IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/iujspc/v0y2019i77p157-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi

Author

Listed:
  • Serpil ÇİĞDEM

    (Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi, Sapanca Meslek Yüksek Okulu, Pazarlama Ve Reklamcılık Bölümü, Sakarya, Türkiye)

Abstract

Çalışma hayatı, son yıllarda büyük bir değişim sürecine girmiştir. Endüstri 4.0 ile birlikte dijital teknolojilerin çalışma hayatına etkisi giderek daha fazla hissedilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, ILO’nun Ekim 2017’de çalışmalarına başlattığı “işin geleceği” girişimi, iş ve çalışma yaşamındaki değişimi ve ihtiyaç duyulan çözümleri ortaya koymayı hedefleyen önemli çalışmalardan biridir. En son Kasım 2018’de gerçekleşen toplantıyla dört kez bir araya gelen İşin Geleceği Küresel Komisyonu, 2019’daki 108. Uluslararası Çalışma Konferansında işin geleceğine ilişkin raporun içeriğini açıklamıştır. Bu kapsamda iş dünyasında gerçekleşen dönüşümlerden biri dijital emek platformlarının ya da gig ekonomisinin giderek büyümesi olmuştur. 2015’ten bu yana dijital platformlar üzerine çalışmalar yapan ILO’nun Ekim 2018’de yayımladığı “Dijital Emek Platformları ve İşin Geleceği” adlı rapor, İşin Geleceği Küresel Komisyonu’nun girişimlerini desteklemek için hazırlanmış önemli çalışmalardan biridir. Bu çalışma, ILO’nun işin geleceğine ilişkin gerçekleştirdiği tematik tartışmalardan değişen iş organizasyonları temelinde, dijital emek platformları ve yeni kendi hesabına çalışma biçimlerinin yükselişini konu edinmektedir. Aynı zamanda insana yakışır iş kavramının bileşenleri olan istihdam, çalışma yaşamına ilişkin temel haklar, sosyal koruma ve sosyal diyalog çerçevesinde dijital emek platformlarının analizi yapılmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda insana yakışır iş açısından en sorunlu alanlardan birinin gig çalışanlar olduğu görülmüştür. Gig ekonomisinde son yıllarda belirgin bir büyüme görülmesine rağmen emek hakları üzerindeki etkisi büyük ölçüde göz ardı edilmektedir.

