secret, keep it safe”: Information poverty, information norms, and stigma," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(5), pages 981-991, May.
    33. Kyle M. L. Jones & Andrew Asher & Abigail Goben & Michael R. Perry & Dorothea Salo & Kristin A. Briney & M. Brooke Robertshaw, 2020. "“We're being tracked at all times”: Student perspectives of their privacy in relation to learning analytics in higher education," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 1044-1059, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Zimmer & Jessica Vitak & Philip Wu, 2020. "Editorial introduction: “Information privacy in the digital age”," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 997-1001, September.
    2. Raphaël Gellert, 2022. "Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 156-176, January.
    3. Vanessa L. Kitzie & Travis L. Wagner & Valerie Lookingbill & Nicolas Vera, 2022. "Advancing information practices theoretical discourses centered on marginality, community, and embodiment: Learning from the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and as," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 494-510, April.
    4. Wayne de Fremery & Michael K. Buckland, 2022. "Copy theory," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 407-418, March.
    5. Rebecca Reynolds & Julie Aromi & Catherine McGowan & Britt Paris, 2022. "Digital divide, critical‐, and crisis‐informatics perspectives on K‐12 emergency remote teaching during the pandemic," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(12), pages 1665-1680, December.
    6. Isto Huvila, 2022. "Making and taking information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 528-541, April.
    7. Kebede, Gashaw, 2010. "Knowledge management: An information science perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 416-424.
    8. Cornelius, Kristin B., 2019. "Zombie contracts, dark patterns of design, and 'documentisation'," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25.
    9. Deepti Mishra & Alok Mishra, 2020. "Sustainability Inclusion in Informatics Curriculum Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Darrin Baines & Robert J R Elliott, 2020. "Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic," Discussion Papers 20-06, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    11. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2022. "Organizations decentered: data objects, technology and knowledge," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Teichmann, Fabian & Boticiu, Sonia & Sergi, Bruno S., 2023. "RegTech – Potential benefits and challenges for businesses," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Jeremy Pitt & Daniel Ramirez-Cano & Moez Draief & Alexander Artikis, 2011. "Interleaving multi-agent systems and social networks for organized adaptation," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 344-378, November.
    14. Hicks, Alison, 2022. "The missing link: Towards an integrated health and information literacy research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Darin Freeburg, 2019. "The Knowing Model: Facilitating Behaviour Change in Organisations," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Kirsten Martin, 2023. "Predatory predictions and the ethics of predictive analytics," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(5), pages 531-545, May.
    17. Isto Huvila, 2020. "Use-Oriented Information and Knowledge Management: Information Production and Use Practices as an Element of the Value and Impact of Information," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Yonit Rusho & Daphne R. Raban, 2020. "Hands on: Information Experiences as Sources of Value," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 671-684, June.
    19. Jannica Heinström & Eero Sormunen & Reijo Savolainen & Stefan Ek, 2020. "Developing an empirical measure of everyday information mastering," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(7), pages 729-741, July.
    20. Michael B. Twidale & David M. Nichols & Christopher P. Lueg, 2021. "Everyone everywhere: A distributed and embedded paradigm for usability," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1272-1284, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:4:p:444-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.