IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/journl/v4y2008p571-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Value of Ingredient Brand Equity at Multiple Stages in the Supply Chain: a Component Supplier's Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Waldemar Pfoertsch

    (CEIBS China Europe International Business School Shanghai,China and Pforzheim University, Germany)

  • Christian Linder

    (Faculty of Business and Law, Pforzheim University, Germany)

  • Jennifer D. Chandler

    (Department of Marketing, Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA)

Abstract

The goal of this article is to conceptualize the Ingredient Branding strategy and propose tools for measuring value derived from brand equity at the component supplier’s perspective. We demonstrate how brand equity occurs and how it can be measured at three marketing stages: B2B, B2C and B2B2C.This paper characterizes different stages in the Ingredient Branding strategy. Furthermore, the paper provides a different measurement method for each stage, and highlights in the end, an overall view of all participants in the Ingredient Branding value chain. We show fi rst that measuring brand equity at the end user stage alone is not as useful as measuring brand equity at multiple stages of the value chain. The complexity associated with an Ingredient Branding strategy makes it a multi-stage branding and marketing effort. Therefore, various data and measurement tools are needed to meet the needs of marketing managers and scholars focused on brand strategies for differing stages of the value chain. We demons rate that existing brand measurement methods can be modified to analyze multi-stage, interrelated exchanges. The paper extends existing brand measurements to capture the value of an Ingredient Brand both qualitatively and quantitatively, at multiple stages of the value chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Waldemar Pfoertsch & Christian Linder & Jennifer D. Chandler, 2008. "Measuring the Value of Ingredient Brand Equity at Multiple Stages in the Supply Chain: a Component Supplier's Perspective," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 4, pages 571-595, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:4:y:2008:p:571-595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.hr/repec/osi/journl/PDF/InterdisciplinaryManagementResearchIV/IMR4a34.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prince, Melvin & Davies, Mark, 2002. "Co-branding partners: What do they see in each other?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 51-55.
    2. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. "Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    3. Philip Kotler & Waldemar Pfoertsch, 2006. "B2B Brand Management," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-44729-0, December.
    4. R. Venkatesh & Vijay Mahajan, 1997. "Products with Branded Components: An Approach for Premium Pricing and Partner Selection," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 146-165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anca BUTNARIU, 2017. "Ingredient Branding - A Growth Opportunity?," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 13, pages 101-107, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai-Lung Hui, 2004. "Product Variety Under Brand Influence: An Empirical Investigation of Personal Computer Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 686-700, May.
    2. Ralf van der Lans & Bram Van den Bergh & Evelien Dieleman, 2014. "Partner Selection in Brand Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Drivers of Brand Fit," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 551-566, July.
    3. Li, Yan & He, Hongwei, 2013. "Evaluation of international brand alliances: Brand order and consumer ethnocentrism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 89-97.
    4. Kalafatis, Stavros P. & Ledden, Lesley & Riley, Debra & Singh, Jaywant, 2016. "The added value of brand alliances in higher education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3122-3132.
    5. Koschmann, Anthony & Bowman, Douglas, 2018. "Evaluating marketplace synergies of ingredient brand alliances," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 575-590.
    6. Zixia Cao & Alina Sorescu, 2013. "Wedded Bliss or Tainted Love? Stock Market Reactions to the Introduction of Cobranded Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 939-959, November.
    7. Un-Kon Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Confirmation of Nation Brand Image in International Tourism Advertisement on Travel Intention of Foreign Tourists: The Case of Korean ITA for Chinese Tourists," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    8. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "The Effective Type of Information Categorization in Online Curation Service Depending on Psychological Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Niklas Bondesson, 2012. "Brand Image Antecedents of Loyalty and Price Premium in Business Markets," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 32-47, March.
    10. Sandra J. Milberg, 2001. "Positive Feedback Effects Of Brand Extensions: Expanding Brand Meaning And The Range Of Extendibility," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(1), pages 3-35.
    11. Dimitriu, Radu & Warlop, Luk, 2022. "Is similarity a constraint for service-to-service brand extensions?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1019-1041.
    12. Das, Gopal, 2014. "Factors affecting Indian shoppers׳ attitude and purchase intention: An empirical check," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 561-569.
    13. Takumi Kato, 2021. "Brand loyalty explained by concept recall: recognizing the significance of the brand concept compared to features," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(3), pages 185-198, September.
    14. Homburg, Christian & Klarmann, Martin & Schmitt, Jens, 2010. "Brand awareness in business markets: When is it related to firm performance?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 201-212.
    15. Glynn, Mark S., 2012. "Primer in B2B brand-building strategies with a reader practicum," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 666-675.
    16. Rasoul Azadi & BAHRAM YOUSEFI & HOSSEIN EYDI, 2016. "The Impact of the sponsorship in the Sport in promoting brand equity of sportswear industry," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 19-32, May.
    17. Jungju Yu, 2021. "A Model of Brand Architecture Choice: A House of Brands vs. A Branded House," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 147-167, January.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2386 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. László Kovács, 2019. "Insights from Brand Associations: Alcohol Brands and Automotive Brands in the Mind of the Consumer," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 31(1), pages 97-121.
    20. Özge Sýðýrcý & A. Müge Yalçýn, 2010. "Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations Of Brand Extensions," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 67-90.
    21. Jeffrey R. Parker & Donald R. Lehmann & Kevin Lane Keller & Martin G. Schleicher, 2018. "Building a multi-category brand: when should distant brand extensions be introduced?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 300-316, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ingredient Branding; brand measurement; value chain.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics
    • L9 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities
    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:4:y:2008:p:571-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hrvoje Serdarusic, PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.