IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apmtfi/v3y1996i4p319-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Binomial models for option valuation - examining and improving convergence

Author

Listed:
  • Dietmar Leisen
  • Matthias Reimer

Abstract

Binomial models, which describe the asset price dynamics of the continuous-time model in the limit, serve for approximate valuation of options, especially where formulas cannot be derived analytically due to properties of the considered option type. To evaluate results, one inevitably must understand the convergence properties. In the literature we find various contributions proving convergence of option prices. We examine convergence behaviour and convergence speed. Unfortunately, even in the case of European call options, distorted results occur when calculating prices along the iteration of tree refinements. These convergence patterns are examined and order of convergence one is proven for the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein model as well as for two alternative tree parameter selections from the literature. Furthermore, we define new binomial models, where the calculated option prices converge smoothly to the Black-Scholes solution, and we achieve order of convergence two with much smaller initial error. Notably, only the formulas to determine the up- and down-factors change. Finally, following a recent approach from the literature, all tree approaches are compared with respect to speed and accuracy, calculating the relative root-mean-squared error of approximate option values for a sample of randomly selected parameters across a set of refinements. Here, on average, the same degree of accuracy is achieved 1400 times faster with the new binomial models. We also give some insights into the peculiarities in the valuation of the American put option. Inspecting the numerical results, the approximation of American-type options with the new models exhibits order of convergence one, but with a smaller initial error than with previously existing binomial models, giving the same accuracy on average ten-times faster than previous binomial methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Dietmar Leisen & Matthias Reimer, 1996. "Binomial models for option valuation - examining and improving convergence," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 319-346.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:3:y:1996:i:4:p:319-346
    DOI: 10.1080/13504869600000015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504869600000015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504869600000015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nelson, Daniel B & Ramaswamy, Krishna, 1990. "Simple Binomial Processes as Diffusion Approximations in Financial Models," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 3(3), pages 393-430.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenbin Wang & Mark E. Ferguson & Shanshan Hu & Gilvan C. Souza, 2013. "Dynamic Capacity Investment with Two Competing Technologies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 616-629, October.
    2. Anlong Li, 1992. "Binomial approximation in financial models: computational simplicity and convergence," Working Papers (Old Series) 9201, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    3. Damiano Brigo, 2008. "The general mixture-diffusion SDE and its relationship with an uncertain-volatility option model with volatility-asset decorrelation," Papers 0812.4052, arXiv.org.
    4. Hi Jun Choe & Jeong Ho Chu & So Jeong Shin, 2014. "Recombining binomial tree for constant elasticity of variance process," Papers 1410.5955, arXiv.org.
    5. Rosa Ferrentino & Luca Vota, 2022. "A Mathematical Model for the Pricing of Derivative Financial Products: the Role of the Banking Supervision and of the Model Risk," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 1-2.
    6. Wael Bahsoun & Pawel Góra & Silvia Mayoral & Manuel Morales, 2006. "Random Dynamics and Finance: Constructing Implied Binomial Trees from a Predetermined Stationary Den," Faculty Working Papers 13/06, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.
    7. Kumar Muthuraman & Tarik Aouam & Ronald Rardin, 2008. "Regulation of Natural Gas Distribution Using Policy Benchmarks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1131-1145, October.
    8. Hibiki Ichiue & Yoichi Ueno, 2007. "Equilibrium Interest Rate and the Yield Curve in a Low Interest Rate Environment," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 07-E-18, Bank of Japan.
    9. Maria B. Chiarolla & Tiziano Angelis & Gabriele Stabile, 2022. "An analytical study of participating policies with minimum rate guarantee and surrender option," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 173-216, April.
    10. Ariste, Ruolz & Lasserre, Pierre, 2001. "La gestion optimale d’une forêt exploitée pour son potentiel de diminution des gaz à effet de serre et son bois," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 77(1), pages 27-51, mars.
    11. Carol Alexander & Xi Chen, 2021. "Model risk in real option valuation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 1025-1056, April.
    12. Werner Hürlimann, 2012. "Valuation of fixed and variable rate mortgages: binomial tree versus analytical approximations," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 35(2), pages 171-202, November.
    13. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    14. Li, Chenxu & Ye, Yongxin, 2019. "Pricing and Exercising American Options: an Asymptotic Expansion Approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Jin-Yu Zhang & Wen-Bo Wu & Yong Li & Zhu-Sheng Lou, 2021. "Pricing Exotic Option Under Jump-Diffusion Models by the Quadrature Method," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 867-884, October.
    16. Sandra Peterson & Richard C. Stapleton & Marti G. Subrahmanyam, 1999. "The Valuation of American-Style Swaptions in a Two-factor Spot-Futures Model," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires 99-078, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-.
    17. Paolo Angelis & Roberto Marchis & Antonio L. Martire & Emilio Russo, 2022. "A flexible lattice framework for valuing options on assets paying discrete dividends and variable annuities embedding GMWB riders," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 45(1), pages 415-446, June.
    18. Andrea Beltratti & Paolo Colla, 2007. "A portfolio-based evaluation of affine term structure models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 193-222, April.
    19. Giulia De Rossi & Tiziano Vargiolu, 2010. "Optimal prepayment and default rules for mortgage-backed securities," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 33(1), pages 23-47, May.
    20. Ruxing Xu & Dan Wu & Ronghua Yi, 2016. "Pricing Cdss And Cds Options Under A Regime-Switching Cev Process With Jump To Default," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(1), pages 253-271.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:3:y:1996:i:4:p:319-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAMF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.