IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v42y2015i3p435-447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of the minimum size of the shared-car fleet required to satisfy car-driving trips in Montreal

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Morency
  • Hubert Verreault
  • Marie Demers

Abstract

This paper examines how many cars would be required to fulfill all car driver trips in a metropolitan area if these cars were shared rather than privately controlled. It proposes a twofold analysis regarding the use of cars in urban areas using data from a large scale Origin–Destination travel survey conducted in the Greater Montreal Area in 2008 as case study. In a first step, the use of privately owned cars and their level of usage are assessed through indicators such as the proportion of daily time parked at home location, parked elsewhere and travelling. In the region, 27 % of the owned cars are not used during a typical weekday. According to the estimations, a car will, on average, be parked more than 95 % of the time. In a second step, the research simulates a full-scale mutualization of cars in the region. Cars required to fulfill all car driver trips observed in the survey are generated based on two hypotheses of access distance to the shared cars (250 and 500 m cells). It was found that between 48 and 59 % of the current fleet of privately owned cars would be sufficient to fulfill all car driver trips at the metropolitan level. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Morency & Hubert Verreault & Marie Demers, 2015. "Identification of the minimum size of the shared-car fleet required to satisfy car-driving trips in Montreal," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 435-447, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:42:y:2015:i:3:p:435-447
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-015-9605-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11116-015-9605-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-015-9605-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phil Goodwin, 2012. "Peak Travel, Peak Car and the Future of Mobility: Evidence, Unresolved Issues, and Policy Implications, and a Research Agenda," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2012/13, OECD Publishing.
    2. Martin, Elliot & Shaheen, Susan Alison & Lidicker, Jeffrey, 2010. "Carsharing’S Impact On Household Vehicle Holdings: Results From A North American Shared-Use Vehicle Survey," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0850h6r5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam P. & Roberts, J. Darius, 2005. "Carsharing in North America: Market Growth, Current Developments, and Future Potential," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt68n01997, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam P. & Roberts, J. Darius, 2005. "Carsharing In North America: Market Growth, Current Developments, And Future Potential," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4h62q7mg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Martin, Elliot & Shaheen, Susan Alison & Lidicker, Jeffrey, 2010. "Carsharing’S Impact On Household Vehicle Holdings: Results From A North American Shared-Use Vehicle Survey," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0850h6r5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam P. & Roberts, J. Darius, 2005. "Carsharing in North America: Market Growth, Current Developments, and Future Potential," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6fp4v916, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Namazu, Michiko & MacKenzie, Don & Zerriffi, Hisham & Dowlatabadi, Hadi, 2018. "Is carsharing for everyone? Understanding the diffusion of carsharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 189-199.
    2. Frederik Plewnia & Edeltraud Guenther, 2017. "Advancing a sustainable sharing economy with interdisciplinary research [Der Beitrag interdisziplinärer Forschung zu einer nachhaltigen Sharing Economy]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 117-124, June.
    3. Georgina Santos, 2018. "Sustainability and Shared Mobility Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Xiaohuan Xie & Shiyu Qin & Zhonghua Gou & Ming Yi, 2020. "Can Green Building Promote Pro-Environmental Behaviours? The Psychological Model and Design Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Fabian Pütz & Finbarr Murphy & Martin Mullins, 2019. "Driving to a future without accidents? Connected automated vehicles’ impact on accident frequency and motor insurance risk," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 383-395, December.
    6. Khalek, Sk Abu & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2022. "“I like to use but do not wish to own†: Exploring the role of de-ownership orientation in the adoption of access-based services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaheen, Susan & Martin, Elliot, 2006. "Assessing Early Market Potential for Carsharing in China: A Case Study of Beijing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9hf9784f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Barth, Matthew & Shaheen, Susan & Fukuda, Tuenjai & Fukuda, Atsushi, 2005. "Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: An Overview of Japan and Singapore," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4qw379rx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Kent, Jennifer & Dowling, Robyn & Maalsen, Sophia, 2017. "Catalysts for transport transitions: Bridging the gap between disruptions and change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 200-207.
    4. Barth, Matthew & Shaheen, Susan A & Fukuda, Tuenjai & Fukuda, Atsushi, 2006. "Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: Overview of Japan and Singapore," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2162b2zt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Barth, Matthew & Shaheen, Susan & Fukuda, Tuenjai & Fukuda, Atsushi, 2005. "Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: An Overview of Japan and Singapore," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt70c4c1v8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Schwieterman, Joseph P. & Bieszczat, Alice, 2017. "The cost to carshare: A review of the changing prices and taxation levels for carsharing in the United States 2011–2016," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Catalano, Mario & Lo Casto, Barbara & Migliore, Marco, 2008. "Car sharing demand estimation and urban transport demand modelling using stated preference techniques," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 40, pages 33-50.
    8. Lovejoy, Kristin, 2012. "Mobility Fulfillment Among Low-car Households: Implications for Reducing Auto Dependence in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4v44b5qn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Boyacı, Burak & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2019. "Investigating the effect of temporal and spatial flexibility on the performance of one-way electric carsharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 244-272.
    10. Yue Guo & Fu Xin & Xiaotong Li, 2020. "The market impacts of sharing economy entrants: evidence from USA and China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 629-649, September.
    11. Golalikhani, Masoud & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando & Antunes, António Pais, 2021. "Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Xin-Wei Li & Hong-Zhi Miao, 2023. "How to Incorporate Autonomous Vehicles into the Carbon Neutrality Framework of China: Legal and Policy Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Susan Shaheen & Nelson Chan & Helen Micheaux, 2015. "One-way carsharing’s evolution and operator perspectives from the Americas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 519-536, May.
    14. Matthew Clark & Kate Gifford & Jillian Anable & Scott Le Vine, 2015. "Business-to-business carsharing: evidence from Britain of factors associated with employer-based carsharing membership and its impacts," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 471-495, May.
    15. Diana, Marco & Chicco, Andrea, 2022. "The spatial reconfiguration of parking demand due to car sharing diffusion: a simulated scenario for the cities of Milan and Turin (Italy)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Irfan Ullah & Kai Liu & Tran Vanduy, 2019. "Examining Travelers’ Acceptance towards Car Sharing Systems—Peshawar City, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Wu, Guoqiang & Hong, Jinhyun & Thakuriah, Piyushimita, 2019. "Assessing the relationships between young adults’ travel and use of the internet over time," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 8-19.
    18. Yuan, Ruizhi & Luo, Jun & Liu, Martin J. & Yu, Jiang, 2022. "Understanding organizational resilience in a platform-based sharing business: The role of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 85-99.
    19. Susanna Ulinski, 2015. "Corporate Social Innovation as a Driver of Performance and Welfare. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 25," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58500, February.
    20. Vanduy Tran & Shengchuan Zhao & El Bachir Diop & Weiya Song, 2019. "Travelers’ Acceptance of Electric Carsharing Systems in Developing Countries: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:42:y:2015:i:3:p:435-447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.