IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v31y2009i2p331-343..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Laboratory Science Approach to Teaching in the Agricultural Economics Curriculum

Author

Listed:
  • Norbert L.W. Wilson
  • Robert G. Nelson

Abstract

We argue that economic laboratory experiments can facilitate active learning of theory in the agricultural economics curriculum by placing students in decision-making roles. Three types of experimental protocols are described, along with a discussion of the costs and benefits of experiments. The Double Auction Experiment provides a platform for demonstrating concepts of equilibrium, price discovery, externalities, excess supply, surplus, and speculation. The Monopoly Experiment is a platform for demonstrating concepts of advance production, inventory carryover, monopoly pricing, and search strategies. The Oligopoly Experiment is a platform for demonstrating concepts of thin markets, coordination, and imperfectly competitive equilibria.

Suggested Citation

  • Norbert L.W. Wilson & Robert G. Nelson, 2009. "A Laboratory Science Approach to Teaching in the Agricultural Economics Curriculum," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 331-343.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:331-343.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01440.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heiman, Amir & Miranowski, John A. & Zilberman, David & Alix-Garcia, Jennifer Marie, 2002. "The Increasing Role Of Agribusiness In Agricultural Economics," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30.
    2. William M. Park & Burton C. English & Morgan D. Gray & Charles L. Cleland, 1995. "Experiential Learning through Participation in Green Revolution/Exaction: A Role-Playing Simulation," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 17(3), pages 257-265.
    3. Roger A. Dahlgran, 1987. "Management simulators: A tool for fostering experience-based learning of agribusiness management concepts," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(4), pages 403-412.
    4. Michael A. Boland & Jay T. Akridge, 2004. "Undergraduate Agribusiness Programs: Focus or Falter? ," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(4), pages 564-578.
    5. Michael J. Haupert, 1996. "An Experiment in Comparative Advantage," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 37-44, January.
    6. Stephen R. Koontz & Derrell S. Peel & James N. Trapp & Clement E. Ward, 1995. "Augmenting Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness Education with Experiential Learning," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 17(3), pages 267-274.
    7. Nelson, Robert G. & Wilson, Norbert L.W., 2003. "“It's for Teaching, not Believing†: Comments on Teaching, Learning, and Problem Solving Through Economic Experiments," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 361-370, August.
    8. Samuel M. Curtis, 1968. "The Use of a Business Game for Teaching Farm Business Analysis to High School and Adult Students," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1025-1033.
    9. Philip Garcia & Carl H. Nelson, 2003. "Engaging Students in Research: The Use of Professional Dialogue," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 569-577.
    10. Mike Ellerbrock & Marjorie Norton, 2000. "Epistemological Foundations of Teaching and Learning through the Land-Grant System," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 218-227.
    11. Davis, Douglas D. & Holt, Charles a., 1993. "Experimental economics: Methods, problems and promise," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 8(2), pages 179-212.
    12. Trapp, James N., 1989. "A Commodity Market Simulation Game for Teaching Market Risk Management," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 139-147, July.
    13. Brauer, Jurgen & Delemeester, Greg, 2001. "Games Economists Play: A Survey of Non-computerized Classroom-Games for College Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 221-236, April.
    14. Blank, Steven C., 1985. "Effectiveness Of Role Playing, Case Studies, And Simulation Games In Teaching Agricultural Economics," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, July.
    15. Trapp, James N., 1989. "A Commodity Market Simulation Game For Teaching Market Risk Management," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-9, July.
    16. Noelwah R. Netusil, 2000. "Variations on a Theme: The Double-Oral Auction Market and Voluntary Contribution Mechanism Experiments," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 267-284.
    17. Chris Bastian & Larry VanTassell & Karen Williams & Dale Menkhaus & Larry Held, 1997. "Active Learning with Monetary Incentives," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 475-483.
    18. Smith, Vernon L & Suchanek, Gerry L & Williams, Arlington W, 1988. "Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(5), pages 1119-1151, September.
