IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/scajes/v6y2020i1p121-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Reporting for Public Sector in EU. A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana Dorin
  • Ioan Rosca
  • Dana Andreea Costea
  • Cornel Suciu

Abstract

Sustainability reporting encompasses corporate reporting beyond traditional financial reporting into broader features of corporate performance and effect, including environmental, social and economic topics, and some durable outlooks. This paper studies the state of the art at a certain momentum for integrated reporting for public sector, with focus on the latest reports from five city-capitals from European Union. We have known for several years already a type of mixed reports (that included sustainability disclosure and non- financial data). The aim of this paper is to examine the influence of integrated reporting (IR) on the sustainability reporting practices of these entities. This paper presents a useful analysis of developments in sustainability reporting towards integrated reporting. It describes how reporting has evolved from environmental reporting to broader sustainability reporting, and the latest development towards integrated reporting. Many elements of sustainability reporting, such as the stakeholder perspective and employee participation, link directly to new public management, good governance and transparency. This paper examines the influence of the new introduced concept of integrated reporting (IR) on the sustainability reporting practices of these entities, using mostly a documentary research approach and its main objective is to characterize the recent stage in the development of integrated reporting, incorporating the newest ideas, date and featuring new trends in public sector reporting the perspective of adopting an integrated reporting system for public entities. In the case of sustainability reports, which some public sector entities already presents, either voluntarily or as a result of policy and regulation. Sustainability reporting can therefore provide a platform for gathering any sustainability data that is needed in an integrated report. The main limits of the study derives from privation of data needed, reporting practice regarding integrated reports in the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana Dorin & Ioan Rosca & Dana Andreea Costea & Cornel Suciu, 2020. "Integrated Reporting for Public Sector in EU. A case study," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 6(1), pages 121-126, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:121-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_321.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_321.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Milne & Rob Gray, 2013. "W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 13-29, November.
    2. Stefania Lamprinidi & Naoko Kubo, 2008. "Debate: The Global Reporting Initiative and Public Agencies," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 326-329, December.
    3. Adams, Carol A., 2015. "The International Integrated Reporting Council: A call to action," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 23-28.
    4. Dorothea Greiling & Birgit Grüb, 2014. "Sustainability reporting in Austrian and German local public enterprises," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 209-223, September.
    5. Luca Bartocci & Francesca Picciaia, 2013. "Towards Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector," Springer Books, in: Cristiano Busco & Mark L. Frigo & Angelo Riccaboni & Paolo Quattrone (ed.), Integrated Reporting, edition 127, chapter 12, pages 191-204, Springer.
    6. John Dumay & James Guthrie & Federica Farneti, 2010. "Gri Sustainability Reporting Guidelines For Public And Third Sector Organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 531-548, July.
    7. Ludger Niemann & Thomas Hoppe, 2018. "Sustainability reporting by local governments: a magic tool? Lessons on use and usefulness from European pioneers," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 201-223, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Nicol? & Gianluca Zanellato & Francesca Manes-Rossi & Adriana Tiron-Tudor, 2019. "Beyond Financial Reporting. Integrated Reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the context of European state-owned enterprises," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(2), pages 43-72.
    2. Wendy Stubbs & Colin Higgins, 2018. "Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Role of Regulatory Reform in Integrated Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 489-508, February.
    3. Jukka Mähönen, 2020. "Comprehensive Approach to Relevant and Reliable Reporting in Europe: A Dream Impossible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-38, June.
    4. Renato Camodeca & Alex Almici & Umberto Sagliaschi, 2018. "Sustainability Disclosure in Integrated Reporting: Does It Matter to Investors? A Cheap Talk Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-34, November.
    5. Roslender, Robin & Nielsen, Christian, 2021. "Accounting for the value expectations of customers: Re-imagining the Integrated Reporting initiative," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Mähönen Jukka, 2020. "Integrated Reporting and Sustainable Corporate Governance from European Perspective," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-40, July.
    7. Ralph Adler & Mansi Mansi & Rakesh Pandey, 2022. "Accounting for waste management: a study of the reporting practices of the top listed Indian companies," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2401-2437, June.
    8. Niccol? Comerio & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2019. "Systematic literature network analysis in accounting: A first application on integrated reporting research," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(2), pages 73-95.
    9. Francisco J. Alcaraz-Quiles & Andrés Navarro-Galera & David Ortiz-Rodríguez, 2020. "The contribution of the right to information laws in Europe to local government transparency on sustainability," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 161-178, March.
    10. Caterina Cavicchi & Chiara Oppi & Emidia Vagnoni, 2019. "On the feasibility of integrated reporting in healthcare: a context analysis starting from a management commentary," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 345-371, June.
    11. de Villiers, Charl & Sharma, Umesh, 2020. "A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Lodovico Gherardi & Anna Maria Linsalata & Enrico Deidda Gagliardo & Rebecca Levy Orelli, 2021. "Accountability and Reporting for Sustainability and Public Value: Challenges in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Elisabeth Albertini, 2019. "Integrated reporting: an exploratory study of French companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 513-535, June.
    14. Lucia Biondi & Enrico Bracci, 2018. "Sustainability, Popular and Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector: A Fad and Fashion Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Stephen N. Hamilton & Richard D. Waters, 2022. "Mainstreaming Standardized Sustainability Reporting: Comparing Fortune 50 Corporations’ and U.S. News & World Report’s Top 50 Global Universities’ Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Tweedie, Dale, 2018. "After Habermas: Applying Axel Honneth’s critical theory in accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 39-55.
    17. Alexander, David & Blum, Véronique, 2016. "Ecological economics: A Luhmannian analysis of integrated reporting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 241-251.
    18. Genevé Richard & Elza Odendaal, 2021. "Credibility-enhancing mechanisms, other than external assurance, in integrated reporting," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 61-93, March.
    19. Frías Aceituno, José Valeriano & Marques, Maria da Conceição & Rodríguez Ariza, Lázaro, 2013. "Divulgación de información sostenible: ¿se adapta a las expectativas de la sociedad?," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 147-158.
    20. Journeault, Marc & Levant, Yves & Picard, Claire-France, 2021. "Sustainability performance reporting: A technocratic shadowing and silencing," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Integrated Reporting; Sustainability Reporting; Public Sector;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:121-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.