IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lrc/larjob/v1y2016i1p41-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Vicarious” Liability of the Employer in Sexual Harassment Cases: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Dr DM Smit

    (DM Smit, B Iur, LLB, LLM (cum laude), LLD, lecturer, Department of Mercantile Law and Centre for Labour Law, University of the Free State.)

  • DJ Viviers

    (D Viviers, LLB (cum laude), LLM (Cum Laude) Department of Mercantile Law, University of the Free State.)

Abstract

In recent years, sexual harassment in the workplace has drastically increased worldwide, including in South Africa. Consequently, the country’s courts have looked to protect employees by attaching obligations to employers that could render them liable when their employees are sexually harassed in the workplace. The Employment Equity Act and the Code of Good Practice on the Handling of Sexual Harassment Cases in the Workplace have also introduced measures in terms of which an employer may be held liable once certain requirements have been met. However, when compared to other jurisdictions such as the United States of America, Australia and Ontario, Canada, where the legal position on sexual harassment in the workplace and employers’ vicarious liability seems clear-cut and effective, the South African measures seem to lack teeth. Various loopholes, poor awareness and training as well as lacking implementation mean that employees who are sexually harassed in employment may find themselves unprotected and unable to hold their employer vicariously liable. In an attempt to contribute to the development of South African law in this regard, this article firstly provides an overview of the current position in South Africa, followed by a comparative overview of the law in the USA, Australia and Ontario, Canada. It is concluded that South Africa stands to learn valuable lessons from these jurisdictions’ approach to sexual harassment in employment. The most significant of these include the proposed establishment of a body similar to the USA’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the Australian Human Rights Commission, which can be tasked specifically to deal with employment issues, including protecting employees against harassment, and enforcing and raising awareness about employer liability; making the drafting of internal policies on sexual harassment in employment compulsory and subject to inspection, and instituting compulsory training for managers to prevent and deal with sexual harassment in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr DM Smit & DJ Viviers, 2016. "“Vicarious” Liability of the Employer in Sexual Harassment Cases: A Comparative Study," Journal of Business, LAR Center Press, vol. 1(1), pages 41-59, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:lrc:larjob:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:41-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journalofbusiness.us/index.php/site/article/view/13/2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sexual harassment; vicarious liability; damages; delict; workplace; labour law.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J38 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Public Policy
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing
    • J78 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Public Policy (including comparable worth)
    • M51 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrc:larjob:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:41-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R Martin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journalofbusiness.us .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.