IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v15y1996i2p192-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Package Coupons on Brand Choice: An Epilogue on Profits

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay K. Dhar

    (University of Chicago)

  • Donald G. Morrison

    (University of California at Los Angeles)

  • Jagmohan S. Raju

    (University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

In Raju, Dhar, and Morrison (1994), a paper that appeared earlier in this journal, we developed an analytical model and conducted empirical analyses to examine the effect of package coupons on market share. In this epilogue, we extend the analytical framework in our earlier paper to study the relative impact of package coupons on profits. We also report findings from five quasi-experiments (including two new quasi-experiments) that provide empirical validity to our model-based predictions. Our results have significance for brand managers in packaged goods firms. Our analysis suggest that while selecting among package coupons, brand managers should carefully define which performance criterion to use: market share impact, redemption rate, or profit impact. Package coupons that lead to the highest market share impact (or redemptions) may not lead to the highest profit impact. We compare the relative profit impact of the following package coupons: peel-off, on-pack, and in-pack. coupons must be redeemed on the same purchase occasion on which they are obtained. coupons are obtained at one purchase occasion but can only be redeemed for a discount on the couponed brand at a future purchase occasion. coupons are similar to on-pack coupons except that the consumer is aware of the presence of these coupons when the product is purchased (in-pack coupons are printed or placed inside the package). Consumers with an in-pack or on-pack coupon from a previous purchase occasion will have a higher probability of purchasing the couponed brand even if the brand was not currently offering coupons. Consequently, to understand choice behavior, it is not enough to take into consideration the current choice environment; our model therefore must also keep track of whether or not a consumer has a package coupon that was obtained on an earlier purchase occasion. In other words, since choice is dependent on the purchase environment as well as the state of the consumer, we use a Markov model to represent the choice process. Analytical results are derived based on the long run probabilities of the Markov transition matrix. Our analytical and empirical results suggest that by and large, of the various package coupons examined in our research, on-pack coupons lead to the highest impact on profits. Furthermore, while peel-offs lead to a higher market share than in-packs, because in-packs stimulate repurchase among previous buyers, they lead to higher profits than peel-offs; though only for stronger brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay K. Dhar & Donald G. Morrison & Jagmohan S. Raju, 1996. "The Effect of Package Coupons on Brand Choice: An Epilogue on Profits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 192-203.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:15:y:1996:i:2:p:192-203
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.15.2.192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.15.2.192
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.15.2.192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khouja, Moutaz & Rajagopalan, Hari K. & Zhou, Jing, 2013. "Analysis of the effectiveness of manufacturer-sponsored retailer gift cards in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 333-347.
    2. Mengze Shi, 2013. "A theoretical analysis of endogenous and exogenous switching costs," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 205-230, June.
    3. Geoffrey Fisher & Matthew McGranaghan & Jura Liaukonyte & Kenneth C. Wilbur, 2023. "Price promotions, beneficiary framing, and mental accounting," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 147-181, June.
    4. Mengze Shi, 2013. "A theoretical analysis of endogenous and exogenous switching costs," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 205-230, June.
    5. Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Sigué, Simon-Pierre, 2015. "Trade deals and/or on-package coupons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 541-554.
    6. Khouja, Moutaz, 2006. "A joint optimal pricing, rebate value, and lot sizing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 706-723, October.
    7. Barat, Somjit & Amos, Clinton & Paswan, Audhesh & Holmes, Gary, 2013. "An exploratory investigation into how socioeconomic attributes influence coupons redeeming intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 240-247.
    8. Kaltcheva, Velitchka D. & Winsor, Robert D. & Patino, Anthony & Shapiro, Stewart, 2013. "Impact of promotions on shopper price comparisons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 809-815.
    9. Su, Meng & Zheng, Xiaona & Sun, Luping, 2014. "Coupon Trading and its Impacts on Consumer Purchase and Firm Profits," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 40-61.
    10. Kevin Chung, 2020. "Incorporating a “Better” Behavioral Bias for Both Consumers and Firms in Rebate Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(4), pages 1627-1646, April.
    11. Nies, Salome & Natter, Martin, 2010. "Are private label users attractive targets for retailer coupons?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 281-291.
    12. Z. John Zhang & Aradhna Krishna & Sanjay K. Dhar, 2000. "The Optimal Choice of Promotional Vehicles: Front-Loaded or Rear-Loaded Incentives?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 348-362, March.
    13. Khouja, Moutaz & Pan, Jingming & Ratchford, Brian T. & Zhou, Jing, 2011. "Analysis of free gift card program effectiveness," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 444-461.
    14. Aradhna Krishna & Z. John Zhang, 1999. "Short- or Long-Duration Coupons: The Effect of the Expiration Date on the Profitability of Coupon Promotions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1041-1056, August.
    15. Yuefeng Li & Jingming Pan & Jing Zhou, 2022. "Optimal pricing with free gift cards in a two-product supply chain," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 125-155, March.
    16. Sanjay K. Dhar & Jagmohan S. Raju, 1998. "The Effects of Cross-Ruff Coupons on Sales and Profits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1501-1516, November.
    17. Qiang Lu & Sridhar Moorthy, 2007. "Coupons Versus Rebates," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 67-82, 01-02.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:15:y:1996:i:2:p:192-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.