IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v7y1996i5p519-523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More Critical Comments on Knowledge-Based Theories of the Firm

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolai J. Foss

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Copenhagen Business School, Nansensgade 19.6, DK-1366 Copenhagen K, Denmark)

Abstract

This paper continues the critique of knowledge-based theories of the firm that was undertaken in Foss (Foss, N. J. 1996a. Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. 7 (5) 470--476.), specifically criticizing the reasoning in Kogut and Zander (Kogut, B., U. Zander. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7 (5) 502--518.) and Conner and Prahalad (Conner, K. R., C. K. Prahalad. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. 7 (5) 477--501.). I argue that Kogut and Zander (Kogut, B., U. Zander. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7 (5) 502--518.) attempt to explain firm organization in terms of a preference for such organization---a distinctly non-economic mode of explanation---and that Conner and Prahalad fail to sufficiently characterize the nature of the firm, because they identify firm organization with the employment contract and neglect asset-ownership.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolai J. Foss, 1996. "More Critical Comments on Knowledge-Based Theories of the Firm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(5), pages 519-523, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:7:y:1996:i:5:p:519-523
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.7.5.519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.519
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.7.5.519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard N. Langlois, 2002. "Modularity in Technology and Organization," Chapters, in: Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein (ed.), Entrepreneurship and the Firm, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Nicolai J. Foss, 1996. "Firms, Incomplete Contracts and Organizational Learning," DRUID Working Papers 96-2, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    3. Kannan Srikanth & Phanish Puranam, 2014. "The Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Software Services Offshoring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1253-1271, August.
    4. Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & De Silva, Muthu, 2019. "The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    5. Joanne Oxley & Tetsuo Wada, 2009. "Alliance Structure and the Scope of Knowledge Transfer: Evidence from U.S.-Japan Agreements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 635-649, April.
    6. Klaus Heine & Maximilian Kerk, 2017. "Conflict resolution in meta-organizations: the peculiar role of arbitration," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Robert Grant, 2013. "Reflections on knowledge-based approaches to the organization of production," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(3), pages 541-558, August.
    8. Jack A. Nickerson & Todd R. Zenger, 2004. "A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm—The Problem-Solving Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 617-632, December.
    9. Paija, Laura, 2003. "Distribution of Intellectual Property Rights and the Development of Technology Suppliers," Discussion Papers 844, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    10. Bruce Heiman & Jack Nickerson, 2002. "Towards Reconciling Transaction Cost Economics and the Knowledge-based View of the Firm: The Context of Interfirm Collaborations," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 97-116.
    11. Paul Walker, 2010. "The (Non)Theory Of The Knowledge Firm," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 57(1), pages 1-32, February.
    12. Ya-Feng CHANG, 2017. "A critical account of intra -and inter- organizational knowledge management: Diversity, relationship making, and paradoxes," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 429-436, December.
    13. Todd Zenger, 2002. "Crafting Internal Hybrids: Complementarities, Common Change Initiatives, and the Team-Based Organization," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 79-95.
    14. Getie Andualem Imiru, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship among Export Resources, Exporting Capability & Exporter-Foreign Distributers relationship on Export Performance: In the Case of Exporting Companies in Ethiop," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-60, December.
    15. Alex Eapen & Rekha Krishnan, 2019. "Transferring Tacit Know-How: Do Opportunism Safeguards Matter for Firm Boundary Decisions?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 715-734, July.
    16. Akira Takeishi, 2002. "Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 321-338, June.
    17. Young, Greg & Sapienza, Harry & Baumer, David, 2003. "The influence of flexibility in buyer-seller relationships on the productivity of knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 443-451, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:7:y:1996:i:5:p:519-523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.