IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/rqfnac/v54y2020i1d10.1007_s11156-018-00783-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The usefulness of the double entry constraint for predicting earnings

Author

Listed:
  • Ehsan Khansalar

    (Kingston University)

  • Eilnaz Kashefi-Pour

    (University of Birmingham)

Abstract

In the absence of an income statement, earnings can be calculated as cash flow from operating activities (CFO) plus accruals, rather than being stated as the difference between income statement revenues and expenses. Following the study by Christodoulou and McLeay (Contemp Account Res 31:609:328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12038, 2014), this paper uses a system of structural regressions with a framework of two simultaneous linear models, allowing the most basic property of accounting—double entry bookkeeping—to be incorporated as a constraint. The paper aims to investigate whether the constrained seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) estimator with two simultaneous models, produces lower out-of-sample prediction errors than each standalone model. We also examine if CFO and accruals are more capable of predicting future earnings than income statement earnings and expenses. Our findings show that in predicting earnings: (1) a system of structural regressions with two constrained simultaneous models produces significantly smaller out-of-sample prediction errors than each separate regression; and (2) accruals and CFO produce smaller out-of-sample prediction errors than earnings and expenses.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehsan Khansalar & Eilnaz Kashefi-Pour, 2020. "The usefulness of the double entry constraint for predicting earnings," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 51-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:54:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11156-018-00783-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11156-018-00783-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11156-018-00783-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11156-018-00783-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher F Baum & Mark E. Schaffer & Steven Stillman, 2003. "Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 3(1), pages 1-31, March.
    2. Myungsun Kim & William Kross, 2005. "The Ability of Earnings to Predict Future Operating Cash Flows Has Been Increasing—Not Decreasing," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 753-780, December.
    3. Ijiri, Y & Levy, Fk & Lyon, Rc, 1963. "A Linear-Programming Model For Budgeting And Financial-Planning," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 198-212.
    4. Li Li Eng & Ying Chou Lin, 2012. "Accounting Quality, Earnings Management and Cross-Listings: Evidence from China," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-25.
    5. Paul Hribar & Daniel W. Collins, 2002. "Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 105-134, March.
    6. Demetris Christodoulou, 2018. "The accounting identity trap: identification under stock-and-flow rank deficiency," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(13), pages 1413-1427, March.
    7. Neal Arthur & Marco Cheng & Robert Czernkowski, 2010. "Cash flow disaggregation and the prediction of future earnings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(1), pages 1-30, March.
    8. T. S. Breusch & A. R. Pagan, 1980. "The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 239-253.
    9. Changbao Wu & Bixia Xu, 2008. "Deflator selection and generalized linear modelling in market-based regression analyses," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(21), pages 1739-1753.
    10. Patricia M. Dechow & Scott A. Richardson & Richard G. Sloan, 2008. "The Persistence and Pricing of the Cash Component of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 537-566, June.
    11. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    12. Mark E. Evans & Kenneth Njoroge & Kevin Ow Yong, 2017. "An Examination of the Statistical Significance and Economic Relevance of Profitability and Earnings Forecasts from Models and Analysts," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 1453-1488, September.
    13. Gopal V. Krishnan & James A. Largay III, 2000. "The Predictive Ability of Direct Method Cash Flow Information," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1‐2), pages 215-245, January.
    14. Gopal V. Krishnan & James A. Largay III, 2000. "The Predictive Ability of Direct Method Cash Flow Information," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1&2), pages 215-245.
    15. Hou, Kewei & van Dijk, Mathijs A. & Zhang, Yinglei, 2012. "The implied cost of capital: A new approach," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 504-526.
    16. Demetris Christodoulou & Stuart Mcleay, 2014. "The Double Entry Constraint, Structural Modeling and Econometric Estimation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 609-628, June.
    17. Pfeiffer, RJ & Elgers, PT, 1999. "Controlling for lagged stock price responses in pricing regressions: An application to the pricing of cash flows and accruals," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 239-247.
    18. Konan Chan & Narasimhan Jegadeesh & Theodore Sougiannis, 2004. "The Accrual Effect on Future Earnings," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 97-121, March.
