This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

A Test Of The Strategic Effect Of Basel Ii Operational Risk Requirements On Banks

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Carolyn Currie

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The most problematic of the Basel II capital adequacy requirements is the subset of Pillar I, requiring provision for Operational Risk (OR) as distinct from credit and market risk. Previous tests of the strategic effect of this new regulation from three prior Quality Impact Studies (QIS), conducted in G10 countries under the guidance of the Bank for International Settlements, have concluded that OR requirements pose difficulties of definition, implementation and strategic planning. Anticipated strategic effects include dramatic changes to product development, investment and asset mix, as well as the necessity to rapidly develop new risk rating models and techniques, together with vastly expanded internal and external audit compliance routines. Unlike QIS 1, 2 and 3, QIS 4 focuses on operational risk. This paper discusses its approach, in view of the ongoing difficulties that bank experience with operational risk, particularly in the construction of a database. It concludes by listing the unanswered questions that have not even been addressed in four studies of the strategic impact of Basel II’s OR requirements. It also suggests that many smaller banks and emerging nations may not be able to use the sophisticated approaches and hence, will suffer a competitive disadvantage. In view of the drawbacks in the simpler approaches, such as lack of correlation of operational risk and revenue, other indicators such as the standard deviation of efficiency measures are suggested.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Icfai Press in its journal The Icfai University Journal of Monetary Economics.

Volume (Year): IV (2006)
Issue (Month): 4 (November)
Pages: 6-28
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjmo:v:04:y:2006:i:4:p:6-28

Contact details of provider:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Y G Sivaram).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Alina Mihaela Dima, 2009. "Operational Risk Assesement Tools for Quality Management in Banking Services," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(26), pages 364-372, June. [Downloadable!]
  2. George Benston, 2007. "Basel II and Bankers’ Propensity to Take or Avoid Excessive Risk," Atlantic Economic Journal, International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 35(4), pages 373-382, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Zhuang Cai & Peter Wheale, 2009. "Managing Efficient Capital Allocation with Emphasis on the Chinese Experience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 111-135, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over 80% of the top 1000 economists are registered on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.