Remarks on: "Some Extensions of the Discrete Lotsizing and Scheduling Problem"
AbstractComputational complexity results provide guideposts toward fruitful directions in algorithmic research and therefore play an important role in research on algorithm design. This note discusses complexity analysis in the context of lotsizing and scheduling problems. Such discussion is warranted for three reasons. First, research on problems that combine lotsizing and scheduling is growing rapidly. Second, these problems have the potential for requiring much less information to represent an instance than to represent a candidate solution. As a consequence, analysis may depend critically on subtle considerations relating to instance and solution size. Third, as we will see below, there is some evidence that the literature is unclear on this point.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by INFORMS in its journal Management Science.
Volume (Year): 45 (1999)
Issue (Month): 5 (May)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Bruggemann, Wolfgang & Jahnke, Hermann, 2000. "The discrete lot-sizing and scheduling problem: Complexity and modification for batch availability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 511-528, August.
- Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.