IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2020i2p147-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Contemporary Approach Of Taxation, From The Point Of View Of Its Historical Evolution. Theoretical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • CRISTEA Loredana Andreea

    (Department of Doctoral Studies, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania)

  • VODĂ Alina Daniela

    (Department of Doctoral Studies, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania)

  • UNGUREANU Dragoş Mihai

    (Faculty of Finance and Banking, Spiru Haret University of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The topic of this research focuses on the study of the taxation process, which is one of the oldest activities in human history and has played a key role in civilized societies for thousands of years, developing its roots with the emergence of the state and trade relations between people. The research methodology is mainly based on the method of theoretical research and the method of reading the literature, being mainly a qualitative research, designed to provide a generous substrate in addressing the process of taxation in economic life. Thus, this theoretical research aims to briefly cover the most important historical stages of taxation in order to provide a comprehensive definition of the concept of tax. The tax system, through compulsory levies, plays a complex role in any state, being one of the pillars of influencing the economy. The government plays an important role in the economic growth and development of emerging countries, as it provides indispensable public services, so we believe that the approach of taxation as a clear proof of fiscal civilization can provide significant theoretical resources for the literature. Given that tax levies are the basic components of tax revenues and are means and levers of budget revenue formation, this research aims to address them conceptually, so that the main purpose of this paper to be achieve. This article concluded that over time, the concepts of taxation have evolved and been transmitted to other cultures, where, later, fiscal ideas took root. This model continues to this day, as nations are influenced by the evolution of taxes in other countries, which are perceived in order to cover the financing needs of the state, in order to achieve the primary objective, namely economic stability. The value of the obtained results can be quantified by broadening the spectrum of theoretical research, providing an additional knowledge, significantly in the fiscal literature.

Suggested Citation

  • CRISTEA Loredana Andreea & VODĂ Alina Daniela & UNGUREANU Dragoş Mihai, 2020. "The Contemporary Approach Of Taxation, From The Point Of View Of Its Historical Evolution. Theoretical Framework," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 147-156, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:147-156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2020/n2/013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Stephen, 2015. "Taxation: A Very Short Introduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199683697.
    2. Salanié, Bernard, 2011. "The Economics of Taxation," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262016346, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blumkin, Tomer & Sadka, Efraim & Shem-Tov, Yotam, 2011. "Labor Migration and the Case for Flat Tax," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275759, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Sergio Turner, 2004. "Pareto Improving Taxation in Incomplete Markets," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 310, Econometric Society.
    3. Massimo Morelli & Huanxing Yang & Lixin Ye, 2012. "Competitive Nonlinear Taxation and Constitutional Choice," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(1), pages 142-175, February.
    4. Laurence Jacquet & Etienne lehmann & Bruno Van Der Linden, 2012. "Signing distortions in optimal tax or other adverse selection models with random participation," THEMA Working Papers 2012-27, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    5. Xiaobing Wang & Jenifer Piesse, 2009. "Welfare Effects of Regressive Taxation and Subsidies in China," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 10809, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    6. N. Gregory Mankiw & Matthew Weinzierl & Danny Yagan, 2009. "Optimal Taxation in Theory and Practice," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(4), pages 147-174, Fall.
    7. Blumkin, Tomer & Ruffle, Bradley J. & Ganun, Yosef, 2012. "Are income and consumption taxes ever really equivalent? Evidence from a real-effort experiment with real goods," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1200-1219.
    8. Cruz-Martinez, Gibran, 2021. "Universal Social Pensions Are Unaffordable … Not! Testing the Unaffordability Hypothesis in Latin America and the Caribbean," SocArXiv ne9rw, Center for Open Science.
    9. Simon Loertscher & Andras Niedermayer, 2012. "Fee-Setting Mechanisms: On Optimal Pricing by Intermediaries and Indirect Taxation," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1162, The University of Melbourne.
    10. Armenter, Roc & Mertens, Thomas M., 2013. "Fraud deterrence in dynamic Mirrleesian economies," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 139-151.
    11. Sheshinski, Eytan, 2007. "Optimum commodity taxation in pooling equilibria," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(7-8), pages 1565-1573, August.
    12. Laurence Jacquet & Etienne Lehmann, 2021. "Optimal Income Taxation with Composition Effects," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1299-1341.
    13. Loredana Andreea Cristea & Alina Daniela Vodă & Dragoș Mihai Ungureanu, 2020. "The Characterization of the Taxation Process in Terms of Tax Culture, as an Element of Novelty," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 863-870, December.
    14. Hisahiro Naito & Yu Takagi, 2017. "Is racial salary discrimination disappearing in the NBA? evidence from data during 1985–2015," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 651-669, September.
    15. Thomas Koch & Javier Birchenall, 2016. "Taking versus taxing: an analysis of conscription in a private information economy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 177-199, June.
    16. Masaya Yasuoka & Minoru Hayashida, 2015. "How should a government finance redistribution policies?," Discussion Paper Series 136, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Oct 2015.
    17. Ali Enami & Ugo Gentilini & Patricio Larroulet & Nora Lustig & Emma Monsalve & Siyu Quan & Jamele Rigolini, 2023. "Universal Basic Income Programs: How Much Would Taxes Need to Rise? Evidence for Brazil, Chile, India, Russia, and South Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(9), pages 1443-1463, September.
    18. Sergio Turner, 2004. "Pareto Improving Taxation in Incomplete Markets," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 614, Econometric Society.
    19. Dominik Sachs & Aleh Tsyvinski & Nicolas Werquin, 2020. "Nonlinear Tax Incidence and Optimal Taxation in General Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 469-493, March.
    20. Zhuan Pei, 2017. "Eligibility Recertification and Dynamic Opt-In Incentives in Income-Tested Social Programs: Evidence from Medicaid/CHIP," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 241-276, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    historical evolution; taxation; tax system; fiscality; theoretical approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E61 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:147-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.