IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v15y2013i3p378-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fixed vs. Random Proportions Demand Models for the Assortment Planning Problem Under Stockout-Based Substitution

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothée Honhon

    (Operations Planning Accounting and Control, School of Industrial Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Sridhar Seshadri

    (Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

We consider the problem of determining the optimal assortment of products to offer in a given product category when each customer is characterized by a type, which is a list of products he is willing to buy in decreasing order of preference. We assume consumer-driven, dynamic, stockout-based substitution and random proportions of each type. No efficient method to obtain the optimal solution for this problem is known to our knowledge. However, if the number of customers of each type is a fixed proportion of demand, there exists an efficient algorithm for solving for the optimal assortment. We show that the fixed proportions model gives an upper bound to the optimal expected profit for the random proportions model. This bound allows us to obtain a measure of the absolute performance of heuristic solutions. We also provide a bound for the component-wise absolute difference in expected sales between the two models, which is asymptotically tight as the inventory vector is made large, while keeping the number of products fixed. This result provides us with a lower bound to the optimal expected profit and a performance guarantee for the fixed proportions solution in the random proportions model.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothée Honhon & Sridhar Seshadri, 2013. "Fixed vs. Random Proportions Demand Models for the Assortment Planning Problem Under Stockout-Based Substitution," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 378-386, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:15:y:2013:i:3:p:378-386
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.1120.0425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.1120.0425
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.1120.0425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David W. Pentico, 1974. "The Assortment Problem with Probabilistic Demands," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 286-290, November.
    2. Garrett van Ryzin & Siddharth Mahajan, 1999. "On the Relationship Between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in Retail Assortments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1496-1509, November.
    3. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2008. "A Static Approximation for Dynamic Demand Substitution with Applications in a Competitive Market," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 630-645, June.
    4. Stephen A. Smith & Narendra Agrawal, 2000. "Management of Multi-Item Retail Inventory Systems with Demand Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 50-64, February.
    5. Serguei Netessine & Nils Rudi, 2003. "Centralized and Competitive Inventory Models with Demand Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 329-335, April.
    6. Siddharth Mahajan & Garrett van Ryzin, 2001. "Stocking Retail Assortments Under Dynamic Consumer Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 334-351, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaodan Pan & Martin Dresner & Benny Mantin & Jun A. Zhang, 2020. "Pre‐Hurricane Consumer Stockpiling and Post‐Hurricane Product Availability: Empirical Evidence from Natural Experiments," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(10), pages 2350-2380, October.
    2. Transchel, Sandra & Buisman, Marjolein E. & Haijema, Rene, 2022. "Joint assortment and inventory optimization for vertically differentiated products under consumer-driven substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 163-179.
    3. Xiangyu Gao & Huanan Zhang, 2022. "An efficient learning framework for multiproduct inventory systems with customer choices," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2492-2516, June.
    4. Yalçın Akçay & Yunke Li & Harihara Prasad Natarajan, 2020. "Category Inventory Planning With Service Level Requirements and Dynamic Substitutions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(11), pages 2553-2578, November.
    5. Shin, Hojung & Park, Soohoon & Lee, Euncheol & Benton, W.C., 2015. "A classification of the literature on the planning of substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 686-699.
    6. Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz & Sumit Kunnumkal, 2022. "A Model for Integrated Inventory and Assortment Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5049-5067, July.
    7. Lena Riesenegger & Alexander Hübner, 2022. "Reducing Food Waste at Retail Stores—An Explorative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Amr Farahat & Joonkyum Lee, 2018. "The Multiproduct Newsvendor Problem with Customer Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 123-136, January.
    9. Pol Boada-Collado & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2020. "Estimating and Optimizing the Impact of Inventory on Consumer Choices in a Fashion Retail Setting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 582-597, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shin, Hojung & Park, Soohoon & Lee, Euncheol & Benton, W.C., 2015. "A classification of the literature on the planning of substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 686-699.
    2. Dorothée Honhon & Vishal Gaur & Sridhar Seshadri, 2010. "Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions Under Stockout-Based Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1364-1379, October.
    3. Vashkar Ghosh & Anand Paul & Lingjiong Zhu, 2022. "Stocking Under Random Demand and Product Variety: Exact Models and Heuristics," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1006-1032, March.
    4. Yu, Yimin & Shou, Biying & Ni, Yaodong & Chen, Li, 2017. "Optimal production, pricing, and substitution policies in continuous review production-inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 631-649.
    5. Transchel, Sandra, 2017. "Inventory management under price-based and stockout-based substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 996-1008.
    6. Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz & Sumit Kunnumkal, 2022. "A Model for Integrated Inventory and Assortment Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5049-5067, July.
    7. Hübner, Alexander H. & Kuhn, Heinrich, 2012. "Retail category management: State-of-the-art review of quantitative research and software applications in assortment and shelf space management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 199-209, April.
    8. Vineet Goyal & Retsef Levi & Danny Segev, 2016. "Near-Optimal Algorithms for the Assortment Planning Problem Under Dynamic Substitution and Stochastic Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 219-235, February.
    9. Yücel, Eda & Karaesmen, Fikri & Salman, F. Sibel & Türkay, Metin, 2009. "Optimizing product assortment under customer-driven demand substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 759-768, December.
    10. Narendra Agrawal & Stephen A. Smith, 2003. "Optimal retail assortments for substitutable items purchased in sets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(7), pages 793-822, October.
    11. Mou, Shandong & Robb, David J. & DeHoratius, Nicole, 2018. "Retail store operations: Literature review and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 399-422.
    12. Lingxiu Dong & Panos Kouvelis & Zhongjun Tian, 2009. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Control of Substitute Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 317-339, December.
    13. Pol Boada-Collado & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2020. "Estimating and Optimizing the Impact of Inventory on Consumer Choices in a Fashion Retail Setting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 582-597, May.
    14. Zhang, Ren-Qian & Zhang, Lan-Kang & Zhou, Wen-Hui & Saigal, Romesh & Wang, Hui-Wen, 2014. "The multi-item newsvendor model with cross-selling and the solution when demand is jointly normally distributed," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 147-159.
    15. Tan, Baris & Karabati, Selcuk, 2013. "Retail inventory management with stock-out based dynamic demand substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 78-87.
    16. Yalçın Akçay & Yunke Li & Harihara Prasad Natarajan, 2020. "Category Inventory Planning With Service Level Requirements and Dynamic Substitutions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(11), pages 2553-2578, November.
    17. Bacel Maddah & Ebru K. Bish, 2007. "Joint pricing, assortment, and inventory decisions for a retailer's product line," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 315-330, April.
    18. Fernando Bernstein & A. Gürhan Kök & Lei Xie, 2015. "Dynamic Assortment Customization with Limited Inventories," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 538-553, October.
    19. Zhang, Juliang & Deng, Lan & Liu, Huimin & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Which strategy is better for managing multi-product demand uncertainty: Inventory substitution or probabilistic selling?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 79-95.
    20. A. Gürhan Kök & Marshall L. Fisher, 2007. "Demand Estimation and Assortment Optimization Under Substitution: Methodology and Application," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1001-1021, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:15:y:2013:i:3:p:378-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.