IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v41y2022i6p1029-1044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontiers: How Support for Black Lives Matter Impacts Consumer Responses on Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Wang

    (Marketing, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

  • Marco Shaojun Qin

    (Marketing, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

  • Xueming Luo

    (Marketing, Strategy, and Management Information System, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

  • Yu (Eric) Kou

    (Marketing, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

Abstract

We scrutinize the direct and moderated impact of brands’ support for Black Lives Matter (BLM) on consumer responses. Our empirical strategy exploits Blackout Tuesday as a natural experiment in which BLM support occurred on Instagram (treated platform) but not on Twitter (control platform) to perform a within-brand crossplatform difference-in-differences (DID) analysis. We also combine econometric models with machine learning techniques to analyze the unstructured data of the social media content. Based on a unique multiindustry, multiyear, and multiplatform data set of 435 major brands and 396,988 social media posts, we find a negative impact of BLM support on consumer responses, such as followers and likes. Furthermore, our analyses uncover a multifaceted set of heterogeneous DID effects across brands. (1) Although lone-wolf BLM support leads to negligible effects, large-scale BLM support from many brands can lead to strong negative effects (i.e., the bandwagon effect). (2) Posting self-promotional content exacerbates the negative effects of BLM support. (3) Historical prosocial posting on social media attenuates the negative effects. (4) Brands with socially oriented missions suffer less from the negative effects. (5) Customers’ political affiliation also matters; the negative effects of BLM support are amplified/attenuated for brands with mostly Republican/Democratic customers. Additionally, (6) slacktivism (showing BLM support in words but without financial donations) can mitigate the negative effects for brands with mostly Republican consumers but amplify the negative effects for brands with mostly Democratic consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Wang & Marco Shaojun Qin & Xueming Luo & Yu (Eric) Kou, 2022. "Frontiers: How Support for Black Lives Matter Impacts Consumer Responses on Social Media," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1029-1044, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:41:y:2022:i:6:p:1029-1044
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2022.1372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1372
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2022.1372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sourjo Mukherjee & Niek Althuizen, 2020. "Brand Activism: Does Courting Controversy Help or Hurt a Brand?," Post-Print hal-03095886, HAL.
    2. James J. Cordeiro & Joseph Sarkis, 1997. "Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 104-114, May.
    3. Mukherjee, Sourjo & Althuizen, Niek, 2020. "Brand activism: Does courting controversy help or hurt a brand?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 772-788.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Duffek & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Omar Merlo, 2023. "Why so toxic? A framework for exploring customer toxicity," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 122-143, June.
    2. Michel, Géraldine & Stathopoulou, Anastasia & Valette-Florence, Pierre, 2022. "Luxury is still alive and well: A spotlight on its multifaceted components," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 276-284.
    3. Khalid Alharbi & Joon Kyoung Kim & Christopher Noland & Jackson Carter, 2022. "When Corporate Social Advocacy Meets Controversial Celebrity: The Role of Consumer–Brand Congruence and Consumer-Celebrity Congruence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Steven Chen, 2023. "A counterinsurgent (COIN) framework to defend against consumer activists," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(4), pages 275-301, July.
    5. Lembregts, Christophe & Cadario, Romain, 2024. "Consumer-Driven Climate Mitigation: Exploring Barriers and Solutions in Studying Higher Mitigation Potential Behaviors," OSF Preprints ywus6, Center for Open Science.
    6. Sergio Rivaroli & Roberta Spadoni & Ilenia Bregoli, 2022. "What Grounds Our Loyalty towards “Authentic Brand Activism” of a Sustainable Food Brand?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Ahmad, Fayez & Guzmán, Francisco & Kidwell, Blair, 2022. "Effective messaging strategies to increase brand love for sociopolitical activist brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 609-622.
    8. Cavdar Aksoy, Nilsah & Yazici, Nihal, 2023. "Does justice affect brand advocacy? Online brand advocacy behaviors as a response to hotel customers’ justice perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    9. Maximilian Schacker, 2022. "Tackling Fuzziness in CSR Communication Research on Social Media: Pathways to More Rigor and Replicability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Mirzaei, Abas & Wilkie, Dean C. & Siuki, Helen, 2022. "Woke brand activism authenticity or the lack of it," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Villagra, Nuria & Monfort, Abel & Méndez-Suárez, Mariano, 2021. "Firm value impact of corporate activism: Facebook and the stop hate for profit campaign," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 319-326.
    12. Wong, Amy & Wei, Joicey, 2023. "Persuasive cues and reciprocal behaviors in influencer-follower relationships: The mediating role of influencer defense," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Carina Thürridl & Frauke Mattison Thompson, 2023. "Making brand activism successful: How advice-giving can boost support behavior and reap benefits for the brand," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 685-696, December.
    14. Lunardo, Renaud & Alemany Oliver, Mathieu & Shepherd, Steven, 2023. "How believing in brand conspiracies shapes relationships with brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Rayenda Khresna Brahmana & Maria Kontesa, 2021. "Does clean technology weaken the environmental impact on the financial performance? Insight from global oil and gas companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3411-3423, November.
    16. Julie Dekker & Tim Hasso, 2016. "Environmental Performance Focus in Private Family Firms: The Role of Social Embeddedness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 293-309, June.
    17. Stefan Ambec & Paul Lanoie, 2007. "When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green?," CIRANO Working Papers 2007s-20, CIRANO.
    18. Dyna Seng & Chaiporn Vithessonthi, 2017. "Environmental Efforts and Firm Performance," PIER Discussion Papers 64, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Marta Arbelo-Pérez & Yaiza Armas-Cruz & Antonio Arbelo, 2022. "Environmental strategy and firm performance: A new methodological proposal," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(8), pages 283-292.
    20. V. Veeravel & E. K. S. Sadharma & Bandi Kamaiah, 2024. "Do ESG disclosures lead to superior firm performance? A method of moments panel quantile regression approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 741-754, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:41:y:2022:i:6:p:1029-1044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.