    19. Michael E. Wetzstein, 1988. "An Organonic and Modern Problems Approach for Teaching Agricultural Economics Principles," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(1), pages 63-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Berning, Joshua P., 2014. "Using self-reported data collection and analysis to facilitate student learning: A case study," 2014 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2014, Dallas, Texas 162482, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramsey, A. Ford & Isengildina-Massa, Olga, 2021. "Evaluation of Learning Outcomes from Participation in a Student-Managed Commodity Investment Fund," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2(6), January.
    2. Nuzzo, Simone & Morone, Andrea, 2017. "Asset markets in the lab: A literature review," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 42-50.
    3. Larry S. Lev & Robert P. King, 1995. "MarketTools: An educational commodity marketing game," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 187-193.
    4. Nelson, Robert G. & Wilson, Norbert L.W., 2008. "Evaluating Teaching Methods: Is It Worth Doing Right?," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6810, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Caginalp, Carey & Caginalp, Gunduz, 2019. "Stochastic asset price dynamics and volatility using a symmetric supply and demand price equation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 807-824.
    6. Katerina Sherstyuk & Krit Phankitnirundorn & Michael J. Roberts, 2021. "Randomized double auctions: gains from trade, trader roles, and price discovery," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(4), pages 1325-1364, December.
    7. Inoua, Sabiou M. & Smith, Vernon L., 2023. "A classical model of speculative asset price dynamics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    8. Lowell D. Hill & Karen L. Bender, 1996. "Industry note: Market simulation for teaching commodity trading skills," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 403-410.
    9. Larson, Ronald B., 2013. "Addressing the Needs of the Agribusiness “Fringe”," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150805, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Vernon L. Smith & Sabiou M. Inoua, 2019. "Classical Economics: Lost and Found," Working Papers 19-15, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    11. Larry Bensimhon & Yuri Biondi, 2013. "Financial Bubbles, Common Knowledge and Alternative Accounting Regimes: An Experimental Analysis of Artificial Spot Security Markets," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 3, pages 21-59, December.
    12. David T. Mitchell & Robert P. Rebelein & Patricia H. Schneider & Nicole B. Simpson & Eric Fisher, 2009. "A Classroom Experiment on Exchange Rate Determination with Purchasing Power Parity," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 150-165, April.
    13. Weber, Martin & Keppe, Hans-Jurgen & Meyer-Delius, Gabriela, 2000. "The impact of endowment framing on market prices -- an experimental analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 159-176, February.
    14. Vernon L. Smith, 2020. "Causal versus Consequential Motives in Mental Models of Agent Social and Economic Action: Experiments, and the Neoclassical Diversion in Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 341-370, August.
    15. Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler & Matthias Sutter, 2006. "Vom Nutzen zusätzlicher Information auf Märkten mit unterschiedlich informierten Händlern — Eine experimentelle Studie," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 188-211, March.
    16. Tomek, William G. & Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa, 2000. "Risk Management In Agricultural Markets: A Survey," 2000 Producer Marketing and Risk Management Conference, January 13-14, Orlando, FL 19580, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Brian Albrecht & Omar Al-Ubaydli & Peter Boettke, 2022. "Testing the Hayek hypothesis: Recent theoretical and experimental evidence," Artefactual Field Experiments 00759, The Field Experiments Website.
    18. Iván Barreda-Tarrazona & Juan Matallín-Sáez & Mª Balaguer-Franch, 2011. "Measuring Investors’ Socially Responsible Preferences in Mutual Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 305-330, October.
    19. Dunne, AJ, 2010. "Contemporary Issues in the Provision of Tertiary Agriculture Programs: A Case Study of The University of Queensland," Papers 234281, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment.
    20. Smith, Vernon L., 2010. "Theory and experiment: What are the questions?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 3-15, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:331-343.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.