IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v19y2017i3d10.1007_s10109-017-0252-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geospatial cryptography: enabling researchers to access private, spatially referenced, human subjects data for cancer control and prevention

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey M. Jacquez

    (State University of New York at Buffalo
    BioMedware)

  • Aleksander Essex

    (Western University)

  • Andrew Curtis

    (Kent State University)

  • Betsy Kohler

    (North American Association of Central Cancer Registries)

  • Recinda Sherman

    (North American Association of Central Cancer Registries)

  • Khaled El Emam

    (University of Ottawa)

  • Chen Shi

    (State University of New York at Buffalo)

  • Andy Kaufmann

    (BioMedware)

  • Linda Beale

    (Esri)

  • Thomas Cusick

    (University at Buffalo)

  • Daniel Goldberg

    (Texas A&M University
    Texas A&M University)

  • Pierre Goovaerts

    (BioMedware)

Abstract

As the volume, accuracy and precision of digital geographic information have increased, concerns regarding individual privacy and confidentiality have come to the forefront. Not only do these challenge a basic tenet underlying the advancement of science by posing substantial obstacles to the sharing of data to validate research results, but they are obstacles to conducting certain research projects in the first place. Geospatial cryptography involves the specification, design, implementation and application of cryptographic techniques to address privacy, confidentiality and security concerns for geographically referenced data. This article defines geospatial cryptography and demonstrates its application in cancer control and surveillance. Four use cases are considered: (1) national‐level de‐duplication among state or province‐based cancer registries; (2) sharing of confidential data across cancer registries to support case aggregation across administrative geographies; (3) secure data linkage; and (4) cancer cluster investigation and surveillance. A secure multi-party system for geospatial cryptography is developed. Solutions under geospatial cryptography are presented and computation time is calculated. As services provided by cancer registries to the research community, de-duplication, case aggregation across administrative geographies and secure data linkage are often time-consuming and in some instances precluded by confidentiality and security concerns. Geospatial cryptography provides secure solutions that hold significant promise for addressing these concerns and for accelerating the pace of research with human subjects data residing in our nation’s cancer registries. Pursuit of the research directions posed herein conceivably would lead to a geospatially encrypted geographic information system (GEGIS) designed specifically to promote the sharing and spatial analysis of confidential data. Geospatial cryptography holds substantial promise for accelerating the pace of research with spatially referenced human subjects data.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey M. Jacquez & Aleksander Essex & Andrew Curtis & Betsy Kohler & Recinda Sherman & Khaled El Emam & Chen Shi & Andy Kaufmann & Linda Beale & Thomas Cusick & Daniel Goldberg & Pierre Goovaerts, 2017. "Geospatial cryptography: enabling researchers to access private, spatially referenced, human subjects data for cancer control and prevention," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 197-220, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:19:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10109-017-0252-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10109-017-0252-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10109-017-0252-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10109-017-0252-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myron Gutmann & Kristine Witkowski & Corey Colyer & JoAnne O’Rourke & James McNally, 2008. "Providing Spatial Data for Secondary Analysis: Issues and Current Practices Relating to Confidentiality," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 27(6), pages 639-665, December.
    2. Roger J. Marshall, 1991. "A Review of Methods for the Statistical Analysis of Spatial Patterns of Disease," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 154(3), pages 421-441, May.
    3. Wartenberg, D. & Thompson, W.D., 2010. "Privacy versus public health: The impact of current confidentiality rules," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(3), pages 407-412.
    4. Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), 2010. "Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-03647-7, November.
    5. Khaled El Emam & Saeed Samet & Jun Hu & Liam Peyton & Craig Earle & Gayatri C Jayaraman & Tom Wong & Murat Kantarcioglu & Fida Dankar & Aleksander Essex, 2012. "A Protocol for the Secure Linking of Registries for HPV Surveillance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Diez-Roux, A.V., 1998. "Bringing context back into epidemiology: Variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(2), pages 216-222.
    7. Vassilios S. Verykios & Alexandros Karakasidis & Vassilios K. Mitrogiannis, 2009. "Privacy preserving record linkage approaches," International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 206-221.
