IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v24y2022i4d10.1057_s41278-022-00224-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the implementation of governance best practices by Latin American ports

Author

Listed:
  • Maria D. Gracia

    (Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas)

  • Rosa G. González-Ramírez

    (Universidad de Los Andes, Chile)

  • Luis M. Ascencio

    (Universidad de Los Andes, Chile)

  • Julio Mar-Ortiz

    (Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas)

Abstract

In this paper, a semi-structured interview approach is used to assess governance and institutionalist practices promoted among successful port systems worldwide, in Latin American ports. The aim is to provide recommendations that would allow Latin American ports to reach high performance scores through governance practices, and face the challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, fostering a more resilient port ecosystem. A three-stage methodological framework, composed of six steps, is proposed. In the first stage, semi-structured interviews were carried out, with a total of 178 participants, to assess the state of implementation of governance practices in 24 Latin American ports. These practices were identified from a literature review and are promoted among successful port systems worldwide. In a second stage, the relationship between governance practices in ports and their performance was analyzed, aiming to identify those governance and institutionalist strategies that are most extensively used by the best performing ports. Finally, in a third stage, we provide recommendations that would allow Latin American ports to reach high performance scores through improved governance practices. The results indicate that digitalization and coordination among the stakeholders of the port logistics community are two of the most cited governance practices in the best performing Latin American ports. This paper contributes to the theory of port governance in Latin America, by empirically relating and identifying those governance practices which contribute to port performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria D. Gracia & Rosa G. González-Ramírez & Luis M. Ascencio & Julio Mar-Ortiz, 2022. "Assessing the implementation of governance best practices by Latin American ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(4), pages 806-834, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:24:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1057_s41278-022-00224-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41278-022-00224-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-022-00224-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41278-022-00224-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo J Sánchez & Jan Hoffmann & Alejandro Micco & Georgina V Pizzolitto & Martín Sgut & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2003. "Port Efficiency and International Trade: Port Efficiency as a Determinant of Maritime Transport Costs," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(2), pages 199-218, June.
    2. Coronado Mondragon, Adrian E. & Coronado Mondragon, Christian E. & Coronado, Etienne S., 2017. "ICT adoption in multimodal transport sites: Investigating institutional-related influences in international seaports terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 69-88.
    3. Dalwon Kang & Sihyun Kim, 2017. "Conceptual Model Development of Sustainability Practices: The Case of Port Operations for Collaboration and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Debrie, Jean & Fremont, Antoine & Gouvernal, Elisabeth, 2010. "Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 519-529.
    5. Monios, Jason, 2019. "Polycentric port governance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-36.
    6. Helfat, Constance E. & Raubitschek, Ruth S., 2018. "Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1391-1399.
    7. Jeffrey Martin & Brian J. Thomas, 2001. "The container terminal community," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 279-292, July.
    8. Theo E. Notteboom & Hercules E. Haralambides, 2020. "Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 329-352, September.
    9. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Hoffmann, Jan & Sanchez, Ricardo J., 2006. "The Impact of Port Characteristics on International Maritime Transport Costs," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 117-140, January.
    10. Tzay-An Shiau & Chia-Chin Chuang, 2015. "Social construction of port sustainability indicators: a case study of Keelung Port," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 26-42, January.
    11. Martijn R Van Der Horst & Peter W De Langen, 2008. "Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 108-129, March.
    12. Peter W. de Langen & Henrik Sornn-Friese & James Hallworth, 2020. "The Role of Port Development Companies in Transitioning the Port Business Ecosystem; The Case of Port of Amsterdam’s Circular Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Maria Rosa Pires da Cruz & João J Ferreira & Susana Garrido Azevedo, 2013. "Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(4), pages 416-443, December.
    14. Dooms, Michael & Verbeke, Alain & Haezendonck, Elvira, 2013. "Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: the port of Antwerp case (1960–2010)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 14-25.
    15. Peter W. de Langen & Christiaan Heij, 2014. "Corporatisation and Performance: A Literature Review and an Analysis of the Performance Effects of the Corporatisation of Port of Rotterdam Authority," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 396-414, May.
    16. Clott, Christopher & Hartman, Bruce C., 2016. "Supply chain integration, landside operations and port accessibility in metropolitan Chicago," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 130-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julián Martínez Moya & María Feo Valero, 2017. "Port choice in container market: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 300-321, May.
    2. Jacobsson, Stefan & Arnäs, Per Olof & Stefansson, Gunnar, 2018. "Differentiation of access management services at seaport terminals: Facilitating potential improvements for road hauliers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 256-264.
    3. Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Ducruet, César & Jacobs, Wouter & Monios, Jason & Notteboom, Theo & Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Slack, Brian & Tam, Ka-chai & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2014. "Port geography at the crossroads with human geography: between flows and spaces," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 84-96.
    4. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Jason Monios & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2014. "The Impact of Container Type Diversification on Regional British Port Development Strategies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 583-606, September.
    7. Marion Magnan & Martijn Horst, 2020. "Involvement of port authorities in inland logistics markets: the cases of Rotterdam, Le Havre and Marseille," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 102-123, March.
    8. Michalis P. Michaelides & Herodotos Herodotou & Mikael Lind & Richard T. Watson, 2019. "Port-2-Port Communication Enhancing Short Sea Shipping Performance: The Case Study of Cyprus and the Eastern Mediterranean," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Pierre CARIOU & Gabriel FIGUEIREDO DE OLIVEIRA, 2015. "Les Déterminants De L'Efficience Portuaire : Une Analyse Des Ports À Conteneurs Méditerranéens," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 41, pages 83-99.
    10. Nicolas Raimbault & Wouter Jacobs & Frank van Dongen, 2016. "Port regionalisation from a relational perspective: the rise of Venlo as dutch international logistics hub," Post-Print hal-01740678, HAL.
    11. Abisai Konstantinus & Mark Zuidgeest & Anastasia Christodoulou & Zeeshan Raza & Johan Woxenius, 2019. "Barriers and Enablers for Short Sea Shipping in the Southern African Development Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Olaf Jonkeren & Erhan Demirel & Jos van Ommeren & Piet Rietveld, 2011. "Endogenous transport prices and trade imbalances," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 509-527, May.
    13. Elvira Haezendonck & Karel Van den Berghe, 2020. "Patterns of Circular Transition: What Is the Circular Economy Maturity of Belgian Ports?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Jordan Schwartz & José Luis Guasch & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2009. "Logistics, Transport and Food Prices in LAC: Policy Guidance for Improving Efficiency and Reducing Costs," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9324, Inter-American Development Bank.
    15. Theo E. Notteboom & Hercules E. Haralambides, 2020. "Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 329-352, September.
    16. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh, 2022. "Spatial Network Analysis of Container Port Operations: The Case of Ship Turnaround Times," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 883-902, December.
    17. Nicolas Raimbault & Wouter Jacobs & Frank Dongen, 2016. "Port Regionalisation from a Relational Perspective: The Rise of Venlo as Dutch International Logistics Hub," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(1), pages 16-32, February.
    18. -, 2013. "Perspectivas económicas de América Latina 2014: logística y competitividad para el desarrollo," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 1504 edited by Ocde, July.
    19. Henttu, Ville & Hilmola, Olli-Pekka, 2011. "Financial and environmental impacts of hypothetical Finnish dry port structure," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 35-41.
    20. Jimenez, Manuel, 2020. "Trade Costs and Mark-Ups in Maritime Shipping," Conference papers 333182, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:24:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1057_s41278-022-00224-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.