IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jqat1f/doi10.1427-33903y2011i1p37-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economists' Views about the Economy. Evidence from a Survey of Italian Economists

Author

Listed:
  • Luca De Benedictis
  • Michele Di Maio

Abstract

This paper is about economists and their opinions on economic policies. Using a representative sample of Italian economists as a case study, we show that disagreement is large on both the causes of the economic difficulties in Italy and the economic policies to be implemented for a recovery. Searching for the sources of this disagreement, we regress individual opinions concerning economic Policy proposals on a large set of covariates: (1) the respondent's socio-demographic characteristics; (2) her level of expertise and research interest in the Italian economy; (3) her judgment on which are the causes of the economic difficulties of Italy; (4) the research field and school of thought of the respondent; and (5) her political opinions, pro-market orientation and degree of optimism. While the first two groups of covariates are not systematically correlated with individual opinions on economic Policy proposals, the last three are indeed. In particular, the political view, the degree of pro-market orientation and the level of optimism are all relevant in explaining differences in economists' opinions on economic Policy proposals characterized by low consensus among economists. On the contrary, for Policy proposals showing high consensus, the political view and the degree of optimism loose significance and the ultimate variable associated to the disagreement among economists is their level of pro-market orientation. The different opinion on which mechanism (Market vs State) should organize the economic system turns out to be the most profound source of differentiation among economists.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca De Benedictis & Michele Di Maio, 2011. "Economists' Views about the Economy. Evidence from a Survey of Italian Economists," Rivista italiana degli economisti, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 37-84.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jqat1f:doi:10.1427/33903:y:2011:i:1:p:37-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1427/33903
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1427/33903
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Mosler & Niklas Potrafke & Markus Reischmann, 2019. "How to Handle the Fiscal Crisis in Greece: Empirical Evidence Based on a Survey of Economic Experts," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 375-399, September.
    2. Jorge L. Andere & Jorge Luis Canché-Escamilla & à lvaro Cano-Escalante, 2020. "Consensus and Dissension among Economic Science Academics in Mexico," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-23, December.
    3. O’Neill, Donal, 2015. "Divided opinion on the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013: Random or systematic differences?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 175-178.
    4. Niclas Berggren & Henrik Jordahl & Charlotta Stern, 2009. "The Political Opinions of Swedish Social Scientists," Finnish Economic Papers, Finnish Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 75-88, Autumn.
    5. Verónica Amarante & Marisa Bucheli & Tatiana Pérez & Verónica Amarante, 2022. "Gender differences in opinions about market solutions and government interventions: the case of Uruguayan economists," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 22-01, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    6. Christoph Schinke, 2016. "Wealth and Politics: Studies on Inter Vivos Transfers and Partisan Effects," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 67.
    7. Ha Quyen Ngo & Niklas Potrafke & Marina Riem & Christoph Schinke, 2018. "Ideology and Dissent among Economists: The Joint Economic Forecast of German Economic Research Institutes," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(1), pages 135-152, January.
    8. Leiser, David & Benita, Rinat & Bourgeois-Gironde, Sacha, 2016. "Differing conceptions of the causes of the economic crisis: Effects of culture, economic training, and personal impact," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 154-163.
    9. Leonardo Becchetti & Berkan Acar, 2021. "Public Opinion Views on Immigrants’ Contribution to the Local Economy: the Role of TV Exposure," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 7(3), pages 509-532, November.
    10. Francesco Testa & Natalia Marzia Gusmerottia & Filippo Corsini & Emilio Passetti & Fabio Iraldo, 2016. "Factors Affecting Environmental Management by Small and Micro Firms: The Importance of Entrepreneurs’ Attitudes and Environmental Investment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 373-385, November.
    11. Marina Riem, 2017. "Essays on the Behavior of Firms and Politicians," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 73.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Italian economists; Italian economy; economic decline; consensus analysis; survey analysis; A11; A13; C42.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jqat1f:doi:10.1427/33903:y:2011:i:1:p:37-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.