IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2014i3p15-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models and Tools for Technology Start-Up Companies Success Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kaloyan Haralampiev
  • Boyan Yankov
  • Petko Ruskov

Abstract

The designs presented in the article are fastened in the authors’ years-long research on entrepreneurship and business model innovations. A quantitative research was performed to derive a model for predicting the success of Bulgarian startup companies. The authors started this research with in-depth inquiries of start-up companies in Bulgaria. Under our guidance, several research analysts investigated each start-up using approximately 100 questions. The preceding research stages included an overview and an analysis of existing success prediction models, a new abstract success prediction model, a venture creation process model and a qualitative research. The abstract success prediction model was extended with measurable variables with the help of a quantitative research of Bulgarian entrepreneurs. The current dataset of companies has been enriched with more cases and has been analyzed using data mining software: IBM SPSS Modeler, which automatically tests different models and suggests the best performing ones and also with the open source product Weka. The best derived model is a classification tree that correctly predicts the success of technology start-ups from the dataset in 83,76% of the test cases. The analysis revealed the answers to challenges and questions that start-up companies face and implemented a model that was deployed into an information system for start-ups success prediction. The developed information system will help to predict the success of start-ups. The software will evolve iteratively, and by involving more companies to use it, will grow its database.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaloyan Haralampiev & Boyan Yankov & Petko Ruskov, 2014. "Models and Tools for Technology Start-Up Companies Success Analysis," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 15-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2014:i:3:p:15-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unwe.bg/uploads/Alternatives/2_broi_3_2014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Chrisman & Alan Bauerschmidt & Charles W. Hofer, 1998. "The Determinants of New Venture Performance: An Extended Model," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(1), pages 5-29, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Falco J. Bargagli-Stoffi & Jan Niederreiter & Massimo Riccaboni, 2020. "Supervised learning for the prediction of firm dynamics," Papers 2009.06413, arXiv.org.
    2. Dafei Yin & Jing Li & Gaosheng Wu, 2021. "Solving the Data Sparsity Problem in Predicting the Success of the Startups with Machine Learning Methods," Papers 2112.07985, arXiv.org.
    3. Macalik Joanna, 2023. "Personal Brand — Instructions of Use. Do Young Professionals Want and Need to be Taught Personal Branding?," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 28(2), pages 41-60, June.
    4. Stanley Ibeku, 2018. "Organisational Learning, Innovation And Performance Of Technology Start-Ups In Lagos, Nigeria," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bat Batjargal, 2000. "Entrepreneurial Versatility, Resources and Firm Performance in Russia: A Panel Study," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 351, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    2. Xuelin Chen & Dongmei Zhou & Ziying Zhan & Ruoyu Lu, 2023. "When Do You Enter? Entrepreneurial Firms’ Entry Timing and Product Performance in the Digital Platform Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Danny Soetanto & Sarah L. Jack, 2018. "Slack resources, exploratory and exploitative innovation and the performance of small technology-based firms at incubators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1213-1231, October.
    4. Marco van Gelderen & Marco van Gelderen & Niels Bosma & Niels Bosma & Roy Thurik & Roy Thurik, 2001. "Setting up a business in the Netherlands," Scales Research Reports H200013, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    5. Lin Song & Li Jing, 0. "Strategic orientation and performance of new ventures: empirical studies based on entrepreneurial activities in China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    6. Hongbum Kim & Yuri Jo & Daeho Lee, 2021. "R&D, Marketing, Strategic Planning, or Human Resources? Which CEO Career Is Most Helpful for the Economic Sustainability of ICT Startups in South Korea?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    7. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Franz Kellermanns, 2009. "Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(3), pages 739-760, May.
    8. Khelil, Nabil, 2016. "The many faces of entrepreneurial failure: Insights from an empirical taxonomy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 72-94.
    9. Daniel Blaseg & Christian Schulze & Bernd Skiera, 2020. "Consumer Protection on Kickstarter," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 211-233, January.
    10. Thomas Neumann, 2021. "The impact of entrepreneurship on economic, social and environmental welfare and its determinants: a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 553-584, July.
    11. Feng Guo & Bo Zou & Jinyu Guo & Yan Shi & Qingwen Bo & Liangxing Shi, 2019. "What determines academic entrepreneurship success? A social identity perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 929-952, September.
    12. Lin Song & Li Jing, 2017. "Strategic orientation and performance of new ventures: empirical studies based on entrepreneurial activities in China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 989-1012, December.
    13. Muhammad Anwar & Sher Zaman Khan & Najib Ullah Khan, 2018. "Intellectual Capital, Entrepreneurial Strategy and New Ventures Performance: Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(1), pages 63-94, March.
    14. Jana Drechsler & Jan-Thomas Bachmann & Andreas Engelen, 2019. "The effect of immigrants in the founding team on the international attention of new ventures," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 305-333, September.
    15. Seo, Joo Hwan & Perry, Vanessa G. & Tomczyk, David & Solomon, George T., 2014. "Who benefits most? The effects of managerial assistance on high- versus low-performing small businesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2845-2852.
    16. Jueping-Xie, 2021. "Marketization Of Research Achievements Of Universities And The Startups Of Female Scholars In Coastal China," Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 73-76, October.
    17. Thornhill, Stewart, 2006. "Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 687-703, September.
    18. Malte Brettel & Andreas Engelen & Florian Heinemann, 2009. "New entrepreneurial ventures in a globalized world: The role of market orientation," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 88-110, June.
    19. James J. Chrisman & Hanqing C. Fang & Lloyd Steier, 2023. "Positioning, Articulating, and Crafting Conceptual Articles on Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 211-231, March.
    20. Fehmi Tanrısever & S. Sinan Erzurumlu & Nitin Joglekar, 2012. "Production, Process Investment, and the Survival of Debt‐Financed Startup Firms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 637-652, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    technology start-ups; success prediction; prediction tool; start-ups analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2014:i:3:p:15-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.