IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmsjnl/v10y2020i1p152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Synergy of Tradition and Innovation Leading to Sustainable Geographical Indication Products: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Gocci
  • Christoph Luetge

Abstract

The traditional production of geographical indications (GIs) are struggling to react to external influences such as climate change, changing market conditions. There is a call for innovation within GI products without compromising traditional practices. In GI research, tradition and innovation are often debated because it is apparent that they exclude each other. However, there are findings that a combination of these two elements can have effects on sustainability. Through acknowledging the synergy, diversification strategies are commonly used; those have a remarkable effect on all dimensions of sustainability (social, economic, environmental). The aim of this paper is to show evidence from literature stating that the incorporated tradition of GI products can exist in synergy with innovation. The TISyn (tradition-innovation synergy) model is presented as starting point for future research on this matter. We conclude that focusing on innovation within the GI scheme is required for a changing focus on sustainable productions. However, examples show that without taking tradition into account, GI stakeholders obtain negative outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Gocci & Christoph Luetge, 2020. "The Synergy of Tradition and Innovation Leading to Sustainable Geographical Indication Products: A Literature Review," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 152-152, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/download/0/0/42704/44615
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/0/42704
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    3. Giacomini, Corrado & Arfini, Filippo & de Roest, Kees, 2010. "Interprofession and typical products: the case of Parmigiano Reggiano cheese," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95026, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Cozzi, Elena & Arfini, Filippo & Donati, Michele & Guareschi, Marianna & Mancini, Maria Cecilia & Menozzi, Davide & Veneziani, Mario, 2018. "The socio economic sustainability of food quality schemes (FQSs): the case of Parmigiano Reggiano PDO," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276189, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Kuhne, Bianka & Gellynck, Xavier, 2009. "Food Chain Networks as a Leverage for Innovation Capacity," 2009 International European Forum, February 15-20, 2009, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 59200, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    6. Angelo Riviezzo & Antonella Garofano & Julien Granata & Samaneh Kakavand, 2017. "Using terroir to exploit local identity and cultural heritage in marketing strategies: An exploratory study among Italian and French wine producers," Post-Print hal-02017371, HAL.
    7. Cozzi, Elena & Arfini, Filippo & Donati, Michele & Guareschi, Marianna & Mancini, Maria Cecilia & Menozzi, Davide & Veneziani, Mario, 2018. "The socio economic sustainability of food quality scheme Parmigiano Reggiano Case Study," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276211, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Angelo Riviezzo & Antonella Garofano & Julien Granata & Samaneh Kakavand, 2017. "Using terroir to exploit local identity and cultural heritage in marketing strategies: An exploratory study among Italian and French wine producers," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(2), pages 136-149, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Gocci & Christoph Luetge & Hristos Vakoufaris, 2020. "Between Tradition and Sustainable Innovation: Empirical Evidence for the Role of Geographical Indications," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(9), pages 101-101, September.
    2. Sara Cavagnero & Simona Giordano, 2022. "Sui Generis Geographical Indications Fostering Localized Sustainable Fashion: A Cross-Industry Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Bixian Lou & Xiaopeng Fu & Boyi Xue, 2023. "Effectiveness, Problems, and Transformation of Geographical Indications in the Context of Rural Revitalization: Evidence from Pengshui in Chongqing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Guilherme Silva Fracarolli, 2021. "Mapping Online Geographical Indication: Agrifood Products on E-Commerce Shelves of Mercosur and the European Union," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mara Cerquetti & Concetta Ferrara & Annamaria Romagnoli & Gianluca Vagnarelli, 2022. "Enhancing Intangible Cultural Heritage for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas: The Case of the “Marche Food and Wine Memories” Project (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Ingrid Boas & Frank Biermann & Norichika Kanie, 2016. "Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 449-464, June.
    4. Wilson, Christopher & van der Velden, Maja, 2022. "Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Anne P. M. Velenturf & Phil Purnell, 2017. "Resource Recovery from Waste: Restoring the Balance between Resource Scarcity and Waste Overload," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Phoebe Koundouri, 2020. "The Economics of Sustainable Development," DEOS Working Papers 2005, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    7. OGREAN Claudia, 2015. "Corporate Initiatives And Strategies To Meet The Environmental Challenges – Contributions Towards A Green Economic Development," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 10(3), pages 62-70, December.
    8. Wiśniewska Anna Maria, 2021. "Sustainable development and management of medical tourism companies in Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 57(2), pages 151-160, June.
    9. Simon Ling & Adam Landon & Michael Tarrant & Donald Rubin, 2021. "The Influence of Instructional Delivery Modality on Sustainability Literacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Esther Prieto-Jiménez & Luis López-Catalán & Blanca López-Catalán & Guillermo Domínguez-Fernández, 2021. "Sustainable Development Goals and Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Juliana Segura-Salazar & Luís Marcelo Tavares, 2018. "Sustainability in the Minerals Industry: Seeking a Consensus on Its Meaning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-38, May.
    12. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Michaela Maurer & Franz Xaver Bogner, 2020. "First steps towards sustainability? University freshmen perceptions on nature versus environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Slavica Stamatovic Vuckovic & Kosara Kujundzic, 2023. "Strategies for Realization of Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-31, April.
    15. Else Ragni Yttredal & Nathalie Homlong, 2020. "Perception of Sustainable Development in a Local World Heritage Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    16. López-González, A. & Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L., 2018. "Sustainability and design assessment of rural hybrid microgrids in Venezuela," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 229-242.
    17. Mariusz Izdebski & Marianna Jacyna, 2021. "An Efficient Hybrid Algorithm for Energy Expenditure Estimation for Electric Vehicles in Urban Service Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    18. Karen Holm Olsen & Fatemeh Bakhtiari & Virender Kumar Duggal & Jørge Villy Fenhann, 2019. "Sustainability labelling as a tool for reporting the sustainable development impacts of climate actions relevant to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 225-251, April.
    19. Cecilia Smaniotto & Anna Saramin & Laura Brunelli & Maria Parpinel, 2022. "Insights and Next Challenges for the Italian Educational System to Teach Sustainability in a Global Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.