IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijatma/v4y2004i2-3p240-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modularisation in the auto industry: can manufacturer's architectural strategies meet supplier's sustainable profit trajectories?

Author

Listed:
  • Francois Fourcade
  • Christophe Midler

Abstract

After a promising initial development in the 1990s, modularity in the auto industry is still in the testing phase. The goal of this paper is to understand this ambiguous situation. Our main argument will be that the modularity issue is most of the time addressed from the OEM point of view, as a key "descending" architectural decision. We will demonstrate that a consistent and sustainable trend to product modularisation has also to be analysed from the suppliers' "ascending" strategies point of view. Section 1 is devoted to definitions of module notion and its expected benefits and pitfalls as analysed in the literature. In Section 2 we focus on the case of Front End Modules, by a longitudinal analysis on the experience of a leader supplier in the domain. The empirical results show that the first modularisation moves reveal a large range of situations, depending on perimeter and responsibility delegation. The result in terms of profitability for the supplier varies and is often not sufficient to sustain offensive development in the future. In Section 3, we propose a typology that illustrates consistent module strategies for suppliers, strategies which are characterised by their value target, the resources and the implementing conditions they require. The paper is based on an interactive research with a first-tier supplier.

Suggested Citation

  • Francois Fourcade & Christophe Midler, 2004. "Modularisation in the auto industry: can manufacturer's architectural strategies meet supplier's sustainable profit trajectories?," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2/3), pages 240-260.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijatma:v:4:y:2004:i:2/3:p:240-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=5328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincent FRIGANT (GREThA-GRES), 2009. "Is the automotive supply chain compatible with Corporate Social Responsible practices? (In French)," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2009-04, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    2. Seyoum, Belay & Lian, Yunshan, 2018. "Market performance implications of modularization: Evidence from global auto firms operating in China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 852-866.
    3. Vincent FRIGANT, 2007. "Ten years of modularity: empirical evidences on the restructuring of the auto part industry (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2007-15, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    4. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Chi-Hyon Lee & Manuela N. Hoehn-Weiss & Samina Karim, 2016. "Grouping interdependent tasks: Using spectral graph partitioning to study complex systems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 177-191, January.
    5. Vincent Frigant & Damien Talbot, 2005. "Technological Determinism and Modularity: Lessons from a Comparison between Aircraft and Auto Industries in Europe," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 337-355.
    6. Mathieu Bécue & Jean Belin & Damien Talbot, 2014. "Relational rent and underperformance of hub firms in the aeronautics value chain," Post-Print halshs-02337588, HAL.
    7. Cabigiosu, Anna & Zirpoli, Francesco & Camuffo, Arnaldo, 2013. "Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 662-675.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijatma:v:4:y:2004:i:2/3:p:240-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=2 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.