IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i2p494-500..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal condition determines offspring behavior toward family members in the European earwig

Author

Listed:
  • Jos Kramer
  • Joël Meunier

Abstract

Parental care confers benefits to juveniles but is usually associated with substantial costs for parents. These costs often depend on parental condition, which is thus considered as a key determinant of the level of parental care expressed during family life. However, how parental condition affects the behaviors that juveniles express toward their siblings and parents remains poorly explored. Here, we investigated these questions in the European earwig Forficula auricularia, an insect in which mothers provide extensive forms of care to their juveniles. We measured maternal body condition at egg hatching, subsequently manipulated maternal nutritional state, and finally assessed both food transfer among siblings and the nature of mother–offspring interactions. We also considered variation in brood size, an important parameter in family interactions. We found that food transfer among siblings increased with brood size when the tending mothers were in a deteriorated nutritional state. This effect was masked when the nutritional state of mothers was enhanced. The frequency of care-related behaviors that juveniles expressed toward their mother was higher when she was in a deteriorated rather than an enhanced nutritional state, while it overall increased with brood size. Finally, increasing values of maternal body condition entailed a shift from a positive to a negative association between maternal care behaviors and brood size, but only when the mothers’ nutritional state was deteriorated. Overall, our results demonstrate that parental condition and brood size do not only affect parental behaviors but can also be important and entangled drivers of offspring behaviors during family life.

Suggested Citation

  • Jos Kramer & Joël Meunier, 2016. "Maternal condition determines offspring behavior toward family members in the European earwig," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 494-500.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:494-500.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv181
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fox, John, 2003. "Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 8(i15).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea S. Grunst & Melissa L. Grunst, 2015. "Context-dependent relationships between multiple sexual pigments and paternal effort," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(4), pages 1170-1179.
    2. Christian Kleiber & Achim Zeileis, 2016. "Visualizing Count Data Regressions Using Rootograms," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 296-303, July.
    3. Jimena Sobrino-Piazza & Simon Foster & Natalia Estévez-Lamorte & Meichun Mohler-Kuo, 2021. "Parental Monitoring, Individual Dispositions, and Alcohol Use Disorder: A Longitudinal Study with Young Swiss Men," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Giovanni Cassani & Robert Grimm & Walter Daelemans & Steven Gillis, 2018. "Lexical category acquisition is facilitated by uncertainty in distributional co-occurrences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-36, December.
    5. repec:jss:jstsof:32:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Giuliano Guerra & Roberto Patuelli & Rico Maggi, 2012. "Ethnic concentration, cultural identity and immigrant self-employment in Switzerland," Chapters, in: Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot & Mediha Sahin (ed.), Migration Impact Assessment, chapter 4, pages 147-171, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Ekbrand, Hans & Halleröd, Björn, 2018. "The more gender equity, the less child poverty? A multilevel analysis of malnutrition and health deprivation in 49 low- and middle-income countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 221-230.
    8. Xu, JieLan, 2020. "Generational trends of gendered mobility: How do they interact with geographical contexts?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Kneib, Thomas & Silbersdorff, Alexander & Säfken, Benjamin, 2023. "Rage Against the Mean – A Review of Distributional Regression Approaches," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 99-123.
    10. Jonathan Kim & Ute Gabriel & Pascal Gygax, 2019. "Testing the effectiveness of the Internet-based instrument PsyToolkit: A comparison between web-based (PsyToolkit) and lab-based (E-Prime 3.0) measurements of response choice and response time in a co," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Aistė Balžekienė & Audronė Telešienė & Vaidas Morkevičius, 2022. "Spatial Dependencies and the Relationship between Subjective Perception and Objective Environmental Risks in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Pilhöfer, Alexander & Unwin, Antony, 2013. "New Approaches in Visualization of Categorical Data: R Package extracat," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 53(i07).
    13. Martin Meermeyer, 2014. "LinRegInteractive: An R Package for the Interactive Interpretation of Linear Regression Models," Schumpeter Discussion Papers SDP14014, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    14. Jamie C. Moore & Gabriele B. Durrant & Peter W. F. Smith, 2021. "Do coefficients of variation of response propensities approximate non‐response biases during survey data collection?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 301-323, January.
    15. More, Kimberly R. & Quigley-McBride, Adele & Clerke, Alexa S. & More, Curt, 2019. "Do measures of country-level safety predict individual-level health outcomes?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 128-138.
    16. Sasha K Whitmarsh & Dhara B Amin & John J Costi & Joshua D Dennis & Charlie Huveneers, 2019. "Effectiveness of novel fabrics to resist punctures and lacerations from white shark (Carcharodon carcharias): Implications to reduce injuries from shark bites," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    17. James G. Gimpel & Iris Hui, 2017. "Inadvertent and intentional partisan residential sorting," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(3), pages 441-468, May.
    18. Michail Papazoglou & Ioannis Galariotis, 2020. "Revisiting the Effect of Income on Health in Europe: Evidence from the 8th Round of the European Social Survey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 281-296, February.
    19. Fotache Marin & Hrubaru Ionuț, 2016. "Performance Analysis of Two Big Data Technologies on a Cloud Distributed Architecture. Results for Non-Aggregate Queries on Medium-Sized Data," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 63(s1), pages 21-50, December.
    20. Mishra, Gouri Shankar & Clewlow, Regina R. & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Widaman, Keith F., 2015. "The effect of carsharing on vehicle holdings and travel behavior: A propensity score and causal mediation analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 46-55.
    21. repec:jss:jstsof:14:i09 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Krafft, Manfred & Arden, Christine M. & Verhoef, Peter C., 2017. "Permission Marketing and Privacy Concerns — Why Do Customers (Not) Grant Permissions?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 39-54.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:494-500.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.