IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v18y2015i3p251-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bicriteria heuristic for an elective surgery scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Inês Marques
  • M. Captivo
  • Margarida Vaz Pato

Abstract

Resource rationalization and reduction of waiting lists for surgery are two main guidelines for hospital units outlined in the Portuguese National Health Plan. This work is dedicated to an elective surgery scheduling problem arising in a Lisbon public hospital. In order to increase the surgical suite’s efficiency and to reduce the waiting lists for surgery, two objectives are considered: maximize surgical suite occupation and maximize the number of surgeries scheduled. This elective surgery scheduling problem consists of assigning an intervention date, an operating room and a starting time for elective surgeries selected from the hospital waiting list. Accordingly, a bicriteria surgery scheduling problem arising in the hospital under study is presented. To search for efficient solutions of the bicriteria optimization problem, the minimization of a weighted Chebyshev distance to a reference point is used. A constructive and improvement heuristic procedure specially designed to address the objectives of the problem is developed and results of computational experiments obtained with empirical data from the hospital are presented. This study shows that by using the bicriteria approach presented here it is possible to build surgical plans with very good performance levels. This method can be used within an interactive approach with the decision maker. It can also be easily adapted to other hospitals with similar scheduling conditions. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Inês Marques & M. Captivo & Margarida Vaz Pato, 2015. "A bicriteria heuristic for an elective surgery scheduling problem," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 251-266, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:18:y:2015:i:3:p:251-266
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-014-9305-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10729-014-9305-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-014-9305-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Roland & Chr. Di Martinelly & F. Riane & Y. Pochet, 2010. "Scheduling an operating theatre under human resource constraints," Post-Print hal-00787093, HAL.
    2. Hans, Erwin & Wullink, Gerhard & van Houdenhoven, Mark & Kazemier, Geert, 2008. "Robust surgery loading," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1038-1050, March.
    3. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2014. "A robust approach for scheduling in hospitals using multiple objectives," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(4), pages 546-556, April.
    4. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    5. Min, Daiki & Yih, Yuehwern, 2010. "Scheduling elective surgery under uncertainty and downstream capacity constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 642-652, November.
    6. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    2. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Riise, Atle & Mannino, Carlo & Lamorgese, Leonardo, 2016. "Recursive logic-based Benders’ decomposition for multi-mode outpatient scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 719-728.
    4. Marques, Inês & Captivo, M. Eugénia, 2017. "Different stakeholders’ perspectives for a surgical case assignment problem: Deterministic and robust approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 260-278.
    5. Roshanaei, Vahid & Luong, Curtiss & Aleman, Dionne M. & Urbach, David R., 2020. "Reformulation, linearization, and decomposition techniques for balanced distributed operating room scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    7. Shing Chih Tsai & Wu Hung Lin & Chia Cheng Wu & Shao Jen Weng & Ching Fen Tang, 2022. "Decision support algorithms for optimizing surgery start times considering the performance variation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 208-221, June.
    8. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Tongzhu Liu & Shanlin Yang & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Dynamic three-stage operating room scheduling considering patient waiting time and surgical overtime costs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 185-215, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    2. Marques, Inês & Captivo, M. Eugénia, 2017. "Different stakeholders’ perspectives for a surgical case assignment problem: Deterministic and robust approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 260-278.
    3. Koppka, Lisa & Wiesche, Lara & Schacht, Matthias & Werners, Brigitte, 2018. "Optimal distribution of operating hours over operating rooms using probabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1156-1171.
    4. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    5. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2019. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 78-93.
    7. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C. & Saldanha, Rodney R. & Burke, Edmund K., 2015. "Surgical scheduling with simultaneous employment of specialised human resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 719-730.
    8. Thomas Schneider, A.J. & Theresia van Essen, J. & Carlier, Mijke & Hans, Erwin W., 2020. "Scheduling surgery groups considering multiple downstream resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 741-752.
    9. Aringhieri, Roberto & Duma, Davide & Landa, Paolo & Mancini, Simona, 2022. "Combining workload balance and patient priority maximisation in operating room planning through hierarchical multi-objective optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 627-643.
    10. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C., 2020. "Surgical scheduling under uncertainty by approximate dynamic programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    11. Hejer Khlif Hachicha & Farah Zeghal Mansour, 2018. "Two-MILP models for scheduling elective surgeries within a private healthcare facility," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 376-392, September.
    12. Anjomshoa, Hamideh & Dumitrescu, Irina & Lustig, Irvin & Smith, Olivia J., 2018. "An exact approach for tactical planning and patient selection for elective surgeries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 728-739.
    13. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2016. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," Discussion Papers on Economics 4/2016, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    14. Nickolas K. Freeman & Sharif H. Melouk & John Mittenthal, 2016. "A Scenario-Based Approach for Operating Theater Scheduling Under Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 245-261, May.
    15. Hossein Hashemi Doulabi & Soheyl Khalilpourazari, 2023. "Stochastic weekly operating room planning with an exponential number of scenarios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 643-664, September.
    16. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    17. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    18. Jose M. Molina-Pariente & Erwin W. Hans & Jose M. Framinan, 2018. "A stochastic approach for solving the operating room scheduling problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 224-251, June.
    19. Michael Samudra & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2017. "Due time driven surgery scheduling," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 326-352, September.
    20. Freeman, Nickolas & Zhao, Ming & Melouk, Sharif, 2018. "An iterative approach for case mix planning under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 160-173.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:18:y:2015:i:3:p:251-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.