IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v61y2010i6d10.1057_jors.2010.10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment evaluation within project management: an information systems perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Z Irani

    (Brunel Business School, Brunel University)

Abstract

This paper is seeking to make a contribution through exploring project management from the perspective of information systems (IS) investment evaluation. Organizational investments in IS are significant in financial terms and, as a result, management would appear set to increasingly scrutinize such expenditure through tighter forms of decision-making and corporate governance. In turn, this has increased the motivation of project managers to appropriately evaluate the impact of their IS before, during and after the investments are signed off. This perspective is not restricted to any one industry sector, with the author seeking motivation for a better understanding of investment evaluation within a project management context. This paper sets out to explain why and how investment evaluation should be embedded in project management in order to support an increase in the effectiveness of project management, thereby increasing the prospects of project success. While doing so, the reader will be provided with several touch-points that serve to outline the purpose and challenges facing those seeking to evaluate their investments. The author starts off with a contextualization of project management and its phased activities, such that a clear understanding of the contribution that investment evaluation plays within robust project management can be demonstrated. Then, the perspective of investment versus consumption is presented, grounded within the strategic grid, which classifies information technology-based projects as either: strategic, turnaround, factory or support. The author then presents evaluation as a life-cycle process, where evaluation is classified into four distinctive phases, namely ex-ante evaluation, metrics, command and control and ex-post evaluation, in doing so, emphasizing that evaluation needs to be seen as a process that runs through the life cycle of a project rather than as a hurdle that needs to be cleared to ensure financial approval.

Suggested Citation

  • Z Irani, 2010. "Investment evaluation within project management: an information systems perspective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 917-928, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:61:y:2010:i:6:d:10.1057_jors.2010.10
    DOI: 10.1057/jors.2010.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/jors.2010.10
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/jors.2010.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Yaseen, Hussein & Eldabi, Tillal & Lees, David Y. & Paul, Ray J., 2006. "Operational Use evaluation of IT investments: An investigation into potential benefits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 1000-1011, September.
    2. Hobday, Mike, 2000. "The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 871-893, August.
    3. Kent D. Miller & Andaç T. Arikan, 2004. "Technology search investments: evolutionary, option reasoning, and option pricing approaches," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 473-485, May.
    4. Irani, Zahir & Sharif, Amir & Love, Peter E. D. & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2002. "Applying concepts of fuzzy cognitive mapping to model: The IT/IS investment evaluation process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1-2), pages 199-211, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zon-Yau Lee & Mei-Tai Chu & Shiuann-Shuoh Chen & Chih-Hung Tsai, 2018. "Identifying Comprehensive Key Criteria of Sustainable Development for Traditional Manufacturing in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Huynh, Minh-Tay & Nippa, Michael & Aichner, Thomas, 2023. "Big data analytics capabilities: Patchwork or progress? A systematic review of the status quo and implications for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Braganza, Ashley & Brooks, Laurence & Nepelski, Daniel & Ali, Maged & Moro, Russ, 2017. "Resource management in big data initiatives: Processes and dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 328-337.
    4. Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & Irani, Zahir & Weerakkody, Vishanth, 2017. "Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 263-286.
    5. Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Akter, Shahriar & Ren, Steven Ji-fan & Dubey, Rameshwar & Childe, Stephen J., 2017. "Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 356-365.
    6. Haffar, Mohamed & Al-Karaghouli, Wafi & Irani, Zahir & Djebarni, Ramdane & Gbadamosi, Gbolahan, 2019. "The influence of individual readiness for change dimensions on quality management implementation in Algerian manufacturing organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 247-260.
    7. Jones, Steve, 2015. "Cloud computing procurement and implementation: Lessons learnt from a United Kingdom case study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 712-716.
    8. Hans Ulrich Buhl & Björn Steven Häckel & Florian Probst & Josef Schosser, 2016. "On the Ex Ante Valuation of IT Service Investments," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(6), pages 415-432, December.
    9. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Dubey, Rameshwar & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Childe, Stephen J. & Hazen, Benjamin & Akter, Shahriar, 2017. "Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 308-317.
    10. Jones, Steve, 2012. "eGovernment Document Management System: A case analysis of risk and reward," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 396-400.
    11. Steve Jones & Zahir Irani & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Peter E. D. Love, 2019. "Risks and rewards of cloud computing in the UK public sector: A reflection on three Organisational case studies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 359-382, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blindenbach-Driessen, Floortje & van den Ende, Jan, 2006. "Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 545-561, May.
    2. Casper, Steven & Whitley, Richard, 2004. "Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 89-106, January.
    3. Parker, Owen N. & Mui, Rachel & Bhawe, Nachiket & Semadeni, Matthew, 2022. "Insight or ignorance: How collaborative history in a workgroup fits with project type to shape performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 154-167.
    4. Prencipe, Andrea & Tell, Fredrik, 2001. "Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1373-1394, December.
    5. Pantic-Dragisic, Svjetlana & Söderlund, Jonas, 2020. "Swift transition and knowledge cycling: Key capabilities for successful technical and engineering consulting?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    6. GRIMM, Nina, 2014. "The Need of Project Capabilities in Project Based Organizations," Romanian Distribution Committee Magazine, Romanian Distribution Committee, vol. 5(1), pages 24-29, March.
    7. Dedy Dewanto, 2022. "The characteristic of leader innovativeness, a case in Indonesian’s construction industry," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(8), pages 153-165, November.
    8. Renaud Bellais & Renelle Guichard, 2006. "Defense Innovation, Technology Transfers And Public Policy," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 273-286.
    9. John Qi Dong, 2021. "Technological choices under uncertainty: Does organizational aspiration matter?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 898-916, May.
    10. Fan, Miao & Lin, Neng-Pai & Sheu, Chwen, 2008. "Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: An analytical model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 700-713, April.
    11. Gilberto SERAVALLI, 2011. "Conflict, Contract, Leadership and Innovation: An Interdisciplinary View," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 1(6), pages 1-48, October.
    12. Peter Maskell & Mark Lorenzen, 2004. "The Cluster as Market Organisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(5-6), pages 991-1009, May.
    13. Peter B. Doeringer & Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2013. "Project-based industries and craft-like production: structure, location and performance," Chapters, in: Frank Giarratani & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Philip McCann (ed.), Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography, chapter 4, pages 99-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Rocco Agrifoglio & Concetta Metallo & Primiano Nauta, 2021. "Understanding Knowledge Management in Public Organizations through the Organizational Knowing Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    15. Chagas Jr., Milton de Freitas & Leite, Dinah Eluze Sales & Jesus, Gabriel Torres de, 2017. "“Processos acoplados” como capacidades dinâmicas na integração de sistemas," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 57(3), May.
    16. Dawn Gilbert & Mike Yearworth, 2016. "Complexity in a Systems Engineering Organization: An Empirical Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 422-435, September.
    17. Al-Yaseen, Hussein & Eldabi, Tillal & Lees, David Y. & Paul, Ray J., 2006. "Operational Use evaluation of IT investments: An investigation into potential benefits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 1000-1011, September.
    18. Lema, Rasmus, 2010. "Adoption of Open Business Models in the West and Innovation in India's Software Industry," MPRA Paper 49589, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Buckley, Peter J. & Craig, Thomas D. & Mudambi, Ram, 2019. "Time to learn? Assignment duration in global value chain organization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 508-518.
    20. Miozzo, Marcela & Grimshaw, Damian, 2005. "Modularity and innovation in knowledge-intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1419-1439, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:61:y:2010:i:6:d:10.1057_jors.2010.10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.