IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v47y2001i7p915-930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Pricing That Coordinates Queues with Customer-Chosen Service Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Y. Ha

    (Yale School of Management, Yale University, 135 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06511-3729)

Abstract

This article considers the problem of coordinating the admission rates and service requirements of a multiclass queue when these decisions are made on a decentralized basis. The customer classes are characterized by different demand patterns, delay costs, and service costs. Customers make individual decisions on whether to join the queue and, if so, their service requirements. Their class identities and service requirements are private information not known to the system manager. We develop a two-stage decision framework to analyze the problem and characterize the optimal admission rates and service requirements under both centralized and decentralized assumptions. We distinguish admission and service externality costs that lead to suboptimal performance under decentralized control. For a given service discipline, we derive optimal class-specific pricing schemes that can coordinate the system when only service requirements but not class identities are unobservable. When customer class identities are also unobservable, we consider two common service disciplines that offer undifferentiated service: processor sharing and first-come-first-served. Based on the general framework, for the M/G/s processor sharing queue, we show that a single variable fee (payment per unit of time in the system) can induce the optimal admission rates and service requirements for all customer classes. For the M/G/1 first-come-first-served queue, we show that a single pricing scheme that is quadratic in time in service can induce the optimal admission rates and service requirements for all customer classes. Our result demonstrates that, under suitable conditions, simple and undifferentiated pricing can coordinate complex queueing systems with heterogeneous customer classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Y. Ha, 2001. "Optimal Pricing That Coordinates Queues with Customer-Chosen Service Requirements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(7), pages 915-930, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:47:y:2001:i:7:p:915-930
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.47.7.915.9806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.7.915.9806
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.47.7.915.9806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven A. Lippman & Shaler Stidham, 1977. "Individual versus Social Optimization in Exponential Congestion Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 233-247, April.
    2. Albert Y. Ha, 1998. "Incentive-Compatible Pricing for a Service Facility with Joint Production and Congestion Externalities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-1), pages 1623-1636, December.
    3. Colin E. Bell & Shaler Stidham, Jr., 1983. "Individual versus Social Optimization in the Allocation of Customers to Alternative Servers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(7), pages 831-839, July.
    4. Eitan Altman & Nahum Shimkin, 1998. "Individual Equilibrium and Learning in Processor Sharing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 776-784, December.
    5. S. Rao & E. R. Petersen, 1998. "Optimal Pricing of Priority Services," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 46-56, February.
    6. David Assaf & Moshe Haviv, 1990. "Reneging from Processor Sharing Systems and Random Queues," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 129-138, February.
    7. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2000. "Price and Service Discrimination in Queuing Systems: Incentive Compatibility of Gc\mu Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1249-1267, September.
    8. Moshe Haviv & Ya'acov Ritov, 1998. "Externalities, Tangible Externalities, and Queue Disciplines," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 850-858, June.
    9. Rafael Hassin, 1995. "Decentralized Regulation of a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 163-173, January.
    10. Bradford, Richard M., 1996. "Pricing, routing, and incentive compatibility in multiserver queues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 226-236, March.
    11. Phillip J. Lederer & Lode Li, 1997. "Pricing, Production, Scheduling, and Delivery-Time Competition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 407-420, June.
    12. Hau Leung Lee & Morris A. Cohen, 1985. "Multi-Agent Customer Allocation in a Stochastic Service System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 752-763, June.
    13. Lui, Francis T, 1985. "An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 93(4), pages 760-781, August.
    14. Knudsen, Niels Chr, 1972. "Individual and Social Optimization in a Multiserver Queue with a General Cost-Benefit Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 40(3), pages 515-528, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philipp Afèche & Haim Mendelson, 2004. "Pricing and Priority Auctions in Queueing Systems with a Generalized Delay Cost Structure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 869-882, July.
    2. Philipp Afèche & Opher Baron & Yoav Kerner, 2013. "Pricing Time-Sensitive Services Based on Realized Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 492-506, July.
    3. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jan A. Van Mieghem & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Incentives for Quality Through Endogenous Routing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 254-273, July.
    4. Roland T. Rust & Tuck Siong Chung, 2006. "Marketing Models of Service and Relationships," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 560-580, 11-12.
    5. Vernon N. Hsu & Susan H. Xu & Boris Jukic, 2009. "Optimal Scheduling and Incentive Compatible Pricing for a Service System with Quality of Service Guarantees," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 375-396, May.