    8. John M. Abowd & Julia I. Lane, 2004. "New Approaches to Confidentiality Protection Synthetic Data, Remote Access and Research Data Centers," Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Technical Papers 2004-03, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haley, Danielle F. & Matthews, Stephen A. & Cooper, Hannah L.F. & Haardörfer, Regine & Adimora, Adaora A. & Wingood, Gina M. & Kramer, Michael R., 2016. "Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 49-56.
    2. repec:asg:wpaper:1052 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. López-Carr, David & Davis, Jason & Jankowska, Marta M. & Grant, Laura & López-Carr, Anna Carla & Clark, Matthew, 2012. "Space versus place in complex human–natural systems: Spatial and multi-level models of tropical land use and cover change (LUCC) in Guatemala," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 64-75.
    4. Chocholatá Michaela & Furková Andrea, 2017. "Regional Disparities in Education Attainment Level in the European Union: A Spatial Approach," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 107-131, October.
    5. Motoyama, Yasuyuki & Cao, Cong & Appelbaum, Richard, 2014. "Observing regional divergence of Chinese nanotechnology centers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 11-21.
    6. Rey, Sergio, 2015. "Bells in Space: The Spatial Dynamics of US Interpersonal and Interregional Income Inequality," MPRA Paper 69482, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Chih-Hao Wang & Na Chen, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing economic efficiency and equity in accessibility to multi-use paths," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1967-1986, August.
    8. Padovano, Fabio & Petrarca, Ilaria, 2014. "Are the responsibility and yardstick competition hypotheses mutually consistent?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 459-477.
    9. Bolte, Gabriele, 2018. "Epidemiologische Methoden und Erkenntnisse als eine Grundlage für Stadtplanung und gesundheitsfördernde Stadtentwicklung," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Baumgart, Sabine & Köckler, Heike & Ritzinger, Anne & Rüdiger, Andrea (ed.), Planung für gesundheitsfördernde Städte, volume 8, pages 118-134, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    10. Atems, Bebonchu, 2013. "The spatial dynamics of growth and inequality: Evidence using U.S. county-level data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 19-22.
    11. Giuseppe Espa & Giuseppe Arbia & Diego Giuliani, 2013. "Conditional versus unconditional industrial agglomeration: disentangling spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity in the analysis of ICT firms’ distribution in Milan," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 31-50, January.
    12. Spielman, Seth E. & Yoo, Eun-hye, 2009. "The spatial dimensions of neighborhood effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1098-1105, March.
    13. Manfred M. Fischer & Nico Pintar & Benedikt Sargant, 2016. "Austrian Outbound Foreign Direct Investment in Europe:A spatial econometric study," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, JUNE.
    14. Manfred Fischer, 2011. "A spatial Mankiw–Romer–Weil model: theory and evidence," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(2), pages 419-436, October.
    15. Kaixing Huang & Wenshou Yan & Jikun Huang, 2020. "Agricultural subsidies retard urbanisation in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1308-1327, October.
    16. Samantha Leorato & Maura Mezzetti, 2015. "Spatial Panel Data Model with error dependence: a Bayesian Separable Covariance Approach," CEIS Research Paper 338, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 09 Apr 2015.
    17. Mohl, Philipp & Hagen, Tobias, 2011. "Do EU structural funds promote regional employment? Evidence from dynamic panel data models," Working Paper Series 1403, European Central Bank.
    18. Daniel A. Griffith & Manfred M. Fischer, 2016. "Constrained Variants of the Gravity Model and Spatial Dependence: Model Specification and Estimation Issues," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Roberto Patuelli & Giuseppe Arbia (ed.), Spatial Econometric Interaction Modelling, chapter 0, pages 37-66, Springer.
    19. Cristina LINCARU & Vasilica CIUCA & Draga ATANASIU, 2015. "THE TENDENCY IDENTIFICATION OF OVERALL CLUSTERING OF REGISTERED UNEMPLOYMENT AT TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT LEVEL - UAT2 IN ROMANIA (International Conference “EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE OF LABOR MARKET ," Institute for Economic Forecasting Conference Proceedings 141104, Institute for Economic Forecasting.
    20. Carlos Díaz-Venegas, 2014. "Identifying the Confounders of Marginalization and Mortality in Mexico, 2003–2007," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 851-875, September.
    21. Dusan Paredes Araya & Tomothy M Komarek, 2013. "Spatial Income Inequality in Chile and the Rol of Spatial Labor Sorting," Documentos de Trabajo en Economia y Ciencia Regional 46, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2013.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Geospatial cryptography; Geographic information science; Spatial methods; Human subjects research; Privacy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:19:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10109-017-0252-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.