IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v48y2000i6p858-865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-Cost Trade-Offs in Overlapped Product Development

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas A. Roemer

    (The Anderson School of Management, University of California at Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza/Box 951481, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

  • Reza Ahmadi

    (The Anderson School of Management, University of California at Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza/Box 951481, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

  • Robert H. Wang

    (The Anderson School of Management, University of California at Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza/Box 951481, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

Abstract

Increasingly shorter product life cycles impel firms to design, develop, and market more products in less time than ever before. Overlapping of design and development stages is commonly regarded as the most promising strategy to reduce product development times. However, overlapping typically requires additional resources and can be costly.Our research addresses the trade-off between product development time and costs and introduces an algorithm to determine an appropriate overlapping strategy under different scenarios. The methodology developed was successfully employed at Rocketdyne Division of Rockwell International.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas A. Roemer & Reza Ahmadi & Robert H. Wang, 2000. "Time-Cost Trade-Offs in Overlapped Product Development," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 858-865, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:6:p:858-865
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.6.858.12396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.48.6.858.12396
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.48.6.858.12396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert P. Smith & Steven D. Eppinger, 1997. "A Predictive Model of Sequential Iteration in Engineering Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(8), pages 1104-1120, August.
    2. Albert Y. Ha & Evan L. Porteus, 1995. "Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(9), pages 1431-1447, September.
    3. D. R. Fulkerson, 1961. "A Network Flow Computation for Project Cost Curves," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 167-178, January.
    4. Reza Ahmadi & Robert H. Wang, 1999. "Managing Development Risk in Product Design Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 235-246, April.
    5. Kanda, Arun & Rao, U. R. K., 1984. "A network flow procedure for project crashing with penalty nodes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 174-182, May.
    6. Viswanathan Krishnan & Steven D. Eppinger & Daniel E. Whitney, 1997. "A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 437-451, April.
    7. Foldes, Stephan & Soumis, Francois, 1993. "PERT and crashing revisited: Mathematical generalizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 286-294, January.
    8. James E. Kelley, 1961. "Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling: Mathematical Basis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 296-320, June.
    9. E. B. Berman, 1964. "Resource Allocation in a PERT Network Under Continuous Activity Time-Cost Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 734-745, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Foad Iravani & Sriram Dasu & Reza Ahmadi, 2012. "A Hierarchical Framework for Organizing a Software Development Process," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1310-1322, December.
    2. Morvarid Rahmani & Guillaume Roels & Uday S. Karmarkar, 2017. "Collaborative Work Dynamics in Projects with Co‐Production," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 686-703, April.
    3. Bernardo A. Huberman & Dennis M. Wilkinson, 2010. "Fluctuating Efforts and Interdependencies in Collaborative Work," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 169-191, March.
    4. Thomas A. Roemer & Reza Ahmadi, 2004. "Concurrent Crashing and Overlapping in Product Development," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 606-622, August.
    5. Christian Terwiesch & Z. Justin Ren & Teck H. Ho & Morris A. Cohen, 2005. "An Empirical Analysis of Forecast Sharing in the Semiconductor Equipment Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 208-220, February.
    6. Qian, Yanjun & Xie, Min & Goh, Thong Ngee & Lin, Jun, 2010. "Optimal testing strategies in overlapped design process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 131-143, October.
    7. Nelson, Richard Graham & Azaron, Amir & Aref, Samin, 2016. "The use of a GERT based method to model concurrent product development processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 566-578.
    8. Rauniar, Rupak & Doll, William & Rawski, Greg & Hong, Paul, 2008. "Shared knowledge and product design glitches in integrated product development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 723-736, August.
    9. Bernardo A. Huberman & Dennis M. Wilkinson, 2005. "Performance Variability and Project Dynamics," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 307-332, December.
    10. Yassine, Ali A. & Sreenivas, Ramavarapu S. & Zhu, Jian, 2008. "Managing the exchange of information in product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 311-326, January.
    11. Antonio J. Conejo & Nicholas G. Hall & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Runhao Zhang, 2021. "Robust Capacity Planning for Project Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1533-1550, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas A. Roemer & Reza Ahmadi, 2004. "Concurrent Crashing and Overlapping in Product Development," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 606-622, August.
    2. Nitindra R. Joglekar & Ali A. Yassine & Steven D. Eppinger & Daniel E. Whitney, 2001. "Performance of Coupled Product Development Activities with a Deadline," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1605-1620, December.
    3. R L Bregman, 2009. "Preemptive expediting to improve project due date performance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 120-129, January.
    4. Bregman, Robert L., 2009. "A heuristic procedure for solving the dynamic probabilistic project expediting problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 125-137, January.
    5. Joglekar, Nitindra R., 2003. "Performance of coupled product development activities with a deadline," Working papers WP 4122-00., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Qian, Yanjun & Xie, Min & Goh, Thong Ngee & Lin, Jun, 2010. "Optimal testing strategies in overlapped design process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 131-143, October.
    7. V. Krishnan & Karl T. Ulrich, 2001. "Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    9. Morvarid Rahmani & Guillaume Roels & Uday S. Karmarkar, 2017. "Collaborative Work Dynamics in Projects with Co‐Production," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 686-703, April.
    10. Marcin Anholcer & Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2011. "Efficiency analysis of the Kaufmann and Dezbazeille algorithm for the deadline problem," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 21(1), pages 5-18.
    11. Choi, Byung-Cheon & Park, Myoung-Ju, 2015. "A continuous time–cost tradeoff problem with multiple milestones and completely ordered jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 748-752.
    12. Byung-Cheon Choi & Changmuk Kang, 2019. "A linear time–cost tradeoff problem with multiple milestones under a comb graph," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 341-361, August.
    13. Christian Terwiesch & Christoph H. Loch, 1999. "Measuring the Effectiveness of Overlapping Development Activities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 455-465, April.
    14. Aditya U. Kulkarni & Alejandro Salado & Peng Xu & Christian Wernz, 2021. "An evaluation of the optimality of frequent verification for vertically integrated systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 17-33, January.
    15. A B Hafızoğlu & M Azizoğlu, 2010. "Linear programming based approaches for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(4), pages 676-685, April.
    16. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2004. "The construction of stable project baseline schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 550-565, August.
    17. Stefan Thomke & David E. Bell, 2001. "Sequential Testing in Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 308-323, February.
    18. Lin, Jun & Qian, Yanjun & Cui, Wentian & Goh, Thong Ngee, 2015. "An effective approach for scheduling coupled activities in development projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 97-108.
    19. Atif Açıkgöz & Irem Demirkan & Gary P. Latham & Cemil Kuzey, 2021. "The Relationship Between Unlearning and Innovation Ambidexterity with the Performance of New Product Development Teams," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 945-982, August.
    20. Thomke, Stefan H., 1998. "Simulation, learning and R&D performance: Evidence from automotive development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 55-74, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:6:p:858-865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.