    6. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jan A. Van Mieghem & R. Canan Savaskan, 2006. "Incentives for Quality through Endogenous Routing," Discussion Papers 1436, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    7. I. Robert Chiang & Jhih‐Hua Jhang‐Li, 2020. "Competition through Exclusivity in Digital Content Distribution," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1270-1286, May.
    8. Pavlin, J. Michael, 2017. "Dual bounds of a service level assignment problem with applications to efficient pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 239-250.
    9. Doǧan A. Serel & Erdal Erel, 2008. "Coordination of staffing and pricing decisions in a service firm," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 307-323, July.
    10. Yezekael Hayel & Mohamed Ouarraou & Bruno Tuffin, 2007. "Optimal Measurement-based Pricing for an M/M/1 Queue," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 177-195, June.
    11. Pnina Feldman & Ella Segev, 2022. "The Important Role of Time Limits When Consumers Choose Their Time in Service," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6666-6686, September.
    12. Chen-An Lin & Kevin Shang & Peng Sun, 2023. "Wait Time–Based Pricing for Queues with Customer-Chosen Service Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2127-2146, April.
    13. Wedad Elmaghraby & P{i}nar Keskinocak, 2003. "Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Inventory Considerations: Research Overview, Current Practices, and Future Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1287-1309, October.
    14. Chernonog, Tatyana & Avinadav, Tal, 2019. "Pricing and advertising in a supply chain of perishable products under asymmetric information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 249-264.
    15. Olga Bountali & Apostolos Burnetas & Lerzan Örmeci, 2022. "Join, balk, or jettison? The effect of flexibility and ranking knowledge in systems with batch arrivals," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3505-3524, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philipp Afèche & Haim Mendelson, 2004. "Pricing and Priority Auctions in Queueing Systems with a Generalized Delay Cost Structure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 869-882, July.
    2. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2000. "Price and Service Discrimination in Queuing Systems: Incentive Compatibility of Gc\mu Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1249-1267, September.
    3. Albert Y. Ha, 1998. "Incentive-Compatible Pricing for a Service Facility with Joint Production and Congestion Externalities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-1), pages 1623-1636, December.
    4. Vernon N. Hsu & Susan H. Xu & Boris Jukic, 2009. "Optimal Scheduling and Incentive Compatible Pricing for a Service System with Quality of Service Guarantees," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 375-396, May.
    5. Y Perlman & M Kaspi, 2007. "Centralized decision of internal transfer-prices with congestion externalities for two modes of repair with limited repair capacity," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(9), pages 1178-1184, September.
    6. Grossman, Thomas A. & Brandeau, Margaret L., 2002. "Optimal pricing for service facilities with self-optimizing customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 39-57, August.
    7. Gérard P. Cachon & Patrick T. Harker, 2002. "Competition and Outsourcing with Scale Economies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1314-1333, October.
    8. Xuanming Su & Stefanos Zenios, 2004. "Patient Choice in Kidney Allocation: The Role of the Queueing Discipline," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 280-301, June.
    9. Philipp Afèche & Opher Baron & Joseph Milner & Ricky Roet-Green, 2019. "Pricing and Prioritizing Time-Sensitive Customers with Heterogeneous Demand Rates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1184-1208, July.
    10. S. Rao & E. R. Petersen, 1998. "Optimal Pricing of Priority Services," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 46-56, February.
    11. Ali K. Parlaktürk & Sunil Kumar, 2004. "Self-Interested Routing in Queueing Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 949-966, July.
    12. Tingliang Huang & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo, 2013. "Bounded Rationality in Service Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 263-279, May.
    13. Anthony M. Kwasnica & Euthemia Stavrulaki, 2008. "Competitive location and capacity decisions for firms serving time‐sensitive customers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 704-721, October.
    14. Knight, Vincent A. & Harper, Paul R., 2013. "Selfish routing in public services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 122-132.
    15. Bradford, Richard M., 1996. "Pricing, routing, and incentive compatibility in multiserver queues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 226-236, March.
    16. Mei Xue & Patrick T. Harker, 2003. "Service Co-Production, Customer Efficiency and Market Competition," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 03-03, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    17. Refael Hassin & Ran I. Snitkovsky, 2020. "Social and Monopoly Optimization in Observable Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1178-1198, July.
    18. Aktaran-KalaycI, Tûba & Ayhan, Hayriye, 2009. "Sensitivity of optimal prices to system parameters in a steady-state service facility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 120-128, February.
    19. Erica L. Plambeck, 2004. "Optimal Leadtime Differentiation via Diffusion Approximations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 213-228, April.
    20. Philipp Afèche, 2013. "Incentive-Compatible Revenue Management in Queueing Systems: Optimal Strategic Delay," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 423-443, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:47:y:2001:i:7:p:915-930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.