IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v16y2005i1p85-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Notes on the Evolution of a Research Community: Organization Studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000

Author

Listed:
  • Mie Augier

    (Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-3096)

  • James G. March

    (Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-3096)

  • Bilian Ni Sullivan

    (Department of Management of Organizations, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Since the Second World War, the field of organizations studies has grown substantially in the number of researchers, number of publications, and amount of research produced. It has moved from being a combination of established disciplines to becoming a quasi-discipline of its own, with its own journals and professional associations. It has established a standardized set of ancestors, a stylized history. It has solidified an academic home in business schools. This history has implications for understanding both the future of organizations research and the social dynamics of the development of scholarly communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mie Augier & James G. March & Bilian Ni Sullivan, 2005. "Notes on the Evolution of a Research Community: Organization Studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-95, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:85-95
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.1040.0108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. Daniel Kahneman & Dan Lovallo, 1993. "Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 17-31, January.
    3. James G. March, 2004. "Parochialism in the Evolution of a Research Community: The Case of Organization Studies," Management and Organization Review, International Association of Chinese Management Research, vol. 1(1), pages 5-22, June.
    4. Jerker Denrell & James G. March, 2001. "Adaptation as Information Restriction: The Hot Stove Effect," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 523-538, October.
    5. Olaf Helmer, 1958. "The Prospects of a Unified Theory of Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 172-176, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mie Augier & Michael Prietula, 2007. "Perspective---Historical Roots of the A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Model at GSIA," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 507-522, June.
    2. Corinne Bendersky & Kathleen L. McGinn, 2010. "Perspective---Open to Negotiation: Phenomenological Assumptions and Knowledge Dissemination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 781-797, June.
    3. Carl Senior & Nick Lee & Michael Butler, 2011. "PERSPECTIVE---Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 804-815, June.
    4. Anthony Hussenot & Viviane Sergi, 2018. "Collaborating Without (Formal) Organization: How Do Independent Workers Call Into Question the Matter of Organization?," Post-Print hal-01948575, HAL.
    5. Anita Williams Woolley & Erica Fuchs, 2011. "PERSPECTIVE---Collective Intelligence in the Organization of Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1359-1367, October.
    6. Augier, Mie, 2013. "The early evolution of the foundations for behavioral organization theory and strategy," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 72-81.
    7. Joel A. C. Baum, 2011. "European and North American Approaches to Organizations and Strategy Research: An Atlantic Divide? Not," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1663-1679, December.
    8. Brady D. Lund & Ting Wang & Nishith Reddy Mannuru & Bing Nie & Somipam Shimray & Ziang Wang, 2023. "ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(5), pages 570-581, May.
    9. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils & Seidl, David, 2016. "Resurrecting organization by going beyond organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 93-101.
    10. Claudia Bird Schoonhoven & Alan D. Meyer & James P. Walsh, 2005. "Moving Beyond the Frontiers of Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 453-455, October.
    11. Alain Desreumaux, 2008. "Refaire de la stratégie?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(Special), pages 67-107, June.
    12. Behlül Üsdiken, 2014. "Centres and Peripheries: Research Styles and Publication Patterns in ‘Top’ US Journals and their European Alternatives, 1960–2010," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 764-789, July.
    13. Daoud, Adel & Kohl, Sebastian, 2016. "How much do sociologists write about economic topics? Using big data to test some conventional views in economic sociology, 1890 to 2014," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    14. James P. Walsh & Alan D. Meyer & Claudia Bird Schoonhoven, 2006. "A Future for Organization Theory: Living in and Living with Changing Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(5), pages 657-671, October.
    15. Amon Barros & Scott Taylor, 2020. "Think Tanks, Business and Civil Society: The Ethics of Promoting Pro-corporate Ideologies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 505-517, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christina Fang & Jeho Lee & Melissa A. Schilling, 2010. "Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 625-642, June.
    2. Joel A. C. Baum, 2011. "European and North American Approaches to Organizations and Strategy Research: An Atlantic Divide? Not," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1663-1679, December.
    3. Marios Kokkodis, 2023. "Adjusting Skillset Cohesion in Online Labor Markets: Reputation Gains and Opportunity Losses," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1245-1258, September.
    4. Marios Kokkodis & Sam Ransbotham, 2023. "Learning to Successfully Hire in Online Labor Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1597-1614, March.
    5. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    6. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Jong Seok Lee & Mark Keil & Daniel Lunn & Dirk W. Bester, 2022. "The Empirical Reality of IT Project Cost Overruns: Discovering A Power-Law Distribution," Papers 2210.01573, arXiv.org.
    7. Hart E. Posen & Dirk Martignoni & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2013. "E Pluribus Unum: Organizational Size and the Efficacy of Learning," DRUID Working Papers 13-09, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    8. Oliver Baumann, 2015. "Models of complex adaptive systems in strategy and organization research," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 14(2), pages 169-183, November.
    9. Silvestri, Daniela & Riccaboni, Massimo & Della Malva, Antonio, 2018. "Sailing in all winds: Technological search over the business cycle," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1933-1944.
    10. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    11. Dew, Nicholas & Read, Stuart & Sarasvathy, Saras D. & Wiltbank, Robert, 2008. "Outlines of a behavioral theory of the entrepreneurial firm," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 37-59, April.
    12. Stephan Billinger & Kannan Srikanth & Nils Stieglitz & Terry R. Schumacher, 2021. "Exploration and exploitation in complex search tasks: How feedback influences whether and where human agents search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 361-385, February.
    13. Mooweon Rhee & Tohyun Kim, 2015. "Great Vessels Take a Long Time to Mature: Early Success Traps and Competences in Exploitation and Exploration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 180-197, February.
    14. Bastien Soulé & Julie Hallé & Eric Boutroy & Bénédicte Vignal, 2023. "Revisiting innovation: the organizational vulnerability of small or medium companies innovating in the outdoor sports sector," Working Papers hal-03360833, HAL.
    15. Sunkee Lee, 2019. "Learning-by-Moving: Can Reconfiguring Spatial Proximity Between Organizational Members Promote Individual-level Exploration?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 467-488, May.
    16. Steve J. Bickley & Alison Macintyre & Benno Torgler, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Sustainable Entrepreneurship," CREMA Working Paper Series 2021-11, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    17. repec:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:6:p:553-562 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mie Augier & James G. March & Andrew W. Marshall, 2015. "Perspective—The Flaring of Intellectual Outliers: An Organizational Interpretation of the Generation of Novelty in the RAND Corporation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1140-1161, August.
    19. Zhong, Xi & Chen, Weihong & Ren, Ge, 2022. "The effects of performance shortfalls on firms’ exploitation and exploration R&D internationalization decisions: Does industry environmental matter?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. James H. Moore & Matthew S. Kraatz, 2011. "Governance Form and Organizational Adaptation: Lessons from the Savings and Loan Industry in the 1980s," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 850-868, August.
    21. Daniella Laureiro-Martínez & Stefano Brusoni & Nicola Canessa & Maurizio Zollo, 2015. "Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 319-338, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:85-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.