IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v21y1997i2p197-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Regulation of Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Germany: Market Rules, Legal Norms and Technical Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Lane, Christel

Abstract

An analysis of institutionalized rule systems, particularly of technical standards, traces their effects on various aspects of supplier relations in Britain and Germany and attempts some evaluation of performance outcomes. Drawing on the insights of New Institutionalism in economics and sociology, it is shown that the higher degree of stability and consistency in systems of social regulation in Germany, as compared with Britain, leads to more predictable and consensual relations between firms. The resulting development of greater mutual trust encourages more long-term and closer technological collaboration. The paper utilizes data from a recent comparative study of supplier relations in two traditional industries and supplements them with information from more general studies of the technical regulation of interfirm relations. Copyright 1997 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lane, Christel, 1997. "The Social Regulation of Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Germany: Market Rules, Legal Norms and Technical Standards," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 21(2), pages 197-215, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:21:y:1997:i:2:p:197-215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evans Ana Maria, 2013. "Building institutional capacity: from pervasive individualism to sustained coordination in small firm sectors," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 163-186, August.
    2. Hemmert, Martin & Kim, DaeSoo & Kim, Jisun & Cho, BooYun, 2016. "Building the supplier's trust: Role of institutional forces and buyer firm practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 25-37.
    3. Dodd, Nigel, 2000. "Economic sociology in the UK," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 2(1), pages 3-12.
    4. Nausheen H. Anwar, 2010. "Institutional Actors, Learning and Agency," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 2(2), pages 153-171, December.
    5. Pam Manhart & James K. Summers & Jennifer Blackhurst, 2020. "A Meta‐Analytic Review of Supply Chain Risk Management: Assessing Buffering and Bridging Strategies and Firm Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(3), pages 66-87, July.
    6. Möllering, Guido, 2005. "Understanding Trust from the Perspective of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism: The Interplay of Institutions and Agency," MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    7. Iizuka, Michiko & Ikeda, Yoko, 2021. "Regulation and innovation under the 4th industrial revolution: The case of a healthcare robot, HAL by Cyberdyne," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:21:y:1997:i:2:p:197-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.