IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v35y1989i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Airline Safety: The Last Decade

Author

Listed:
  • Arnold Barnett

    (Sloan School of Management, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Mary K. Higgins

    (Air Force Center for Studies and Analyses, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20330)

Abstract

The paper presents safety data for the period 1977--86 from more than 30 U.S. domestic airlines and 80 international flag carriers. These statistics are examined in conjunction with others from an earlier MIT study about the previous two decades. The primary safety measure used is "death risk per flight," which weights each fatal accident by the proportion of passengers killed and exploits statistical evidence that the risk arising from a nonstop flight is uncorrelated with its route length. The main conclusions of the analysis are: (1) The U.S. domestic trunklines can continue to lay claim to being the safest group of airlines in the world. In 1977--86, the death risk per flight on these carriers was roughly one in eleven million. This represents a factor-of-four improvement since the early 1970's and a factor-of-ten improvement since the early 1960's. (2) But while U.S. jet travel has become safer in recent years, the improvement would probably have been greater still in the absence of airline deregulation. The reason for this assessment relates to the new jet carriers spawned by deregulation. Most such carriers have perfect safety records so far but, collectively, the recent entrants averaged twelve times the death risk per flight in 1979--86 of the established trunklines. This statistically significant excess cut by nearly one-half the recent progress in domestic jet safety. (3) International air travel was also far safer in the last decade than in preceding ones. But the flag carriers of Communist bloc and Third-World nations averaged eight times the death risk per flight as those from industrialized First-World nations. This factor-of-eight discrepancy, which has persisted with little change throughout the last quarter century, cannot be explained by differences in route structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnold Barnett & Mary K. Higgins, 1989. "Airline Safety: The Last Decade," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:35:y:1989:i:1:p:1-21
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.1.1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.35.1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnold Barnett, 1991. "It's Safer to Fly," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 13-14, March.
    2. Fulton, Neale L. & Westcott, Mark & Emery, Stephen, 2009. "Decision support for risk assessment of mid-air collisions via population-based measures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 150-169, February.
    3. Arnold Barnett, 1999. "A "Parallel Approach" Path to Estimating Collision Risk During Simultaneous Landings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 382-394, March.
    4. Raghavan, Sunder & Rhoades, Dawna L., 2005. "Revisiting the relationship between profitability and air carrier safety in the US airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 283-290.
    5. Leonard Evans & Michael C. Frick & Richard C. Schwing, 1991. "Response to Barnett," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 17-17, March.
    6. Landry, Steven J. & Lagu, Amit & Kinnari, Jouko, 2010. "State-based modeling of continuous human-integrated systems: An application to air traffic separation assurance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 345-353.
    7. Leonard Evans & Michael C. Frick & Richard C. Schwing, 1990. "Is It Safer to Fly or Drive?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 239-246, June.
    8. Gregory Noronha & Vijay Singal, 2004. "Financial health and airline safety," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 1-16.
    9. Oster, Clinton V. & Strong, John S. & Zorn, C. Kurt, 2013. "Analyzing aviation safety: Problems, challenges, opportunities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 148-164.
    10. Huseyin Cavusoglu & Byungwan Koh & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2010. "An Analysis of the Impact of Passenger Profiling for Transportation Security," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1287-1302, October.
    11. Kwabena Asomanin Anaman & Ruth Quaye & Bernice Owusu-Brown, 2017. "Benefits of Aviation Weather Services: A Review of International Literature," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(1), pages 45-58, June.
    12. Peter M. Madsen & Vinit Desai, 2018. "No Firm Is an Island: The Role of Population-Level Actors in Organizational Learning from Failure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 739-753, August.
    13. Huseyin Cavusoglu & Young Kwark & Bin Mai & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2013. "Passenger Profiling and Screening for Aviation Security in the Presence of Strategic Attackers," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 63-81, March.
    14. Rhoades, Dawna L & Waguespack, Blaise, 2000. "Judging a book by it's cover: the relationship between service and safety quality in US national and regional airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 87-94.
    15. Nancy L. Rose, 1992. "Fear of Flying? Economic Analysis of Airline Safety," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 75-94, Spring.
    16. McFadden, Kathleen L & Towell, Elizabeth R, 1999. "Aviation human factors: a framework for the new millennium," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 177-184.
    17. Laura A. McLay & Sheldon H. Jacobson & John E. Kobza, 2006. "A multilevel passenger screening problem for aviation security," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 183-197, April.
    18. Arnold Barnett, 2010. "Cross-National Differences in Aviation Safety Records," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 322-332, August.
    19. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2004. "A new airline safety index," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 369-383, May.
    20. Alexander G. Nikolaev & Sheldon H. Jacobson & Laura A. McLay, 2007. "A Sequential Stochastic Security System Design Problem for Aviation Security," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 182-194, May.
    21. Peck, Milo W. & Scheraga, Carl A. & Boisjoly, Russell P., 1998. "Assessing the relative efficiency of aircraft maintenance technologies: an application of data envelopment analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 261-269, May.
    22. Robin L. Dillon & Blake E. Johnson & M. Elisabeth Patè‐Cornell, 1999. "Risk Assessment Based on Financial Data: Market Response to Airline Accidents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 473-486, June.
    23. Haunschild, Pamela & Ni, Bilian, 2000. "Learning from Complexity: Effects of Accident/Incident Heterogenity on Airline Learning," Research Papers 1621, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    24. David Czerwinski & Arnold Barnett, 2006. "Airlines as Baseball Players: Another Approach for Evaluating an Equal-Safety Hypothesis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(9), pages 1291-1300, September.
    25. Oster, Jr., Clinton V. & Strong, John S., 1991. "Risk Tiers and Safety Mismatches in International Aviation," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 32(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:35:y:1989:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.