IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v18y1984i3p267-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved Algorithms for Estimating Choice Probabilities in the Multinomial Probit Model

Author

Listed:
  • Michael G. Langdon

    (Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England)

Abstract

One of the problems in the application of multinomial probit models has been the lack of a satisfactory algorithm for estimating choice probabilities. The currently used “Clark” method meets most of the requirements, but is subject to errors which are occasionally unacceptably large. This paper describes a new algorithm which, at the expense of some additional complexity, produces estimates of choice probability which never have large errors. This “separated split” method has many similarities to the Clark method, but employs a different type of recursive structure. Examination of higher moments of intermediate utility distributions has enabled an upper limit to be set on the possible size of error for problems with three choice alternatives. A new “correlated logit” choice model has also been developed, which uses the same recursive structure as the separated split. Multinomial Probit model, but assumes an invariant covariance matrix. It has been found to give a surprisingly good approximation to the exact MNP model for problems with up to six choice alternatives, in many cases producing smaller errors than the Clark method. Under appropriate conditions it condenses to become identical to the well known hierarchical logit model.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael G. Langdon, 1984. "Improved Algorithms for Estimating Choice Probabilities in the Multinomial Probit Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 267-299, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:18:y:1984:i:3:p:267-299
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.18.3.267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.18.3.267
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.18.3.267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martinetti, Davide & Geniaux, Ghislain, 2017. "Approximate likelihood estimation of spatial probit models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 30-45.
    2. Bhat, Chandra R., 2018. "New matrix-based methods for the analytic evaluation of the multivariate cumulative normal distribution function," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 238-256.
    3. Batram, Manuel & Bauer, Dietmar, 2019. "On consistency of the MACML approach to discrete choice modelling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:18:y:1984:i:3:p:267-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.