IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbmp/y2020iq1-q2-20b6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auswirkungen der EU-Mitgliedschaft auf ausländische Greenfield-Direktinvestitionen

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Christen

    (WIFO)

  • Martin Falk

    (WIFO)

Abstract

Empirische Studien zeigen, dass die EU-Mitgliedschaft und die Schaffung des Europäischen Binnenmarktes 1992 zu einer höheren Direktinvestitionstätigkeit führten. Theoretisch ist es möglich, dass die Auswirkungen der wirtschaftlichen Integration auf die ausländischen Direktinvestitionen (foreign direct investment, FDI) mit zunehmender Zahl an EU-Mitgliedstaaten im Lauf der Zeit nachlassen. In dieser Arbeit werden die Auswirkungen des EU-Beitritts auf die Greenfield-Direktinvestitionen untersucht. Dabei wird nach Sektoren (Dienstleistungen und Sachgütererzeugung) unterschieden, und es werden die unterschiedlichen Herkunftsländer berücksichtigt. Die Auswirkungen werden anhand eines FDI-Gravitationsmodells geschätzt, das Informationen über 200.000 Direktinvestitionsprojekte im Zeitraum von 2003 bis 2018 enthält. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Auswirkungen der EU-Mitgliedschaft auf die Greenfield-Direktinvestitionen für Bulgarien und Rumänien groß und signifikant sind, jedoch nicht signifikant für Kroatien. Die Anzahl der angekündigten Greenfield-Direktinvestitionsprojekte österreichischer multinationaler Unternehmen in Bulgarien und Rumänien stieg in den ersten drei Jahren nach dem Beitritt um durchschnittlich 180 %, die Zahl der dadurch geschaffenen Arbeitsplätze um 140 %. Die größten Effekte waren bereits im Jahr vor dem Beitritt zu beobachten gewesen. Investitionen aus den Nicht-EU-Ländern sind nach dem EU-Beitritt weniger stark angestiegen. Die Ergebnisse unterscheiden sich nicht wesentlich für den Dienstleistungssektor und die Sachgütererzeugung.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Christen & Martin Falk, 2020. "Auswirkungen der EU-Mitgliedschaft auf ausländische Greenfield-Direktinvestitionen," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q1-Q2/20, pages 110-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbmp:y:2020:i:q1-q2/20:b:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:98d8f5a0-355c-4932-a49b-395e7e413401/09_MOP_Q1_2_20_Auswirkungen-der-EU-Mitgliedschaft.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guntram Wolff, 2007. "Foreign Direct Investment in the Enlarged EU: Do Taxes Matter and to What Extent?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 327-346, July.
    2. Bruce A. Blonigen & Jeremy Piger, 2019. "Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Foreign Direct Investment, chapter 1, pages 3-54, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Baltagi, Badi H. & Egger, Peter & Pfaffermayr, Michael, 2008. "Estimating regional trade agreement effects on FDI in an interdependent world," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1-2), pages 194-208, July.
    4. Eugene D. Hahn & Kraiwinee Bunyaratavej & Jonathan P. Doh, 2011. "Impacts of Risk and Service Type on Nearshore and Offshore Investment Location Decisions," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 357-380, June.
    5. Santos Silva, J.M.C. & Tenreyro, Silvana, 2011. "Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 220-222, August.
    6. Paul Brenton & Francesca Di Mauro & Matthias Lücke, 2014. "Economic Integration and FDI: An Empirical Analysis off Foreign Investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: INTERNATIONAL TRADE, DISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT Empirical Studies of Trade Policies, chapter 7, pages 125-151, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Jean-François Hennart & Arjen Slangen & Roger Smeets, 2010. "Why and how FDI stocks are a biased measure of MNE affiliate activity," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(9), pages 1444-1459, December.
    8. Avik Chakrabarti, 2001. "The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investments: Sensitivity Analyses of Cross‐Country Regressions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 89-114, February.
    9. Bas Straathof & Gert Jan Linders & Arjan Lejour & Jan Möhlmann, 2008. "The internal market and the Dutch economy: implications for trade and economic growth," CPB Document 168.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    10. Bas Straathof & Gert Jan Linders & Arjan Lejour & Jan Möhlmann, 2008. "The internal market and the Dutch economy: implications for trade and economic growth," CPB Document 168, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    11. Zwinkels, Remco C.J. & Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd, 2010. "Gravity equations: Workhorse or Trojan horse in explaining trade and FDI patterns across time and space?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 102-115, February.
