IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbioec/v16y2014i2p213-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Removing biases in forecasts of fishery status

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Costello
  • Olivier Deschênes
  • Ashley Larsen
  • Steven Gaines

Abstract

A recent highly cited paper from this journal develops a model predicting maximum sustainable yield ( $$MSY$$ MSY ) of a fishery using the historical maximum catch ( $$MaxCatch$$ MaxCatch ). The model is parameterized with a small sample of fisheries from the United States, and is subsequently applied globally to estimate the benefits of fishery recovery. That empirical relationship has been adopted for many subsequent high-profile analyses. Unfortunately, the analysis suffers from two important oversights: (1) because the model is non-linear, it suffers from “retransformation bias” and therefore the results significantly understate $$MSY$$ MSY and (2) the analysis is parameterized from of a very limited data set and so generalizability of the fitted empirical relationship between $$MSY$$ MSY and $$MaxCatch$$ MaxCatch to global fisheries is questionable. Here, we rectify both oversights and provide an updated estimate of the relationship between $$MSY$$ MSY and $$MaxCatch$$ MaxCatch . Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Costello & Olivier Deschênes & Ashley Larsen & Steven Gaines, 2014. "Removing biases in forecasts of fishery status," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 213-219, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbioec:v:16:y:2014:i:2:p:213-219
    DOI: 10.1007/s10818-013-9158-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10818-013-9158-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10818-013-9158-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. U. Srinivasan & William Cheung & Reg Watson & U. Sumaila, 2010. "Food security implications of global marine catch losses due to overfishing," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 183-200, October.
    2. Ussif Rashid Sumaila & William Cheung & Andrew Dyck & Kamal Gueye & Ling Huang & Vicky Lam & Daniel Pauly & Thara Srinivasan & Wilf Swartz & Reginald Watson & Dirk Zeller, 2012. "Benefits of Rebuilding Global Marine Fisheries Outweigh Costs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Srinivasan, U. Thara & Watson, Reg & Rashid Sumaila, U., 2012. "Global fisheries losses at the exclusive economic zone level, 1950 to present," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 544-549.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wisdom Akpalu, 2013. "Foreign Aid and Sustainable Fisheries Management in Sub-Saharan Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-100, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Akpalu, Wisdom, 2013. "Foreign Aid and Sustainable Fisheries Management in Sub-Saharan Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 100, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Schuhbauer, Anna & Sumaila, U. Rashid, 2016. "Economic viability and small-scale fisheries — A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 69-75.
    4. Cleasby, Nathan & Schwarz, Anne-Maree & Phillips, Michael & Paul, Chris & Pant, Jharendu & Oeta, Janet & Pickering, Tim & Meloty, Alex & Laumani, Michael & Kori, Max, 2014. "The socio-economic context for improving food security through land based aquaculture in Solomon Islands: A peri-urban case study," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 89-97.
    5. Dennis, Darren & Plagányi, Éva & Van Putten, Ingrid & Hutton, Trevor & Pascoe, Sean, 2015. "Cost benefit of fishery-independent surveys: Are they worth the money?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 108-115.
    6. Hubold, Gerd & Klepper, Rainer, 2013. "Die Bedeutung von Fischerei und Aquakultur für die globale Ernährungssicherung," Thünen Working Papers 3, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    7. Muallil, Richard N. & Mamauag, Samuel S. & Cababaro, Jeffrey T. & Arceo, Hazel O. & Aliño, Porfirio M., 2014. "Catch trends in Philippine small-scale fisheries over the last five decades: The fishers׳ perspectives," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 110-117.
    8. Leonid Gokhberg & Ilya Kuzminov & Pavel Bakhtin & Elena Tochilina & Alexander Chulok & Anton Timofeev & Alina Lavrinenko, 2017. "Big-Data-Augmented Approach to Emerging Technologies Identification: Case of Agriculture and Food Sector," HSE Working papers WP BRP 76/STI/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. Gordon Munro & U. Sumaila, 2015. "On the Contributions of Colin Clark to Fisheries Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(1), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Andrés M Cisneros-Montemayor & Daniel Pauly & Lauren V Weatherdon & Yoshitaka Ota, 2016. "A Global Estimate of Seafood Consumption by Coastal Indigenous Peoples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Louise Teh & Vicky Lam & William Cheung & Dana Miller & Lydia Teh & U. Rashid Sumaila, 2017. "Impact of high seas closure on food security in low-income fish-dependent countries," Chapters, in: Paulo A.L.D. Nunes & Lisa E. Svensson & Anil Markandya (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Management of Sustainable Oceans, chapter 11, pages 232-262, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. U. Srinivasan & William Cheung & Reg Watson & U. Sumaila, 2014. "Response to removing biases in forecasts of fishery status," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 221-222, July.
    13. Tim Cashion & Santiago de la Puente & Dyhia Belhabib & Daniel Pauly & Dirk Zeller & U Rashid Sumaila, 2018. "Establishing company level fishing revenue and profit losses from fisheries: A bottom-up approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Fabrizio D’Ascenzo & Andrea Rocchi & Stefano Cerioni & Gaetano Zarlenga & Nicolò Passeri & Francesco Piacentini & Cristina Lo Fazio & Cristina Gerardis & Clara Cicatiello, 2022. "Conveying environmental information to fishers: a smartphone application on marine protected areas," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 453-465, September.
    15. Yamazaki, Satoshi & Jennings, Sarah & Quentin Grafton, R. & Kompas, Tom, 2015. "Are marine reserves and harvest control rules substitutes or complements for rebuilding fisheries?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-18.
    16. Sugiawan, Yogi & Islam, Moinul & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "Global marine fisheries with economic growth," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 158-168.
    17. Labonnah Farzana Rahman & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Lubna Alam & Md Azizul Bari & Ussif Rashid Sumaila & Lariyah Mohd Sidek, 2021. "Developing an Ensembled Machine Learning Prediction Model for Marine Fish and Aquaculture Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    18. John Lynham, 2012. "Ecomarkets For Conservation And Sustainable Development in the Coastal Zone," Working Papers 201218, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
    19. Sebastian Villasante & David Rodríguez-González & Manel Antelo, 2013. "On the Non-Compliance in the North Sea Cod Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Cross, Helen, 2015. "Why fish? Using entry-strategies to inform governance of the small-scale sector: A case-study in the Bijagós Archipelago (West Africa)," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 128-135.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Retransformation bias; Fisheries; Maximum sustainable yield; Q22; D57; F01;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery
    • D57 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Input-Output Tables and Analysis
    • F01 - International Economics - - General - - - Global Outlook

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbioec:v:16:y:2014:i:2:p:213-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.