IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ddldem/50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of methods for assessing the economic effect of using a complex impulse technologies and equipment for aggregate assembly structure of the aircraft

Author

Listed:
  • Vorobiov Iuriy

    (National Aerospace University «Kharkiv Aviation Institute»)

  • Maiorova Kateryna

    (National Aerospace University «Kharkiv Aviation Institute»)

Abstract

The object of the study is the economic effect of using a set of pulse technologies and equipment for unit assembly of aircraft structures with fixed mechanical connections. One of the main selected factors that ensure the economic effect is to improve the quality, static strength and durability of the structure, reducing the weight of the aircraft structure. The analysis of modern methods and approaches of definition of economic indicators of new technics and technologies products introduction at the enterprise which help to predict the general economic effect is carried out. The comparative efficiency of the introduced technology is used in relation to the basic one, which is used at the enterprises of the branch. The components of the economic effect from the application of a pulse technologies and equipment set are determined and the approach to the economic effect calculations from the creation and improvement of pneumatic manual pulse device (PMPD) in computer-aided design (CAD) systems is formed. In the course of the research methods for estimating the economic effect at introduction of new constructive and technological decisions of aircraft design and at application of a pulse technologies and equipment set, and also at application of PMPD CAD are offered. In comparison with similar known methods, the proposed approaches can minimize the time spent on calculations and increase the accuracy of their intended purpose. It provides an opportunity to demonstrate qualitatively the feasibility of using a pulse technologies and equipment set for unit assembly of aircraft structures with non-removable mechanical connections. Here are some ways to evaluate the effectiveness of using a decision support system (DSS). DSS contains methods, models and algorithms for decision-making, software, databases and knowledge of the subject area and recommendations for the practical use of the results of the source information analysis. The factors influencing the economic result of the use of DSS in production are shown in the form of a scheme, where for the economic life of the investment in the creation of DSS 6 years commonly-accepted for CAD were selected.

Suggested Citation

  • Vorobiov Iuriy & Maiorova Kateryna, 2020. "Development of methods for assessing the economic effect of using a complex impulse technologies and equipment for aggregate assembly structure of the aircraft," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 5(4(55)), pages 13-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/215691
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cabral, Luis M. B., 2000. "Introduction to Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262032864, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hernán Vallejo, 2007. "A generalized index of market power," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, December.
    2. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2003. "Multiproduct Quality Competition: Fighting Brands and Product Line Pruning," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 748-774, June.
    3. Valentiny, Pál, 2019. "Közgazdaságtan a jogalkalmazásban [Forensic economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 134-162.
    4. Ya-Chin Wang, 2013. "Optimal R&D Policy and Managerial Delegation Under Vertically Differentiated Duopoly," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 81(4), pages 605-624, December.
    5. Johan Eyckmans & Cathrine Hagem, 2009. "The European Union's Potential for Strategic Emissions Trading through Minimal Permit Sale Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 2809, CESifo.
    6. Fernandez, Jose & Nahata, Babu, 2009. "Pay What You Like," MPRA Paper 16265, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Barigozzi, Francesca & Ma, Ching-to Albert, 2018. "Product differentiation with multiple qualities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 380-412.
    8. DongJoon Lee & Seonyoung Lim & Kangsik Choi, 2017. "Port privatization under Cournot vs. Bertrand competition: a third-market approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 761-778, August.
    9. Michael Polemis & Konstantinos Eleftheriou, 2018. "To Regulate Or To Deregulate? The Role Of Downstream Competition In Upstream Monopoly Vertically Linked Markets," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 51-63, January.
    10. Enrico Tanuwidjaja, 2006. "Multi Factor SUR in Event Study Analysis : Evidence from M&A in Singapore’s Financial Industry," Finance Working Papers 22577, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    11. Raffaele Conti & Alfonso Gambardella & Myriam Mariani, 2014. "Learning to Be Edison: Inventors, Organizations, and Breakthrough Inventions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 833-849, June.
    12. Ming Hu & Joseph Milner & Jiahua Wu, 2016. "Liking and Following and the Newsvendor: Operations and Marketing Policies Under Social Influence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 867-879, March.
    13. Eshien Chong & Freddy Huet, 2006. "Enchères, concurrence par comparaison et collusion," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(3), pages 583-592.
    14. Emilie, Dargaud, 2010. "Mergers, cartels and leniency programs: The role of capital stocks," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 45-57, March.
    15. Eshien Chong & Freddy Huet, 2009. "Yardstick Competition, Franchise Bidding and Firms’ Incentives to Collude," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 35(1), pages 149-169, September.
    16. Matsumura, Toshihiro & Matsushima, Noriaki & Cato, Susumu, 2013. "Competitiveness and R&D competition revisited," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 541-547.
    17. Ikuo Ishibashi & Noriaki Matsushima, 2009. "The Existence of Low-End Firms May Help High-End Firms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 136-147, 01-02.
    18. Viktoria Kocsis & Victoria Shestalova & Henry van der Wiel & Nick Zubanov & Ruslan Lukach & Bert Minne, 2009. "Relation entry, exit and productivity: an overview of recent theoretical and empirical literature," CPB Document 180, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    19. Kristof Van Assche & Johannes Van Biesebroeck & Jeff Holm, 2014. "Governing the ice. Ice fishing villages on Lake Mille Lacs and the creation of environmental governance institutions," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(8), pages 1122-1144, August.
    20. Erika López Pontón, 2008. "Un criterio de eficiencia para la concepción y evaluación de las políticas públicas," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 10(18), pages 149-178, January-J.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic effect; complex of pulse technologies and equipment; aggregate assembly of aircraft;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • P47 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Performance and Prospects
    • R49 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.