    12. Miao Wang & M. C. Sunny Wong, 2009. "What Drives Economic Growth? The Case of Cross‐Border M&A and Greenfield FDI Activities," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 316-330, April.
    13. Bevan, Alan A. & Estrin, Saul, 2004. "The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 775-787, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Falk, 2012. "Determinants of Greenfield Investment in Knowledge Intensive Business Services," FIW Research Reports series IV-002, FIW.
    2. repec:wsr:ecbook:2010:i:iv-002 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Martin Falk, 2013. "New Empirical Findings for International Investment in Intangible Assets. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 30," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46891, April.
    4. Martin Falk, 2016. "Austria 2025 – Corporate Investment in Austria. Stylised Facts, Impacts, Determinants and Investment Policies," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59183, February.
    5. Randolph Luca Bruno & Nauro Ferreira Campos & Saul Estrin, 2021. "The Effect on Foreign Direct Investment of Membership in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 802-821, July.
    6. Falk, Martin, 2016. "A gravity model of foreign direct investment in the hospitality industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 225-237.
    7. Mariam Camarero & Laura Montolio & Cecilio Tamarit, 2022. "Explaining German outward FDI in the EU: a reassessment using Bayesian model averaging and GLM estimators," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 487-511, February.
    8. Mariam Camarero & Sergi Moliner & Cecilio Tamarit, 2021. "Is there a euro effect in the drivers of US FDI? New evidence using Bayesian model averaging techniques," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 157(4), pages 881-926, November.
    9. Ray Barrell & Abdulkader Nahhas, 2022. "Regional integration and bilateral FDI stocks in the OECD," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3032-3050, July.
    10. Paul J. J. Welfens & Fabian J. Baier, 2018. "BREXIT and Foreign Direct Investment: Key Issues and New Empirical Findings," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Sirin, Selahattin Murat, 2017. "Foreign direct investments (FDIs) in Turkish power sector: A discussion on investments, opportunities and risks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1367-1377.
    12. Bassem Kahouli & Anis Omri & Anissa Chaibi, 2014. "Environmental Regulations, Trade, and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Gravity Equations," Working Papers 2014-189, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    13. Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2018. "Determinants of capital flows to emerging economies - Evidence from Vietnam," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 23-27.
    14. Kahouli, Bassem & Omri, Anis, 2017. "Foreign direct investment, foreign trade and environment: New evidence from simultaneous-equation system of gravity models," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 353-364.
    15. Kahouli, Bassem & Maktouf, Samir, 2015. "The determinants of FDI and the impact of the economic crisis on the implementation of RTAs: A static and dynamic gravity model," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 518-529.
    16. Mariam Camarero & Laura Montolio & Cecilio Tamarit, 2019. "Alternative Estimators For The Fdi Gravity Model: An Application To German Outward Fdi," Working Papers 1907, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    17. Mariam Camarero & Laura Montolio & Cecilio Tamarit, 2020. "Understanding German FDI in Latin America and Asia: A Comparison of GLM Estimators," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Tobias Zander, 2020. "Does corruption matter for FDI flows in the OECD? A gravity analysis," EIIW Discussion paper disbei280, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    19. Julia Bahlmann & Paul J.J. Welfens, 2021. "Environmental Policy Stringency and Foreign Direct Investment: New Insights from a Gravity Model Approach," EIIW Discussion paper disbei294, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    20. Saime Kayam & Alexandr Yabrukov & Mehtap Hisarciklilar, 2013. "What Causes the Regional Disparity of FDI in Russia? A Spatial Analysis," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 20(1), pages 63-78, April.
    21. Manfred M. Fischer & Nico Pintar & Benedikt Sargant, 2016. "Austrian Outbound Foreign Direct Investment in Europe:A spatial econometric study," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, JUNE.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Greenfield FDI; EU accession; gravity model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbmp:y:2020:i:q1-q2/20:b:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rita Glaser-Schwarz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.