IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i3p1548-1564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A General Branch-and-Cut Framework for Rotating Workforce Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Tristan Becker

    (Chair of Operations Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen D-52072, Germany)

  • Maximilian Schiffer

    (TUM School of Management & Munich Data Science Institute, Technical University of Munich, Munich D-80333, Germany)

  • Grit Walther

    (Chair of Operations Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen D-52072, Germany)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a general algorithmic framework for rotating workforce scheduling. We develop a graph representation that allows to model a schedule as a Eulerian cycle of stints, which we then use to derive a problem formulation that is compact toward the number of employees. We develop a general branch-and-cut framework that solves rotating workforce scheduling in its basic variant, as well as several additional problem variants that are relevant in practice. These variants comprise, among others, objectives for the maximization of free weekends and the minimization of employees. Our computational studies show that the developed framework constitutes a new state of the art for rotating workforce scheduling. For the first time, we solve all 6,000 instances of the status quo benchmark for rotating workforce scheduling to optimality with an average computational time of 0.07 seconds and a maximum computational time of 2.53 seconds. These results reduce average computational times by more than 99% compared with existing methods. Our algorithmic framework shows consistent computational performance, which is robust across all studied problem variants. Summary of Contribution: This paper proposes a novel exact algorithmic framework for the well-known rotating workforce scheduling problem (RWSP). Although the RWSP has been extensively studied in different problem variants and for different exact and heuristic solution approaches, the presented algorithmic framework constitutes a new state-of-the-art for the RWSP that solves all known benchmark sets to optimality and improves on the current state-of-the-art by orders of magnitude with respect to computational times, especially for large-scale instances. The paper is both of methodological value for researchers and of high interest for practitioners. For researchers, the presented framework is amenable for various problem variants and provides a common ground for further studies and research. For practitioners and software developers, low computational times of a few seconds allows the framework to be to embedded into personnel scheduling software.

Suggested Citation

  • Tristan Becker & Maximilian Schiffer & Grit Walther, 2022. "A General Branch-and-Cut Framework for Rotating Workforce Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1548-1564, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:1548-1564
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2021.1149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1149
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John J. Bartholdi & James B. Orlin & H. Donald Ratliff, 1980. "Cyclic Scheduling via Integer Programs with Circular Ones," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 1074-1085, October.
    2. B Maenhout & M Vanhoucke, 2009. "The impact of incorporating nurse-specific characteristics in a cyclical scheduling approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1683-1698, December.
    3. A.T. Ernst & H. Jiang & M. Krishnamoorthy & B. Owens & D. Sier, 2004. "An Annotated Bibliography of Personnel Scheduling and Rostering," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 21-144, March.
    4. Natashia Boland & Mike Hewitt & Luke Marshall & Martin Savelsbergh, 2017. "The Continuous-Time Service Network Design Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1303-1321, October.
    5. M.A. Boschetti & A. Mingozzi & S. Ricciardelli, 2004. "An Exact Algorithm for the Simplified Multiple Depot Crew Scheduling Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 177-201, March.
    6. Tristan Becker, 2020. "A decomposition heuristic for rotational workforce scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 539-554, October.
    7. G Laporte & G Pesant, 2004. "A general multi-shift scheduling system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(11), pages 1208-1217, November.
    8. ManMohan Sodhi & Stephen Norris, 2004. "A Flexible, Fast, and Optimal Modeling Approach Applied to Crew Rostering at London Underground," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 259-281, March.
    9. Millar, Harvey H. & Kiragu, Mona, 1998. "Cyclic and non-cyclic scheduling of 12 h shift nurses by network programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 582-592, February.
    10. Andersen, Anders Reenberg & Nielsen, Bo Friis & Reinhardt, Line Blander & Stidsen, Thomas Riis, 2019. "Staff optimization for time-dependent acute patient flow," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 94-105.
    11. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    12. Tristan Becker & Pia Mareike Steenweg & Brigitte Werners, 2019. "Cyclic shift scheduling with on-call duties for emergency medical services," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 676-690, December.
    13. Rudy Hung, 1994. "Multiple-Shift Workforce Scheduling Under the 3--4 Workweek with Different Weekday and Weekend Labor Requirements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 280-284, February.
    14. Hadi W. Purnomo & Jonathan F. Bard, 2007. "Cyclic preference scheduling for nurses using branch and price," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 200-220, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolbeck, Lena Antonia, 2019. "Fairness aspects in personnel scheduling," Discussion Papers 2019/16, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    2. Tristan Becker, 2020. "A decomposition heuristic for rotational workforce scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 539-554, October.
    3. Safae Er-Rbib & Guy Desaulniers & Issmail Elhallaoui & Patrick Munroe, 2021. "Preference-based and cyclic bus driver rostering problem with fixed days off," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 251-286, June.
    4. Sophie Veldhoven & Gerhard Post & Egbert Veen & Tim Curtois, 2016. "An assessment of a days off decomposition approach to personnel shift scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(1), pages 207-223, April.
    5. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Roberta Rossi, 2022. "The emergency department physician rostering problem: obtaining equitable solutions via network optimization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 916-959, December.
    6. Yann Ferrand & Michael Magazine & Uday S. Rao & Todd F. Glass, 2011. "Building Cyclic Schedules for Emergency Department Physicians," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 521-533, December.
    7. Sanja Petrovic, 2019. "“You have to get wet to learn how to swim” applied to bridging the gap between research into personnel scheduling and its implementation in practice," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(1), pages 161-179, April.
    8. Heil, Julia & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2020. "Railway crew scheduling: Models, methods and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 405-425.
    9. E K Burke & T Curtois & L F van Draat & J-K van Ommeren & G Post, 2011. "Progress control in iterated local search for nurse rostering," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(2), pages 360-367, February.
    10. Lin, Shih-Wei & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2014. "Minimizing shifts for personnel task scheduling problems: A three-phase algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 323-334.
    11. Jaime Miranda & Pablo A. Rey & Antoine Sauré & Richard Weber, 2018. "Metro Uses a Simulation-Optimization Approach to Improve Fare-Collection Shift Scheduling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 529-542, November.
    12. Wu, Zhiying & Xu, Guoning & Chen, Qingxin & Mao, Ning, 2023. "Two stochastic optimization methods for shift design with uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    13. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    14. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    15. Arpan Rijal & Marco Bijvank & Asvin Goel & René de Koster, 2021. "Workforce Scheduling with Order-Picking Assignments in Distribution Facilities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 725-746, May.
    16. Borgonjon, Tessa & Maenhout, Broos, 2022. "An exact approach for the personnel task rescheduling problem with task retiming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 465-484.
    17. Young-Chae Hong & Amy Cohn & Stephen Gorga & Edmond O’Brien & William Pozehl & Jennifer Zank, 2019. "Using Optimization Techniques and Multidisciplinary Collaboration to Solve a Challenging Real-World Residency Scheduling Problem," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 201-212, May.
    18. Lotfi Hidri & Achraf Gazdar & Mohammed M. Mabkhot, 2020. "Optimized Procedure to Schedule Physicians in an Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    19. Damcı-Kurt, Pelin & Zhang, Minjiao & Marentay, Brian & Govind, Nirmal, 2019. "Improving physician schedules by leveraging equalization: Cases from hospitals in U.S," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 182-193.
    20. Rajeswari Muniyan & Rajakumar Ramalingam & Sultan S. Alshamrani & Durgaprasad Gangodkar & Ankur Dumka & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Mamoon Rashid, 2022. "Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm with Nelder–Mead Method to Solve Nurse Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:1548-1564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.