IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v106y2019i1p47-68..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for independence in arbitrary distributions

Author

Listed:
  • C Genest
  • J G Nešlehová
  • B Rémillard
  • O A Murphy

Abstract

SUMMARY Statistics are proposed for testing the hypothesis that arbitrary random variables are mutually independent. The tests are consistent and well behaved for any marginal distributions; they can be used, for example, for contingency tables which are sparse or whose dimension depends on the sample size, as well as for mixed data. No regularity conditions, data jittering, or binning mechanisms are required. The statistics are rank-based functionals of Cramér–von Mises type whose asymptotic behaviour derives from the empirical multilinear copula process. Approximate $p$-values are computed using a wild bootstrap. The procedures are simple to implement and computationally efficient, and maintain their level well in moderate to large samples. Simulations suggest that the tests are robust with respect to the number of ties in the data, can easily detect a broad range of alternatives, and outperform existing procedures in many settings. Additional insight into their performance is provided through asymptotic local power calculations under contiguous alternatives. The procedures are illustrated on traumatic brain injury data.

Suggested Citation

  • C Genest & J G Nešlehová & B Rémillard & O A Murphy, 2019. "Testing for independence in arbitrary distributions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 106(1), pages 47-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:106:y:2019:i:1:p:47-68.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asy059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deheuvels, Paul, 1981. "An asymptotic decomposition for multivariate distribution-free tests of independence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 102-113, March.
    2. Bücher, Axel & Dette, Holger, 2010. "A note on bootstrap approximations for the empirical copula process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(23-24), pages 1925-1932, December.
    3. Rémillard, Bruno & Scaillet, Olivier, 2009. "Testing for equality between two copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 377-386, March.
    4. Genest, Christian & Nešlehová, Johanna, 2007. "A Primer on Copulas for Count Data," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(2), pages 475-515, November.
    5. Meintanis, Simos G. & Iliopoulos, George, 2008. "Fourier methods for testing multivariate independence," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 1884-1895, January.
    6. Bakirov, Nail K. & Rizzo, Maria L. & Szekely, Gábor J., 2006. "A multivariate nonparametric test of independence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(8), pages 1742-1756, September.
    7. Ghoudi, Kilani & Kulperger, Reg J. & Rémillard, Bruno, 2001. "A Nonparametric Test of Serial Independence for Time Series and Residuals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 191-218, November.
    8. Genest, Christian & Quessy, Jean-François & Rémillard, Bruno, 2006. "Local efficiency of a Cramer-von Mises test of independence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 274-294, January.
    9. Genest, Christian & Nešlehová, Johanna G. & Rémillard, Bruno, 2017. "Asymptotic behavior of the empirical multilinear copula process under broad conditions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 82-110.
    10. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496.
    11. Genest, Christian & Nešlehová, Johanna G. & Rémillard, Bruno, 2013. "On the estimation of Spearman’s rho and related tests of independence for possibly discontinuous multivariate data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 214-228.
    12. Fan, Yanan & de Micheaux, Pierre Lafaye & Penev, Spiridon & Salopek, Donna, 2017. "Multivariate nonparametric test of independence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 189-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laverny, Oskar & Masiello, Esterina & Maume-Deschamps, Véronique & Rullière, Didier, 2021. "Dependence structure estimation using Copula Recursive Trees," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Mercadier, Cécile & Roustant, Olivier & Genest, Christian, 2022. "Linking the Hoeffding–Sobol and Möbius formulas through a decomposition of Kuo, Sloan, Wasilkowski, and Woźniakowski," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Marc Hallin & Simos Meintanis & Klaus Nordhausen, 2024. "Consistent Distribution–Free Affine–Invariant Tests for the Validity of Independent Component Models," Working Papers ECARES 2024-04, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Nasri, Bouchra R., 2022. "Tests of serial dependence for multivariate time series with arbitrary distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Fernández-Durán Juan José & Gregorio-Domínguez María Mercedes, 2023. "Test of bivariate independence based on angular probability integral transform with emphasis on circular-circular and circular-linear data," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Beaulieu Guillaume Boglioni & de Micheaux Pierre Lafaye & Ouimet Frédéric, 2021. "Counterexamples to the classical central limit theorem for triplewise independent random variables having a common arbitrary margin," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 424-438, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kojadinovic, Ivan & Stemikovskaya, Kristina, 2019. "Subsampling (weighted smooth) empirical copula processes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 704-723.
    2. Genest, Christian & Nešlehová, Johanna G. & Rémillard, Bruno, 2017. "Asymptotic behavior of the empirical multilinear copula process under broad conditions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 82-110.
    3. Bianchi, Pascal & Elgui, Kevin & Portier, François, 2023. "Conditional independence testing via weighted partial copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Berghaus, Betina & Segers, Johan, 2018. "Weak convergence of the weighted empirical beta copula process," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 266-281.
    5. Tarik Bahraoui & Nikolai Kolev, 2021. "New Measure of the Bivariate Asymmetry," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 421-448, February.
    6. Nasri, Bouchra R., 2022. "Tests of serial dependence for multivariate time series with arbitrary distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Fan, Yanan & de Micheaux, Pierre Lafaye & Penev, Spiridon & Salopek, Donna, 2017. "Multivariate nonparametric test of independence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 189-210.
    8. Kojadinovic, Ivan, 2017. "Some copula inference procedures adapted to the presence of ties," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 24-41.
    9. Genest, Christian & Nešlehová, Johanna G. & Rémillard, Bruno, 2013. "On the estimation of Spearman’s rho and related tests of independence for possibly discontinuous multivariate data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 214-228.
    10. Beare, Brendan K. & Seo, Juwon, 2020. "Randomization Tests Of Copula Symmetry," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(6), pages 1025-1063, December.
    11. Kiriliouk, Anna & Segers, Johan & Tsukahara, Hideatsu, 2019. "On Some Resampling Procedures with the Empirical Beta Copula," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019012, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. César Garcia-Gomez & Ana Pérez & Mercedes Prieto-Alaiz, 2022. "The evolution of poverty in the EU-28: a further look based on multivariate tail dependence," Working Papers 605, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    13. Bücher Axel, 2014. "A note on nonparametric estimation of bivariate tail dependence," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 31(2), pages 1-12, June.
    14. Miguel A. Delgado & Juan Carlos Escanciano, 2013. "Conditional Stochastic Dominance Testing," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 16-28, January.
    15. Christian Genest & Johanna Nešlehová, 2014. "On tests of radial symmetry for bivariate copulas," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1107-1119, November.
    16. Geenens Gery, 2020. "Copula modeling for discrete random vectors," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 417-440, January.
    17. Meintanis, Simos G. & Hušková, Marie & Hlávka, Zdeněk, 2022. "Fourier-type tests of mutual independence between functional time series," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Jean-David Fermanian, 2012. "An overview of the goodness-of-fit test problem for copulas," Papers 1211.4416, arXiv.org.
    19. Helmut Herwartz & Simone Maxand, 2020. "Nonparametric tests for independence: a review and comparative simulation study with an application to malnutrition data in India," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2175-2201, October.
    20. Rémillard, Bruno & Scaillet, Olivier, 2009. "Testing for equality between two copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 377-386, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:106:y:2019:i:1:p:47-68.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.