IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/assmgt/v17y2016i6d10.1057_s41260-016-0024-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing and hedging competitiveness of the tree option pricing models: Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Vipul Kumar Singh

    (National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE))

Abstract

The study focusses on the price convergences, implied volatility structures, and hedging competencies of the discrete tree options pricing models. In addition, the paper also studies the efficiency of optimization techniques involved in the calibration of discrete time models. The process involves matching of quoted market option prices with the model prices – relied on the assumption that there are sufficiently large numbers of liquidly traded options. To minimize the price bias between the model and market, this paper uses Differential Evolution and Simulated Annealing methods of optimization. To benchmark, price statistics of European-style Nifty index options and American-style stock options traded on the National Stock Exchange (the world’s third largest Futures and Options exchange) of India have been used. The concepts of optimization and relative pricing are used to demonstrate the price effectiveness of the tree models with respect to continuous-time classical options pricing model of Black–Scholes–Merton. The outcome of the research reveals that the pricing and hedging errors of forward-inducted implied that binomial and trinomial trees are stable and lower with Simulated Annealing methods of optimization than their backward-inducted counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Vipul Kumar Singh, 2016. "Pricing and hedging competitiveness of the tree option pricing models: Evidence from India," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(6), pages 453-475, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:17:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1057_s41260-016-0024-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41260-016-0024-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41260-016-0024-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41260-016-0024-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jens Carsten Jackwerth., 1996. "Generalized Binomial Trees," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-264, University of California at Berkeley.
    2. Boyle, Phelim P., 1988. "A Lattice Framework for Option Pricing with Two State Variables," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Dietmar Leisen & Matthias Reimer, 1996. "Binomial models for option valuation - examining and improving convergence," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 319-346.
    4. Omberg, Edward, 1987. "A Note on the Convergence of Binomial-Pricing and Compound-Option," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(2), pages 463-469, June.
    5. Merton, Robert C., 1976. "Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1-2), pages 125-144.
    6. Robert C. Merton, 2005. "Theory of rational option pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 8, pages 229-288, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Kian Guan Lim & Da Zhi, 2002. "Pricing options using implied trees: Evidence from FTSE‐100 options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(7), pages 601-626, July.
    8. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    9. Rubinstein, Mark, 1994. "Implied Binomial Trees," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(3), pages 771-818, July.
    10. Mark Rubinstein., 1994. "Implied Binomial Trees," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-232, University of California at Berkeley.
    11. Yisong “Sam” Tian, 1999. "A flexible binomial option pricing model," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(7), pages 817-843, October.
    12. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarno Talponen & Minna Turunen, 2022. "Option pricing: a yet simpler approach," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 45(1), pages 57-81, June.
    2. Mondher Bellalah, 2009. "Derivatives, Risk Management & Value," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 7175, January.
    3. Yuan Hu & W. Brent Lindquist & Svetlozar T. Rachev & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2023. "Option pricing using a skew random walk pricing tree," Papers 2303.17014, arXiv.org.
    4. U Hou Lok & Yuh‐Dauh Lyuu, 2020. "Efficient trinomial trees for local‐volatility models in pricing double‐barrier options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 556-574, April.
    5. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    6. Constantinides, George M. & Jackwerth, Jens Carsten & Perrakis, Stylianos, 2005. "Option pricing: Real and risk-neutral distributions," CoFE Discussion Papers 05/06, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    7. Carl Chiarella & Xue-Zhong He & Christina Sklibosios Nikitopoulos, 2015. "Derivative Security Pricing," Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-662-45906-5, July-Dece.
    8. Elyas Elyasiani & Silvia Muzzioli & Alessio Ruggieri, 2016. "Forecasting and pricing powers of option-implied tree models: Tranquil and volatile market conditions," Department of Economics 0099, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    9. Felipe Isaza Cuervo & Sergio Botero Boterob, 2014. "Aplicación de las opciones reales en la toma de decisiones en los mercados de electricidad," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, November.
    10. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    11. Jarno Talponen & Minna Turunen, 2017. "Option pricing: A yet simpler approach," Papers 1705.00212, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    12. Lishang Jiang & Qihong Chen & Lijun Wang & Jin Zhang, 2003. "A new well-posed algorithm to recover implied local volatility," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(6), pages 451-457.
    13. Omid M. Ardakani, 2022. "Option pricing with maximum entropy densities: The inclusion of higher‐order moments," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(10), pages 1821-1836, October.
    14. U Hou Lok & Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, 2022. "A Valid and Efficient Trinomial Tree for General Local-Volatility Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 817-832, October.
    15. Jackwerth, Jens Carsten & Rubinstein, Mark, 2003. "Recovering Probabilities and Risk Aversion from Option Prices and Realized Returns," MPRA Paper 11638, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2004.
    16. Dasheng Ji & B. Brorsen, 2011. "A recombining lattice option pricing model that relaxes the assumption of lognormality," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 349-367, October.
    17. Siddiqi, Hammad, 2014. "The Financial Market Consequences of Growing Awareness: The Case of Implied Volatiltiy Skew," Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers 162568, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    18. René Garcia & Eric Ghysels & Eric Renault, 2004. "The Econometrics of Option Pricing," CIRANO Working Papers 2004s-04, CIRANO.
    19. Davide Lauria & W. Brent Lindquist & Svetlozar T. Rachev & Yuan Hu, 2023. "Unifying Market Microstructure and Dynamic Asset Pricing," Papers 2304.02356, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    20. Josheski Dushko & Apostolov Mico, 2020. "A Review of the Binomial and Trinomial Models for Option Pricing and their Convergence to the Black-Scholes Model Determined Option Prices," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 24(2), pages 53-85, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    binomial; Black–Scholes; implied volatility; Nifty index; options; optimization; trinomial;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:17:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1057_s41260-016-0024-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.