Suggested Citation

  • Serpil ÇİĞDEM, 2019. "Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(77), pages 157-199, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2019:i:77:p:157-190
    DOI: 10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/917917
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iusskd/issue/51626/670036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Bowles & Fiona MacPhail, 2008. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Pathways from Casual Work to Economic Security: Canadian and International Perspectives," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Laurie Cohen & Mary Mallon, 1999. "The Transition from Organisational Employment to Portfolio Working: Perceptions of `Boundarylessness'," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(2), pages 329-352, June.
    3. Peter J. Kuhn & Herb J. Schuetze, 2001. "Self-employment dynamics and self-employment trends: a study of Canadian men and women, 1982-1998," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 34(3), pages 760-784, August.
    4. Araz Taeihagh, 2017. "Crowdsourcing, Sharing Economies and Development," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 33(2), pages 191-222, June.
    5. Jean-Yves Boulin & Michel Lallement & Jon C. Messenger & François Michon, 2006. "Decent working time. New trends, new Issues," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00265560, HAL.
    6. Alexandrea J. Ravenelle, 2017. "Sharing economy workers: selling, not sharing," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(2), pages 281-295.
    7. Berg, Janine., 2016. "Income security in the on-demand economy : findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers," ILO Working Papers 994906483402676, International Labour Organization.
    8. De Groen, Willem Pieter & Maselli, Ilaria & Fabo, Brian, 2016. "The Digital Market for Local Services: A one-night stand for workers? An example from the on-demand economy," CEPS Papers 11438, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    9. Mehran, Farhad, & Chernyshev, Igor. & Egger, Philippe. & Ritter, Joseph. & Anker, Richard, & Mehran, Farhad,, 2002. "Measuring decent work with statistical indicators," ILO Working Papers 993622623402676, International Labour Organization.
    10. De Groen, Willem Pieter & Maselli, Ilaria, 2016. "The Impact of the Collaborative Economy on the Labour Market," CEPS Papers 11625, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    11. Johnston, Hannah & Land-Kazlauskas, Chris., 2018. "Organizing on-demand representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy," ILO Working Papers 994981993502676, International Labour Organization.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7182 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Dharam GHAI, 2003. "Decent work: Concept and indicators," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 142(2), pages 113-145, June.
    14. Gerald Friedman, 2014. "Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 171-188, April.
    15. Birgit Eberhard & Mickael Podio & Azucena Pérez Alonso & Evita Radovica & Lidija Avotina & Liga Peiseniece & Maria Caamaño Sendon & Alison Gonzales Lozano & Joan Solé-Pla, 2017. "Smart work: The transformation of the labour market due to the fourth industrial revolution (I4.0)," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 10(3), pages 47-66, September.
    16. Kerry Platman, 2004. "‘Portfolio Careers’ and the Search for Flexibility in Later Life," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 18(3), pages 573-599, September.
    17. De Stefano, Valerio., 2016. "The rise of the "just-in-time workforce" : on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the "gig-economy"," ILO Working Papers 994899823402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valerio De Stefano & Antonio Aloisi, 2018. "European legal framework for "digital labour platforms"," JRC Research Reports JRC112243, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Fernandez Macias, 2019. "Digital Labour Platforms in Europe: Numbers, Profiles, and Employment Status of Platform Workers," JRC Research Reports JRC117330, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Lars Hornuf & Daniel Vrankar, 2022. "Hourly Wages in Crowdworking: A Meta-Analysis," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(5), pages 553-573, October.
    4. Heiland, Heiner, 2020. "Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview," WSI Studies 21, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    5. Herrmann, Andrea M. & Zaal, Petra M. & Chappin, Maryse M.H. & Schemmann, Brita & Lühmann, Amelie, 2023. "“We don't need no (higher) education” - How the gig economy challenges the education-income paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    6. Sutherland, Will & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 328-341.
    7. Fabo, B., 2017. "Towards an understanding of job matching using web data," Other publications TiSEM b8b877f2-ae6a-495f-b6cc-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Radosław Malik & Anna Visvizi & Małgorzata Skrzek-Lubasińska, 2021. "The Gig Economy: Current Issues, the Debate, and the New Avenues of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Kevin Hu & Feng Fu, 2021. "Evolutionary Dynamics of Gig Economy Labor Strategies under Technology, Policy and Market Influence," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31, June.
    10. Angela Garcia Calvo & Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2023. "Understanding work in the online platform economy: the narrow, the broad, and the systemic perspectives," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(4), pages 795-814.
    11. Valeria Andreoni, 2020. "The Trap of Success: A Paradox of Scale for Sharing Economy and Degrowth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Valentina Franca & Suzana Laporšek & Ana Arzenšek, 2018. "How to Tackle New Form of Works for a Greater Employment Protection," MIC 2018: Managing Global Diversities; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Bled, Slovenia, 30 May–2 June 2018,, University of Primorska Press.
    13. Tânia FERRARO & Leonor PAIS & Nuno REBELO DOS SANTOS & João Manuel MOREIRA, 2018. "The Decent Work Questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 157(2), pages 243-265, June.
    14. PATACHE, Laura & CHIRU, Claudiu & BEBEȘELEA, Mihaela, 2018. "Rural Employment And Decent Work In Romania," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 18(2), pages 53-62.
    15. Argilés-Bosch, Josep Mª & Ravenda, Diego & Garcia-Blandón, Josep, 2021. "E-commerce and labour tax avoidance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Azzellini, Dario & Greer, Ian & Umney, Charles, 2019. "Limits of the platform economy: Digitalization and marketization in live music," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 154, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    17. Aleksynska, Mariya & Bastrakova, Anastasia & Kharchenko, Natalia Nikolaevna, 2019. "Working Conditions on Digital Labour Platforms: Evidence from a Leading Labour Supply Economy," IZA Discussion Papers 12245, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Marie Nilsen & Trond Kongsvik & Stian Antonsen, 2022. "Taming Proteus: Challenges for Risk Regulation of Powerful Digital Labor Platforms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Fernandez-Macias & Cesira Urzi Brancati & Estrella Gomez Herrera, 2019. "How to quantify what is not seen? Two proposals for measuring platform work," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-01, Joint Research Centre.
    20. Francesco Bogliacino & Valeria Cirillo & Cristiano Codagnone & Marta Fana & Francisco Lupanez-Villanueva & Giuseppe A Veltri, 2019. "Shaping individual preferences for social protection: the case of platform workers," LEM Papers Series 2019/21, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2019:i:77:p:157-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.