IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v72y2007i2p197-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cheating During the College Years: How do Business School Students Compare?

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Klein
  • Nancy Levenburg
  • Marie McKendall
  • William Mothersell

Abstract

When it comes to cheating in higher education, business school students have often been accused of being the worst offenders; if true, this may be a contributing factor in the kinds of fraud that have plagued the business community in recent years. We examined the issue of cheating in the business school by surveying 268 students in business and other professional schools on their attitudes about, and experiences with, cheating. We found that while business school students actually cheated no more or less than students in other professional schools, their attitudes on what constitutes cheating are more lax than those of other professional school students. Additionally, we found that serious cheaters across all professional schools were more likely to be younger and have a lower grade point average. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Klein & Nancy Levenburg & Marie McKendall & William Mothersell, 2007. "Cheating During the College Years: How do Business School Students Compare?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 197-206, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:72:y:2007:i:2:p:197-206
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9165-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-006-9165-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-006-9165-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald L. McCabe & Linda Klebe Trevino & Kenneth D. Butterfield, 2001. "Dishonesty in Academic Environments," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 29-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacob Joseph & Kevin Berry & Satish Deshpande, 2009. "Impact of Emotional Intelligence and Other Factors on Perception of Ethical Behavior of Peers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 539-546, November.
    2. Cam Caldwell, 2010. "A Ten-Step Model for Academic Integrity: A Positive Approach for Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Maité Laméris & Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Anne-Marie Van Prooijen, 2019. "What have we done? The impact of choosing and studying different academic disciplines on beliefs and values," Working Papers CEB 19-007, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Joanne Jones & Gary Spraakman, 2011. "A Case of Academic Misconduct: Does Self‐Interest Rule?," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Elodie Gentina & Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Qinxuan Gu, 2017. "Does Bad Company Corrupt Good Morals? Social Bonding and Academic Cheating among French and Chinese Teens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 639-667, December.
    6. Mark Simkin & Alexander McLeod, 2010. "Why Do College Students Cheat?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 441-453, July.
    7. Rafik Elias, 2009. "The Impact of Anti-Intellectualism Attitudes and Academic Self-Efficacy on Business Students’ Perceptions of Cheating," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 199-209, May.
    8. Lam D. Nguyen & Quan H. M. Tran, 2018. "Working Adults and Personal Business Ethics in South East Asia: a Comparative Study in Thailand and Vietnam," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 159-174, June.
    9. Elinda Esa & Abdul Rahman Zahari, 2015. "The relationship between personal traits and accounting students perception on ethics and love of money: Case of Malaysian government-linked university," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(8), pages 174-182, August.
    10. Smith, Kenneth J. & Emerson, David J. & Haight, Timothy D. & Mauldin, Shawn & Wood, Bob G., 2019. "An examination of the psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD-RISC10) among accounting and business students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 48-62.
    11. Yoav Gal & Adiv Gal, 2019. "Knowledge Bias: Neo-feudalism and Other Reasons to Avoid Sharing Knowledge by Knowledge Workers," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 826-848, June.
    12. Cristina Neesham & Jun Gu, 2015. "Strengthening Moral Judgment: A Moral Identity-Based Leverage Strategy in Business Ethics Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 527-534, October.
    13. James Bloodgood & William Turnley & Peter Mudrack, 2010. "Ethics Instruction and the Perceived Acceptability of Cheating," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 23-37, August.
    14. Jason MacGregor & Martin Stuebs, 2014. "The Silent Samaritan Syndrome: Why the Whistle Remains Unblown," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 149-164, March.
    15. Togara Warinda, 2017. "Academic Dishonesty: Prior perceptions and behaviour on cheating of Bachelor of Accountancy Freshmen at a Zimbabwean university," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(6), pages 82-93.
    16. Maribel Blasco, 2022. "“We’re Just Geeks”: Disciplinary Identifications Among Business Students and Their Implications for Personal Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 279-302, June.
    17. Jeffrey Roberts & David Wasieleski, 2012. "Moral Reasoning in Computer-Based Task Environments: Exploring the Interplay between Cognitive and Technological Factors on Individuals’ Propensity to Break Rules," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 355-376, October.
    18. Robert T. Burrus Jr. & Adam T. Jones & Bill Sackley & Mike Walker, 2013. "It's The Students, Stupid: How Perceptions of Student Reporting Impact Cheating," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 58(1), pages 51-59, May.
    19. Sundemo, Mattias & Löfgren, Åsa, 2022. "Do business and economics studies erode prosocial values?," Working Papers in Economics 827, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2024.
    20. Bahaudin Mujtaba & Reza Tajaddini & Lisa Chen, 2011. "Business Ethics Perceptions of Public and Private Sector Iranians," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 433-447, December.
    21. Timothy Paul Cronan & Jeffrey K. Mullins & David E. Douglas, 2018. "Further Understanding Factors that Explain Freshman Business Students’ Academic Integrity Intention and Behavior: Plagiarism and Sharing Homework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 197-220, January.
    22. Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba & Prof. Dr. Talat Afza, 2011. "Business Ethics Perceptions of Public and Private Sector Respondents in Pakistan," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, April.
    23. Togara Warinda & Blessing Muchenje, 2013. "Academic Dishonesty: How Do Part-Time and Full-Time Accounting Students Compare?," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(4), pages 1020-1029, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Bucciol & Simona Cicognani & Natalia Montinari, 2017. "Cheating in Academia: The Relevance of Social Factors," Working Papers 15/2017, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    2. Brent J. Davis & Tarek Jaber‐Lopez, 2023. "Do voluntary commitment mechanisms improve welfare? The effect of mandatory and voluntary oaths in a social dilemma," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 525-540, April.
    3. Kevin L. Eastman & Jacqueline K. Eastman & Rajesh Iyer, 2008. "Academic Dishonesty: An Exploratory Study Examining Whether Insurance Students Are Different From Other College Students," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 11(1), pages 209-226, March.
    4. David Pascual-Ezama & Derek Dunfield & Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño & Drazen Prelec, 2015. "Peer Effects in Unethical Behavior: Standing or Reputation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Dench, Daniel & Joyce, Theodore, 2022. "Information and credible sanctions in curbing online cheating among undergraduates: A field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 408-427.
    6. Evgeniia Shmeleva & Tatiana Semenova, 2019. "Academic Dishonesty among College Students: Academic Motivation vs Contextual Factors," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 101-129.
    7. Heather M. O'Neill & Christian A. Pfeiffer, 2012. "The Impact of Honour Codes and Perceptions of Cheating on Academic Cheating Behaviours, Especially for MBA Bound Undergraduates," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 231-245, February.
    8. Jennifer Kisamore & Thomas Stone & I. Jawahar, 2007. "Academic Integrity: The Relationship between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 381-394, November.
    9. Jason MacGregor & Martin Stuebs, 2014. "The Silent Samaritan Syndrome: Why the Whistle Remains Unblown," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 149-164, March.
    10. Robert T. Burrus Jr. & Adam T. Jones & Bill Sackley & Mike Walker, 2013. "It's The Students, Stupid: How Perceptions of Student Reporting Impact Cheating," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 58(1), pages 51-59, May.
    11. Шмелева Е. Д. & Семенова Т. В., 2019. "Академическое мошенничество студентов: учебная мотивация vs образовательная среда," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 101-129.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:72:y:2007:i:2:p:197-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.