    19. Ehsan Khansalar & Mohammad Namazi, 2017. "Cash flow disaggregation and prediction of cash flow," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(4), pages 464-479, November.
    20. Nelson, Karen K. & Barth, Mary E. & Cram, Donald, 2001. "Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash Flows," Research Papers 1594r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    21. Burgstahler, David & Dichev, Ilia, 1997. "Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 99-126, December.
    22. Collins, Daniel W. & Hribar, Paul, 2000. "Earnings-based and accrual-based market anomalies: one effect or two?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 101-123, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Bánociová & Slavomíra Ťahlová, 2020. "Tax Loss Amortization of Companies in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Kent & Jacqueline Birt, 2021. "IAS 7 and value relevance: the direct method versus the indirect method," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1532-1586, December.
    2. Li Yu (Colly) He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2018. "Is fair value information relevant to investment decision-making: Evidence from the Australian agricultural sector?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 555-574, November.
    3. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    4. Takashi Obinata, 2002. "Concept and Relevance of Income," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-171, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    5. Shadi Farshadfar & Reza Monem, 2013. "The usefulness of operating cash flow and accrual components in improving the predictive ability of earnings: a re-examination and extension," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(4), pages 1061-1082, December.
    6. Baljit K. Sidhu & CHUAN YU, 2021. "Direct Method Operating Cash Flow Disclosures: Determinants and Incremental Usefulness," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 421-467, September.
    7. Iain Clacher & Alan Duboisée Ricquebourg & Allan Hodgson, 2013. "The Value Relevance of Direct Cash Flows under International Financial Reporting Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(3), pages 367-395, September.
    8. Ming‐Chang Wang & Yu‐Jia Ding, 2021. "Does the quarterly accrual anomaly exist in Taiwan's stock market? Evidence from Manager's earnings management," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 688-701, April.
    9. Ahmad Nasseri & Mohammad Sayyadi & Hassan Yazdifar & Rasol Eskandari & Mohammad Albahloul, 2018. "Causality between Cash Flow and Earnings: Evidence from Tehran (Iran) Stock Exchange," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(2), pages 210-228, August.
    10. C. Cheng & Dana Hollie, 2008. "Do core and non-core cash flows from operations persist differentially in predicting future cash flows?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 29-53, July.
    11. Coulton, Jeffrey J. & Saune, Naibuka & Taylor, Stephen L., 2022. "Are analysts' cash flow forecasts associated with improved earnings quality? Australian evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Troy Pollard, 2016. "Sneaking in the back door? An evaluation of reverse mergers and IPOs," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 305-341, August.
    13. Farshadfar, Shadi & Monem, Reza, 2013. "Further Evidence on the Usefulness of Direct Method Cash Flow Components for Forecasting Future Cash Flows," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 111-133.
    14. Zhi‐an Hu & Zhuo Huang & Dawei Lin & Zhimin Qiu, 2022. "Have existing theories explained the accrual anomaly? An evaluation based on the decomposition method," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3645-3675, September.
    15. Michael Bradbury, 2011. "Direct or Indirect Cash Flow Statements?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(2), pages 124-130, June.
    16. Neal Arthur & Marco Cheng & Robert Czernkowski, 2010. "Cash flow disaggregation and the prediction of future earnings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(1), pages 1-30, March.
    17. Badertscher, Brad A. & Collins, Daniel W. & Lys, Thomas Z., 2012. "Discretionary accounting choices and the predictive ability of accruals with respect to future cash flows," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 330-352.
    18. Chad R. Larson & Richard Sloan & Jenny Zha Giedt, 2018. "Defining, measuring, and modeling accruals: a guide for researchers," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 827-871, September.
    19. Abhijit Barua & Joseph Legoria & Jacquelyn Sue Moffitt, 2006. "Accruals Management to Achieve Earnings Benchmarks: A Comparison of Pre‐managed Profit and Loss Firms," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5‐6), pages 653-670, June.
    20. Mundt, Philipp & Alfarano, Simone & Milaković, Mishael, 2020. "Exploiting ergodicity in forecasts of corporate profitability," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Double entry constraint; Accruals; Earnings prediction; Seemingly unrelated regression;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:54:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11156-018-00783-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.