IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecinqu/v38y2000i4p570-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rebates, Inventories, and Intertemporal Price Discrimination

Author

Listed:
  • Ault, Richard W, et al

Abstract

We demonstrate that universally redeemed rebates can increase manufacturer profits by reducing the incentives of downstream retailers to hoard inventories when optimal wholesale prices vary predictably over time. By bypassing retailers and making direct contracts with buyers, the manufacturer can increase the variations in effective prices paid by consumers without concomitantly creating larger incentives for retailers to hold inventories. During profitable, high-demand periods, manufacturer revenues are ordinarily constrained by "competition" from retailer inventories, thus limiting profits. However, by selectively offering rebates to consumers while maintaining high wholesale prices, low-demand periods can be accommodated without inducing retailer hoarding. Copyright 2000 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ault, Richard W, et al, 2000. "Rebates, Inventories, and Intertemporal Price Discrimination," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 38(4), pages 570-578, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:38:y:2000:i:4:p:570-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Sigué, Simon-Pierre, 2015. "Trade deals and/or on-package coupons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 541-554.
    2. Caliskan-Demirag, Ozgun & (Frank) Chen, Youhua & Li, Jianbin, 2011. "Customer and retailer rebates under risk aversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 736-750, October.
    3. Zhang, Jianqiang, 2016. "The benefits of consumer rebates: A strategy for gray market deterrence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 509-521.
    4. Andrew Sfekas & Dean R. Lillard, 2013. "Do Firms Use Coupons and In-store Discounts to Strategically Market Experience Goods Over the Consumption Life-Cycle? The Case of Cigarettes," NBER Working Papers 19310, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Scott M. Gilpatric, 2009. "Slippage in Rebate Programs and Present-Biased Preferences," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 229-238, 03-04.
    6. Xin Chen & Chung‐Lun Li & Byong‐Duk Rhee & David Simchi‐Levi, 2007. "The impact of manufacturer rebates on supply chain profits," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(6), pages 667-680, September.
    7. Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Sigué, Simon-Pierre & Zaccour, Georges, 2010. "The Dilemma of Pull and Push-Price Promotions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 51-68.
    8. Winston Koh, 2006. "The micro-foundations of intertemporal price discrimination," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 27(2), pages 393-410, January.
    9. Samir Mamadehussene, 2024. "Rebates Offered by a Multiproduct Firm," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 178-191, January.
    10. Winston T. H. Koh, 2005. "Household Demand, Network Externality Effects and Intertemporal Price Discrimination," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 49-69, February.
    11. Lin, Zhibing, 2016. "Price promotion with reference price effects in supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 52-68.
    12. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2013. "Managing Strategic Inventories via Manufacturer-to-Consumer Rebates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 813-818, April.
    13. Liang, Donghan & Li, Gang & Sun, Linyan & Chen, Yubao, 2013. "The role of rebates in the hybrid competition between a national brand and a private label with present-biased consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 208-219.
    14. Chaudhuri, Malika & Calantone, Roger J. & Voorhees, Clay M. & Cockrell, Seth, 2018. "Disentangling the effects of promotion mix on new product sales: An examination of disaggregated drivers and the moderating effect of product class," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 286-294.
    15. MartI´n-Herrán, Guiomar & Sigué, Simon P., 2011. "Prices, promotions, and channel profitability: Was the conventional wisdom mistaken?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 415-425, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:38:y:2000:i:4:p:570-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.